[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images(19).jpg (18 KB, 499x400)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
If I just say something is axiomatic then I don't have to prove shit
Checkmate
>>
but my descent is from broad-flowing Axius, the loveliest stream on the face of the earth, who begot the famous spearman Pelegon, whom they say was my father. Now, noble Achilles let us fight!
>>
>>25039091
why not just be an irrationalist so you don't have to prove shit ever
>>
>>25039091
Actual axioms aren't arbitrary, if the axiom is presupposed in any attempt to disprove it, then it's clearly self-evident. This is not true of any random assertion you pull out your ass.
>>
>>25039091
You have no duty to prove anything to anyone but yourself.

If you just like believing in stuff, well, good for you worshiper of ignorance.
>>
>>25039091
Benatar be like
>>
Can anyone explain how the root word of axiom is used in Homer to how it changes when used in mathematics
>>
File: 3285560422_bab552beda_b.jpg (77 KB, 680x1017)
77 KB
77 KB JPG
>>25039091
In that case all I have to do to refute your argument is say
>false premise
and you get BTFO
>>
>>25039513
All of my opinions are self evidently correct, QED
>>
this op is truly an axiomatic fagget



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.