Reading the sagas and I am struck by how absolutely homophobic the norsemen were. They had literal laws against insinuating that another man was homosexual and if someone did so to you even in jest, you were legally allowed and expected to kill him in order to defend your honor. Whereas the greeks permitted it when you were the top, tge norse saw it as an abomination, a work of nithing, because you were effectively destroying another person's dignity.I think that today we still instinctively believe that homosexuals, especially bottoms, are pathetic creatures and that the act of sodomy damages a person's dignity deeply, hence we often see it as an insult in war and politics even by people who pretend to think there is nothing wrong with it.
Vikangz were grug tier retards. White nationalists worship them because they all have retard level iq.
The homosex is unironically really bad and that's why rising societies hate it and declining societies embrace it
>>25027845they btfo french in england with just enough iq to sail through the sea though, iq is overrated, the last resort of physically weak nerds >but muh iq is bigger kek
>>25027845I disagree. They were absolute beasts with a rich tradition of poetry and myth, not too unlike the ancient greeks. Also, "viking" was an occupation, not an ethnicity. Many sagas feature norse heroes besting viking pirates to prove themselves. A particular trope one can see is the hero being confronted by a berserker who has typically been promised some young and fair woman as a wife. Sometimes it is a strapping lad who bests him and marries the woman instead, but then you also have the ugly anti-hero Egill Skallagrímsson who, for some inexplicable reason, is moved by a young girl's tears and decides to free her from a berserker's clutches.
>>25027845your skin looks like dog poop
>>25027863My favorite berserker scene is when one of them starts pumping himself up and biting his shield in front of Gunnar Hamundarsson, who promptly kicks tge bottom of his shield so that his teath fly out.
Wasnt the problem that young warriors would go around calling older and weaker men faggots and then taking their stuff because they couldnt properly defend themselves?
>>25027845Fpbp>>25027883You mean chocolate? You're going extinct btw.
>>25027838The reason is not because of dick in ass, though. Being called homosexual implies you are less than man. It's the equivalent of being called a woman.That's why it's a powerful insult in war, politics, and Russia.As for ass sex, you'd be surprised how many manly men, especially in Russia, engage in it and find no problem in it as long as they remain muzhiks, that is, go to gym, drink vodka, work in construction, and occasionally fuck and beat a woman. And these men will call engineers or IT developers with a wife and family pidors because they don't go to gym, drink vodka, do crimes, beat up women. Being gay means being a sissy means being weak.I have a suspicion that a similar dynamic was present in the Norse society because they were just as a retarded brutish scum as contemporary Russians. Only the Celtic stock improved their gopnik pitbull nigger genetics.
>>25027883I'm white thobeit
>>25027845Muhfuggin vikangz wrote they MF names on the muhfuggin hagia sofia YA HEARD ME. AYO we'd BEEN have that shit back if da mean old jewish massa aint keep us down DAS RITE.
>>25027838That’s because their entire worldview and culture stood in opposition to submission. They were extremely freedom loving. They were possibly most masculine culture in history. It was all about honor and respect and greatness. Getting fucked by another man would have been seen as extremely dishonorable. Same with fucking a man since that is dishonoring him and yourself.
>>25027838Seems pretty similar across Greeks, Romans and Norse. You're supposedly not a fag if you fuck another man, you're just jerking off with his asshole. The difference is in small societies where each man has to be independent your cumslut has more reasons to rebel and demand to be treated as a man instead of accepting his position like in Greek complex cities.
>>25027980The popularity of homo buttsex in history is massively overblown by popculture and anachronistic modern homosexuality. Most homosexual acts of history were frotting and thigh fucking. Anal sex was really too dirty to partake in that muc before the modern era. That’s why the most zesty passages of antiquity always talk about a boy’s thighs not his ass.
>>25027838>I think that today we still instinctively believe that homosexuals, especially bottoms, are pathetic creatures and that the act of sodomy damages a person's dignity deeplyYou’re right, and bigotry against bottoms is common even among gay men. Nobody can ever come up with an explanation for why it’s so bad of course. Just “ew it’s icky”
>>25028039It’s unsanitary. There’s a reason HIV is so much more likely to spread from gay anal sex than vaginal sex.
>>25028039your asshole works like a fucking valve, it's just not developed for two sided movements, i'm guessing old faggots have to wear dipers not to shit themselves compulsively
>>25028039Because you're a useless hole with no backbone or self-respect.
>>25028056>>25028061Nobody has this same revulsion against women who do anal. I’m sure you’ll reply and say you do but we know that isn’t true in all likelihood. It’s the act +the gender that makes it gross for people. Not the act.
>>25028086Anal sex is disgusting in general.
>>25028086Barren whores get similar levels of respect. They're pointless creatures completely dependent on men while offering nothing but their holes.
>>25027838>I think that todayI think today our definitions of homosexuality are divergent from the norse
>>25028113Their definitions were pretty straightforward. A man who has intercourse with men. They probably didn't believe in some homosexual "identity" or that people are born that way, though.
>>25028086i would never put my dick into a shitting hole
>>25027919It was also more than that because it bereft a man of dignity. The nors3men were not people who said "it's fine when you are doing the fucking."They had clear laws against it and it was required that a man kill the perpetrator, even if it was just an insult, to defend his honor. It was considered an evil deed all around.
>>25027911No. The problem had more to do with the concept of honor, which is largely alien yet still somewhat present in our societies.
>>25028128Precisely, I'm uncertain that definition even holds across contemporary institutions like the military let alone 800 years ago
>>25028091>>2502812999.5% one of you have consumed anal porn in the last 6 months, if not sooner. Even if you aren’t bullshitting, it doesn’t change the fact that most men are not revulsed by the act. Half of sexually active men have done it, a third of sexual active women. It’s exceedingly common, and there is no social cost associated with the act when it’s participants are heterosexual. >>25028095Weird fetish posting. I don’t have a degradation fetish so you can stop
>>25028173i fucked your mom in the anus, now stop measuring everybody accordingly to your shitty anal fetish you weirdo
>>25028173You have woke gay brainworms. Replace all references to anal sex with masturbating using someone's thighs. Nothing changes about how worthless as men the bottoms are.
>>25028173I’ve been disgusted by anal ever since I first started watching porn. If most straight people today like anal it only shows how gay and homophilic straight sex has become in our modern society (same reason shit like BDSM and hooking up has become more popular)Even oral sex is kinda disgusting but I will give it a pass since it’s significantly less degenerate than the other things and spreads less disease.
>>25027916NTA but I'm gonna rape you
>>25028557>oral sex is kinda disgustingYou lost me.
>>25028557all sex is disgusting thats why the disgust part of your brain literally shuts down when you are horny consider how vile french kissing is in any other context, and thats just kissing.
>>25027850This. Faggotry is objectively perverted and wrong, and I refuse to pretend otherwise.
>>25028173>99.5% one of you have consumed anal porn in the last 6 monthsThis is some next-level projection.>most men are not revulsed by the actGuess again. Women are repelled by it too.
Vikings are so cool dude
>>25027838quote section or die>inb4 i made it up but its true
At least those barbarians were baseder in something than the glorious civilized people of Rome and Greece
>>25028656Why?
>>25028817The sex drive is the natural motivation to reproduce. Homosexuality can never result in reproduction. It's an evolutionary dead end. A homosexual's genes are marked for extinction.
>>25028859Is being naturally sterile objectively wrong?How would you feel about two people with known genetic disorders passing on their genes? They are fulfilling the natural motivation to reproduce.
>>25028859Not everyone needs to reproduce. Honestly most people shouldn't
the fact that assfucking has persisted despite severe persecution over thousands of years across the world is telling
>>25028903>>25028896the point is that homosexuality is irrational and disordered and everyone becomes a little gay and immoral and insane when we celebrate it
>>25028914It's just as insane to try to brush everything gay under the rug and pretend gay shit doesn't exist. The very fact that homos exist in every human society and in non humans proves to me that it's an urge no less natural than heterosexuality.
Most of the time homosexual is just used as an insult to men seen as cowardly and dishonorable. I can't think of any example where it's intended to be a truthful statement.People more commonly insult men by saying that they would be better off as women or that they're women
>>25027919That's a lot of cope
>>25028039You're literally doing the woman's roleMost of 'being a man' is about not being a woman
>>25028948They don't. There are primitive societies that have no word for it and don't understand it when explained.
>>25028995You talking about the sagas or modern times? Because in the sagas, those things are closely related phenomenons. A coward is womanly. A man who is fucked is womanly and bereft of dignity, hence it is an insult.
and what's the problem here exactly?
>>25028039>Nobody can ever come up with an explanation for why it’s so bad of course. Just “ew it’s icky”If you weren't an effeminate faggot you wouldn't have to ask this question.
>nooooo why weren't white men pro-pedophilic assrape like my based meds
>>25027919>I have a suspicion that a similar dynamic was present in the Norse society because they were just as a retarded brutish scum as contemporary Russians. Only the Celtic stock improved their gopnik pitbull nigger genetics.Rent fucking free KEK
>>25027838What is even going on in that painting? Is he skating?
>>25027838>Whereas the greeks permitted it when you were the top, tge norse saw it as an abomination, a work of nithing, because you were effectively destroying another person's dignity.Nords have higher emotional intelligence than Greeks to realize that the top-bottom dynamic is wrong and leads to severe mental illness in the case of the bottom.
>>25027980No, you're just overapplying Greco-Roman attitudes here. The pagan Norse were harsher about faggotry, both ends, than the Judeo-Christian tradition.
>>25028656>>25028859>>25028914>>25029824>>25029853Homosexuality is traditional and right-wing.
>>25029926The norse were pretty traditional and clearly extremely homophobic. I'm not saying they were right, but homosexuals today tend to be left wing, even though leftist probably do not actually see homosexuals and bottoms especially as being dignified.
>Compared with heterosexual men, gay and bisexual men have a lower body mass index and decreased odds of being overweight or obese.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3910028/>The data indicate that a much higher percentage of gay males are in the normal weight category compared to straight males; 41.9% versus 27.0%https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-10936-2_16>Intelligent individuals are more likely to identify themselves as homosexual and engage in homosexual behaviour.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22293319/>Men in same-sex marriages have higher levels of education and higher annual incomes than men who are married to opposite-sex partners. Half of men in same-sex marriages have at least a bachelor’s degree, compared with 38% of men in opposite-sex marriages.https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/07/07/on-some-demographic-measures-people-in-same-sex-marriages-differ-from-those-in-opposite-sex-marriages/>Men in same-sex marriages also have higher incomes, overall, than their counterparts in opposite-sex marriages. The median adjusted annual household income for men in same-sex marriages was roughly $132,300 in 2019, significantly higher than the median income for men in opposite-sex marriages ($90,700).https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/07/07/on-some-demographic-measures-people-in-same-sex-marriages-differ-from-those-in-opposite-sex-marriages/>Individuals with low cognitive ability are less likely to support equal rights for same-sex couples.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289617303628 >'Very bright' individuals (with IQ>125) have had eight times as many homosexual partners as 'very dull' individuals (with IQ<75) (2.42 vs. 0.31). In sharp contrast, 'very bright' individuals have had less than 40% more heterosexual partners than 'very dull' individuals (9.79 vs. 7.10).https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science/article/abs/intelligence-and-homosexuality/E07585DD50D9924C677EFC7B6060AB0A
>>25028086>woman doing women stuff is not considered revolting>but man doing women stuff is revolting!!!>HOW CAN THIS BEGood argument, archgenius.
>>25027980No. Again, the norse had clear laws against this because they thought that the act basiclaly bereft a man of any and all dignity. You seem to basically share this sentiment, but you pull the "therefore it's ok when you are destroying another man's worth, but the norse were more principled about this and believed that it was a very villainous deed worse than simply killing a man.
>I should like to know why nearly every man that approaches greatness tends to homosexuality.D.H. Lawrence>The gays, good heavens. A full 35 or 40 percent of major Western authors from the beginning to the present day might have been gay. Would be very safe to assume.Harold Bloom>Those inspired by this kind of love turn to the male, with an affection for that which is naturally more vigorous and has more sense.Pausanias (Symposium 181c)>In youth and young manhood this sort of male is the best because he is by nature the most manly. Some people say such males are without shame, but that is not true. They do what they do not out of shamelessness but out of confidence, courage and manliness, and they embrace that which is like themselves. And there is good evidence for this in the fact that only males of this type, when they are grown up, prove to be the real men in politics.Aristophanes (Symposium 191e-192c)
>>25027916You've taken shits and thought to yourself how well it matches your skin tone. All browns have.
>>25029930women also have mouths. does that mean blowjobs are gay?
>>25029937kill yourself, faggot.
Heterosexual weaklings. The trash of history... No straight man ever contributed anything important to Western culture. Heterosexuality is a form of leftist degeneracy.
>>25029942>blocks your path
>>25029945I'll make an exception for him...
>>25029946kill yourself.
>>25029949Straight "men" aren't allowed to speak to gay BVLLS. Straight "men" circumcise their progeny and pay alimony
>>25029952 kill yourself.
I love these thinly provocative threads. They bring out only the most schizophrenic posters here.
>>25029926More evidence that fascists and nazis aren't real rightists
>>25029929Now remove blacks and try it again>>25029937This is all completely stupid but>>In youth and young manhood this sort of male is the best because he is by nature the most manly. Some people say such males are without shame, but that is not true. They do what they do not out of shamelessness but out of confidence, courage and manliness, and they embrace that which is like themselves. And there is good evidence for this in the fact that only males of this type, when they are grown up, prove to be the real men in politics.Are you saying modern homos are the most manly? They're just such giga males they end up like this somehow? Does that remotely track with reality?
>>25027980>You're supposedly not a fag if you fuck another man, you're just jerking off with his asshole
>>25029926Go ahead and tell the danesmen, plus all the other germanic tribes that enforced monogamic couplings they were jewish then, medsissy.
>>25029942Homosexuality is a sign of narcissism and butt worms.
>>25028129>>25028091based. I hate that I watched so much porn as a virgin and thought it was normal
Heterosexual "men" really spend their whole lives debasing themselves for pussy. From his earliest adolescence the first thing a boy learns is to suppress his true feelings in order to please woman. "Happy wife, happy life" etc. This is mental circumcision.
>>25027838>They had literal laws against insinuating that another man was homosexual and if someone did so to you even in jest, you were legally allowed and expected to kill him in order to defend your honor.it's only in our retarded liberal era that you can't kill someone for insulting you
Why were the Gayreeks like this?
>>25027845Yed and? Being low IQ and violent is based. That's why i respect Blacks in America for having an actual warrior spirit
>>25030398One might reasonably argue that this is beside the point but the fact remains that Aristophanes is taking the piss through a large part of his section in Symposium: which you would have at least factored to dismiss if you had read it instead of getting your information from memes.
>>25030589Yeah like the other 99,000 references to assfucking in his work and Plato and Xenophon
>>25030337worms
>>25030613Fixated?
>>25029932>it was a very villainous deed worse than simply killing a manBut not equivalent to being the bottom. Like I said in the post the difference is men didn't accept their position as bottoms so forcing it becomes an issue for the society. In small communities even the difference between a slave and a king becomes less and less clear over time. These are roles that work in complex cities not for 50 people trying to survive the winter in a shared house.
>reading Norse myth>woman tricks a wolf by covering her brother in honey and putting honey in his mouth so when the wolf come to eat him, the wolf will lick the honey out of the guy mouth and he can bite the wolfs tongue off>then they have blood related bro X sis sex
>>25030594There are a handful of references to practices now historically understood to have been non-penetrative, as I disclaimed in my first clause. The bigger issue which you continue to dodge is that you haven‘t actually read any of them.
>>25030711Aristophanes talks explicitly about anal sex repeatedly and jokes about how there are no men in Athens who don't have wide asses. Intercrural sex was the idealised polite form for art and philosophical discussion, but anal sex is referenced regularly in bawdy poetry, comedy and graffiti. I don't even like anal sex, I'd prefer this not to be the case. But it's just true.
>>25030627>But not equivalent to being the bottom.you're an intellectually dishonest prick.
>>25030627Non-equivalence does not mean it was permitted or "more permissable". It doesn't really have anything to do with whatever structural feature tickles your fancy
>>25030788>>25030795Going to cry?
>>25030795it's funny that anon's argument is basically that its preferable to do the raping or stabbing instead of being the one raped or stabbed. like no shit.
Imagine a world without women or straight "men"...
>>25027838>homophobicCan you read anything without a political or liberal bias, just enjoy it for what it is?The world was very different back then, you know?
>>25030822I'm not OP but being homophobic is a liberal modernist degeneracy. Being gay is Far Right.
>>25030795What the fuck are you even talking about retard? Why are you attributing these random statements I never even implied to me? Are you completely mindless and illiterate?>>25030800Is that my "argument" retard?
>>25027838Homophobia is brown coded and abrahmic coded
>>25030800Plato would disagree
>>25029940What are you rambling about? Sucking dick is a woman thing just like taking it in any other hole. For a man to do womanish acts is gay, yes.
>>25030398It was a practice confined to the Athenian upper class and certain other highly specific classes (e.g. the Theban homobrigade), that's the main thing to remember. The idea that this was a general practice is based entirely on the fact that the class where faggotry was accepted was also the class with a monopoly on literature; saying that "the Greeks were fine with it" is like a person from the future determining what modern US people's beliefs were by watching only recordings of CNN anchors.
>>25030962>practice confined to the Athenian upper classNo primary source evidence for this. There doesn't seem to be any evidence of lower class distaste for the practice - lower class men constituted the majority of jurors in the law courts (on account of the financial incentive for attending) and from the preserved speeches we have of Aeschines and Demosthenes there doesn't seem to have been any disadvantage to parading one's homosexual affairs in court.
>>25030739>anal sex is referenced regularly in bawdy poetry, comedy and graffitiWhile that does invite the application of it as a sort of humorous excess in inverse, I don‘t know that such is a more accurate bellwether on reality.
>>25030968Who was paying them to attend? The upper classes, perhaps?
>>25030979Are you retarded
>>25027838faggotry is disgusting and should not be allowed, everyone everywhere throughout history knew this prior to five minutes ago
>>25030988Incorrect.
>>25030834>Is that my "argument" retard?your argument is a non-sequitur. how does one generally preferring to be a top over a bottom somehow carry the connotations that nordics considered gay sex to be okay?
>>25030992Asians are a bunch of androgynous, effeminate faggots.
>>25030739Yeah, this is undeniable on the other hand. It's the same for Rome, just look at Catullus 16, the one that made translators conventionally not give his poems incipit titles. Or that graffito from Pompeii written by a woman which is signed "Septumius the Assfucker".
>>25030968>No primary source evidence for this>The idea that this was a general practice is based entirely on the fact that the class where faggotry was accepted was also the class with a monopoly on literatureLMAO, but actually there's plenty of evidence that it was at minimum ridiculed by the masses: just think of the gag in Thesmophoriazusai where Euripides goes to Agathon's house to ask him to disguise himself as a woman and infiltate the women's assembly, and Agathon is already dressed in drag. The joke is literally that this guy, a real guy who would have been in the audience, is a flaming faggot.
>>25031035You're mixing up effeminacy and homosexuality. Agathon was an adult passive. Pederasts are never mocked in the plays.
>>25031039>You're mixing up effeminacy and homosexuality.same thing.
>>25031043Be precise
>>25031039>nuh-uh, your single example only condemns half of all male homosexuals! It doesn't count!Yes, this seems like a good-faith conversation worth spending my time on.
>>25027838This idea that Nords have been warlike is cope, even back than Nordica were very progressive and egalitarian with women and other groups. The Nords have always been a peaceful people that have been ahead with progress
>>25031096You just don’t understand the society we’re talking about. I said adult passives, not eromenoi in general>>25033017Yeah it tends to be the effeminate domesticated societies where women rule that stigmatise homosex
>>25027838Go back to bluesky, faggot.
>>25027838This implies that their society was full of faggots so that false accusations of faggotry were believable
>>25033017"Progressive and egalitarian" puts way too fine a point on the notion that women had greater than standard recourse in cases of divorce and asset separation.
>>25027855those scrawny nerds are the same types who were seething at /fitlit/
>>25033017>even back than Nordica were very progressive and egalitarian with women and other groups.No. They were quite possibly the most hypermasculine society to ever exist. They were egalitarian in the sense that they didn't have feudalism. But they still had slaves
>>25033706Not really. You don't see actual faggotry at all in the sagas or archeological evidence. Just because something isn't prelevant doesn't mean people are aware of it. Women still existed and homosexuality, by the norse, was essentially just effeminancy, which makes what this guy>>25033407 says extremely ironic
>>25034092>>25034099If you're straight, you're effeminate. Simple as.
>>25034092Not even close Nords have always been effeminate, the Somalis in Swedrn are closer to the ancient vikings than Nords
>>25034123Not even close. The norsemen were quite literally the most hyoermasculine society to ever exist. People like you simply have not read the sagas and should not be taking part in this thread.
>>25034102That's not what the norsemen believed. They believed that gay=effeminancy
>>25034187They got dog walked amby Andalusian Muslim bvlls and Irish
>>25034123I will give you that they were egalitarian, but it was an egalitarianism that people today wouldn't find egalitarian. They didn't have landed titles and had a strong communal culture of freedmen. Less lord and serf, more patron and client relationships with a public judicial system
>>25034191I don't think they got dog walked by the irish. All i know is that Dublin was once Dyflinn, the reason Iceland has so many redheads is due to irish slaves, and that one scene is Sworn Brothers saga where Þorgeir lands in ireland and a bunch of pikemen watch him ominously from the cliff as he fixes his boat. They were used to viking raids. But viking was an occupation, not ethnicity.
>>25034202Not all norsemen are vikings. But all vikings are norsemen. Just sayin'
>>25027838Can you give us an example?
>>25028039Natural revulsion is the best possible reason. Nature is always right and being a fag is against your telos. Heal yourself from this poison before its too late.
>>25034780If there were a natural revulsion towards homosexuality, it wouldn’t be a natural feature of all non-Abrahamic societies. The revulsion is learned. The brainwashing is too strong for you to even entertain this notion however. You will just make some pious insult, completely oblivious to the virtues of your ancestors, a golem for life
>>25027838which homophobic translation are you reading?
>>25027838>Reading the sagas and I am struck by how absolutely homophobic the norsemen were.This explains why they so readily converted to Christ.
>>25027838Njal's saga is literally a critique of the hypermasculinity in the Norse culture though. The main character is a literal twink
>>25027845>t. both literally and figuratively butthurt faggot
>>25029930You and him are making the same point. He is arguing against the idea that it is the act in isolation that is disgusting. He even said>It’s the act +the gender that makes it grossand that is your argument.
The vikings were retarded and ultimately weak. Why did all those chieftains have to flee Fairhair?People who think vikings are cool don't know because they got all their viking information from movies and Agartha memes.
>>25034818The penalty for homosexual acts in traditional Germanic society was execution by drowning, stop the bullshit. In Greece it was typically execution by public torture. Stop the bullshit.
>>25036722>In Greece it was typically execution by public torture.No it wasn't. Stop making shit up faggot. Start with the Greeks already
>>25027838>I think that today we still instinctively believe that homosexuals, especially bottoms, are pathetic creaturesyes, I do. I see them like that
>>25027863The most diverse people in the world. Egill was an R1a steppe monster with dark hair. Gunnar Hámundarson was an I haplogroup small blonde twink who could jump his own height in full armor.The diversity comes from being the product of tribes who constantly migrated back and forth along the rivers of Europe.
>>25034780Little kids have a natural revulsion to fruits and vegetables despite the fact they're objectively good for you. "Nature" is not always right.
>>25027838>I think that today we still instinctively believe that homosexuals, especially bottoms, are pathetic creatures"Pathicus" is the Latin for a man who takes it up the ass. You do the math.
>>25037533Kids love fruit and vegetables are mostly useless fiber only healthy in moderation. There are reasons for natural inclinations that can be traced to productive reasons, the kind of reasoning you're presenting can be traced to decay and basing decisions on them leads to more decay.
>>25027883Based, I sometimes forget to ask the fundamental question: >Is the poster brown?To which, the answer is often yes.
>>25037477The Most deverse people in the world are Africans, not Europeans
>>25027838Discussing sexual matters on a sexually repressed board which is by definition populated exclusively by unfuckable incels is doomed to failure. The topic becomes interesting when you realize actual literature today is written and read exclusively by horny women and is de facto porn. Pornography is living art, /lit/ is just sterile inceldom.
>>25039683One of the dumbest memes ever to spread. These guys were on the same small island in the same tribe. The diversity is within the same ethnic group. Congolese pygmies and the Masai are very different because they were very isolated, which also means each ethnicity is very fucking homogenous and inbred.
>>25027838Aristophanes makes jokes at the expense of gays all the time, depilated arsehole jokes etc. Xenophon writes that gays were put to death in Sparta. The Greeks had plenty of homophobia to go with their homophilia.
>>25039749Even within small areas in Ethiopia and west Africa there is .ore diversity than Europe. European genetically are almost identical
>>25039728Then literature is dead. Because what's interesting about porn?
>>25040004>look this inbred tribe migrated close to this other inbred tribeYou are a braindead retard parroting propaganda that completely inverts measurable reality.
>>25040019>I am alienated from mainstream literary, musical, artistic, and social trends>Everyone else must just be wrong
>>25040041>Everyone else must just be wrongYes they are objectively wrong.
>>25027838Germans were the jews of the aryans and instinctively thought gay buttsex offended Indra-Yahweh.
>>25040041I was going to enter a facetious reply about how the wisdom of the masses here would lead one to conclude that Netflix originals and mumble rap are true peak artistic achievements but then unwinded the replies a bit to find out you were actually literally saying that goonette romantasy is.
>>25027863The Scandinavians outside of being gay pirates like the English were mainly country bumpkin rednecks. They succeeded because of their warrior caste system and ability to build ships and navigate the ocean, separating them from Afrikkkans, and a great deal of “buck breaking” (berserking) must have been dished out from the svennebögs on the serf class to reveal an order of rank and enforce an aristocratic, martial society.
