[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: marx.jpg (204 KB, 690x392)
204 KB
204 KB JPG
How long will it take for someone to dethrone the king? Centuries? Millennia? Will it even happen at all? I just don't see anyone shaking Stirner's undisputed dominance.

pic unrelated
>>
>>25043261
>Everything... is... MY PROPERT!!!
already said by Hobbes
> And because the condition of Man, (as hath been declared in the precedent Chapter) is a condition of Warre of every one against every one; in which case every one is governed by his own Reason; and there is nothing he can make use of, that may not be a help unto him, in preserving his life against his enemyes; It followeth, that in such a condition, every man has a Right to every thing; even to one anothers body.
Another W for Esoteric Hobbesian gigachads
>>
>>25043267
I second this. Everything said by Stirner is implicit in Hobbes
>>
>>25043267
>>25043322
Hobbes was utterly brain broken by the "human nature" spook. He was not able to fully realize Egoism in the way that Stirner was.
>>
>>25043336
>I have based my affair on nothing
Stirner literally tells you that his entire book was shitpost at the end. what exactly is there to be 'fully realized'? what is this so called 'creative nothing'? just another spook.
>>
>>25043340
>what exactly is there to be 'fully realized'
The philosophy of rational egoism.

Hobbes' was concerned with finding/explaining a way in which actors motivated by self interest could have a functioning society and move away from the "war of all against all"/"state of nature". In other words it's a political theory for the governance of (psychologically) egoist actors and really has little to do with egoism itself.
>>
>>25043261
Klassen is the answer you're looking for.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.