[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_1635.jpg (254 KB, 783x1161)
254 KB
254 KB JPG
I started picrel a few days ago and I must say, it’s blowing me away. It’s wonderful and clear, it’s earnest and funny. Its intellectual honesty is surprising (at least to me).
It’s what I’ve searched for a long time. I haven’t finished it yet but I’m already looking forward to reading it again.

Has anyone else read this?
>>
>>25041360
I bought it a few years ago, but never got around to read it. Might start reading it. Thanks!
>>
>>25041360
he's an absolute moron
>>
>>25042344
Elaborate please.
>>
>>25041360
Does this book offer anything more than the normal talks about pessimism? I have it in my shelf somewhere, but haven't read it. Always thought that he comes to the main conclusion of anti-natalism, extinction of all life or just living with it. But never dug deeper. I have a basic understanding of pessimism (Ligotti, Horstmann, Cioran, Schoppi, etc). Does it offer a much different experience?
>>
>>25042499
I don’t think it’s comparable to the pessimists you’ve mentioned. Unamuno talks about the problem of human existence which develops from the opposing sides of living and thinking. He holds that in order to live a meaningful life one has to believe that the individual living experience continues after death and is not erased into nothing or merged with gods consciousness, which would render life meaningless. That the afterlife is not contemplative thinking like some scholastics would believe but real extension of life in terms of feelings, impressions and so on. Again the contrast between thinking and living is central.
Also he is a catholic, but in a very unorthodox manner.
In this book he has an essay on don quijote, who exemplifies for Unamuno the struggle of life in its tragedy.
>>
File: 2048.jpg (112 KB, 1200x900)
112 KB
112 KB JPG
>>25041360
>A few days later he confided to Nikos Kazantzakis: "No, I have not become a right-winger. Pay no mind to what people say. No, I have not betrayed the cause of liberty. But for now, it's totally essential that order be restored. But one day I will rise up—soon—and throw myself into the fight for liberty, by myself. No, I am neither fascist nor Bolshevik. I am alone!...Like Croce in Italy, I am alone!"
>On 21 November, he wrote to the Italian philosopher Lorenzo Giusso, "The barbarism is unanimous. It is a regime of terror on both sides."
>In one of his final letters, dated 13 December, Unamuno, in terms that were to be widely quoted, condemned the White Terror being committed by Franco's forces: "[Franco's army] is waging a campaign against liberalism, not against Bolshevism [...] They will win, but they will not convince; they will conquer, but they will not convert."
>>
>>25043405
Did post this in support of Unamunos stance against authoritarianism or against him?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.