itt: we post photos vindicating Nietzsche's revival of physiognomy as a legitimate science.picrel: Sartre, who had a wandering eye both physically and sexually.
>>25036849That one post roasting Sarte not too long was hilarious. I should have saved it.>googly eyes shooting twin lasers of envy and resentment in opposite directionsKek
>>25036849I don't know what to think of this physiognomy, but I would not want to sit next to him on a plane or bus.
>>25036849kys, phrenologist
>>25036849this pic demonstrates that physiognomy is legit
>>25036849Idk what Nietzsche said about physiognomy buts it's definitely a legitimate thing.>t. can pretty much tell a person's personality/temperament just by looking at them with about 85% accuracy.
>>25036849his physiognomy is the sole reason his "philosophy" is so bitter, just look at this fucking retard, he was also around 5'4 in shoes. throughout most of his younger days he was invisible or even repulsive to women. only fame got him some pussy in the end, women are subhumans that will do anything for fame or money.
>>25036950Agreed.>Hell is other peopleQuasimodo would have thought the same thing when he heard footsteps toward the bell tower.
>>25036874is that logo daedalus
>>25036849I like him much more as a psychologist, physiologist, gardener.>>25036950Something funny about using Nietzscheanisms to attempt and refute Nietzsche. Like penning a Marxian refutation of Marx.
>>25036872physiognomy isn't phrenology, seetherphysiognomy is legitphrenology is not legitcraniometry is legit
>>25036966>Something funny about using Nietzscheanisms to attempt and refute Nietzsche.Pretty sure he's talking about Sartre, who was actually around 5'0" (possibly with shoes?). Nietzsche was a manlet (explains things?) but not that much of a manlet. Also, Nietzsche struggled with women to the end.
Prosopa Insights on youtube is good for that.
>>25036849>>25036861>>25036870>>25036950those guys look like how philosophers are meant to look>>25037323shut up lanklet
Actually faces can in fact predict characteristics. For example testosterone levels are reflected in the face.
>>25036849>itt we recycle the same sartre thread which discusses his face and not his literature
>>25037894his repulsive face informs his literature
>>25036849>itt: we post photos vindicating Nietzsche's revival of physiognomy as a legitimate science.it's irrefutable. meanwhile population genetics is jewish pseudoscience that undermines the role morphology plays.
>ITT: no physiognomists brave enough to post faceYou're all faggots. >no u!Physiognomy is bullshit.
What kind of philosophy would a cute person develop?
>>25037894No one reads.
>>25036966>a Marxian refutation of Marx.That can be arranged just give me your email address
Ugly people cannot create great art. Beauty can only be created by the beautiful. This makes uggos seethe but it is incontrovertible.
>>25037315Health can make someone more "handsome" but age can take all that away.Otherwise it'a all astrology
Nietzsche himself became a crosseyed tard by his end of life
>>25036874Eloi and Morlock
>>25037983Ugly cope
>>25037936just as yours informs your lonely life
>>25037979Serge GainsbourgFransisco Goya ?Yeah as I thought retard
>>25037966Especially not Sartre, the hateful and incoherent ramblings of a syphilitic madman.
>>25037894>comprehensionletIt's not a Sartre thread any more than it's a Kant thread because of the third post. The thread is very clearly about vindicating photographic evidence for Nietzsche's revival of physiognomy as a legitimate science.
>>25037963>ITT: no physiognomists brave enough to post faceExpand on the argument lurking there so we can laugh at your 70 IQ. Use your words.
>>25039263kill yourself retard
>>25037965Read St. Therese of Lisieux. Potent but simple hopeful existentialism, and whimsical too.
>>25039700
bug eyes
>>25036849>actually wrote and read books>slayed pussy>could climb a ropeSartre BTFO /lit/ on so many levels
