Not interested in chud revisionism, just the actual campaign itself.
But anon, accurate accounts of the campaign itself and the geopolitical context ARE chud revisionism.
>>25039876Yep, OP is a chud attempting to look down on chuds like himself, which is like when cringelords call other people cringe… beyond pathetic
>>25039852you should read Churchills account of the holocaust, what he heard about it given he was commander of the UK forces and they liberated the death camps. he'd have surely written lots about it given the severity of it.surely.you'd surely be able to find his accounts of what he was told about it, given he knew all the info about ww2.surely.
It’s pretty funny. When you actually read the “campaign itself” and share your knowledge you will get called a Nazi apologist. I’m not kidding.Anyways, all in all it’s pretty hard to find an unbiased source. It just is what it is. But I found The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich to be a very in depth look not only into Hitler’s life and rise to power but also the chessboard of the world stage during WW2. It obviously has an emphasis on Germany but you will still understand what the others were doing at the time.The Unnecessary War by Patrick Buchanan is also very good. The book makes the case that WW2 was as a whole avoidable and that there was a much more dangerous enemy to the east. It again outlines what the major players were doing with a focus on Europe. Even though it’s biased (being that it’s a thesis), it still outlines the context of a lot of the decisions made in WW2 that makes people go “why the hell did [leader] make that decision?!”I’ve also heard good things about The Second World War by Antony Beevor but I haven’t read it andit’s fairly recent. Take that as you will
>>25039852Irving is not "chud" but you will have re-envision what you've been told
>>25039852WW2 is a pretty broad topic. Are you interested in the boots-and-tanks-on-the-ground combat? Pearl Harbor? the holocaust? aerial bombing campaigns? Hiroshima and Nagasaki? wartime propaganda films? the invasion of Poland?Each and every one of these topics, and more, has hundreds of books dedicated to them.
>>25039876>>25039894>>25039901>>25039952The Nazis were not the good guys. The invasion of Poland and czechia was not justified. Jews were killed for no good reason. Hitler assassinated the very men that helped him during the night of the long knives. Yes I know England was not innocent either.
>>25040048They are not the good guys but they aren't the bad guys either. Hitler was a greater man than Churchill. I don't agree with Nazi ideology or racial theories but this doesn't mean Hitler was the monster he is depicted as. He is a heroic and tragic figure like Emperor Julian.
>>25039952I’m about halfway through The War Path. Irving is a much better speaker than he is a writer. There is very little, if any, mention of DA JEWS thus far, nor any discussion of the role antisemitism played in H’s rise to power. The focus has been entirely on the rape at Versailles, acquisition of Austria being a reunification, and protection of Sudeten Germans. I shouldn’t be surprised. The reason I chose Irving is because I’d assumed he’d treat the Nazis- even if a little TOO sympathetically- as people and not Marvel movie tier insane psycho freaks. There’s a reason the explicit ethnic rhetoric of the Nazis found such fertile ground and it seems like it’d warrant a bit of attention. >>25039901>The Unnecessary War by Patrick Buchanan is also very good.Youte the second person to mentioned this recently. Added to the stack.
>>25040048>The invasion of Poland and czechia was not justified.Lmaooo
"Into the Darkness" by Lothrop Stoddard is incredible, "Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War" by Pat Buchanan is also very good but it focuses on the British side of things for the most part
>>25040048You type like you're either ESL or 105IQ
