[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: KkDKGRc.png (407 KB, 500x566)
407 KB
407 KB PNG
Why did all major philosophers dislike women?
>>
Plato thought it was a shame that the Athenians didn't educate women
>>
>>25050157
He also thought that if a man was evil the punishment was resurrecting as a woman
>>
I've yet to observe a single misogynist who wasn't deeply insecure. They're usually either in denial about their own homosexuality, or are afraid of the responsibilities a long-term relationship with a woman would bring.
>>
Men in the bottom pic are all closeted homosexuals
>>
>>25050191
Insecurity doesn't imply homosexuality. You sound like a woman.
>>
>>25050228
are you fucking retarded? are you illiterate? Where did I say insecure = homosexual? Did you not read the entire sentence? You sound like a taffer. I'm surprised you could even complete the captcha
>>
>>25050189
lol
>>
>>25050246
I did. Its called subtext. You implied it.
>>
>>25050135
>https://theamericanreader.com/4-june-1855-fyodor-dostoevsky-to-maria-dmitrievna-isaeva/

You ask me how I pass the time, and how I arrange my day without you. For a fortnight I have not known what to do with myself, so sad am I. If you only knew how orphaned I now feel! It is just like the time when they arrested me in 1849, put me in prison, and tore me from all that I loved and prized. So very much had I grown to you. I never looked upon our intercourse as an ordinary acquaintanceship, and now, when I no longer have you near me, I begin to understand many things.

Refuted.
>>
>>25050371
Not a philosopher
>>25050135
Nietzsche already talked about how philosophers never marry, you should look that up. The philosophical mindset is probably unnatural and has costs in terms of normal biological functioning. Its almost a curse to be a philosopher. Goethe was anti-philosophy in that he thought it was bad for youth to get into it.
>>
>>25050135
because they correctly identified them as being dumb whores
>>25050191
>bullshit freudian theories as to why someone would despise women
lol
>>
>>25050383
>Nietzsche already talked about how philosophers never marry
Retroactively refuted by Hegel
>>
>>25050135
Which is strange because Sophia is often regarded as a woman
>>
Now that the dust has settled, if you could only go to one of these gatherings, which one would you opt for?
>>
>>25050191
someone post the “how women argue” jpeg
>>
>>25050544

Def rocking with my black queens, if you make enough money to keep them stuffed with crab legs and other sea protein they will fight for you, protect you, be loyal to you like an attack dog.
>>
>>25050572
Imagine being so much of a simp that you prefer degeneracy to a prayer circle
>>
File: 1767554318019195.png (73 KB, 400x400)
73 KB
73 KB PNG
>>25050191
What if you're not really a misogynist, and don't really hate women, but you just think a lot of them seem to be stupid and retarded?
>>
>>25050590
then you get no bitches
>>
File: 1000036030.jpg (16 KB, 678x452)
16 KB
16 KB JPG
>>25050442
A woman cant be a lover of Sophia (philosopher) unless shes a lesbian.
>>
>>25050584
>Imagine being so much of a simp that you prefer degeneracy to a prayer circle

I speak of life anon, the primordial philosophy that if you feed a woman she will fight for you and bear your children. Have fun continuing the line with 5 wombless vassals.
>>
>>25050191
You can think less of women without being a full blown woman hater.
Also the reason you see these traits in misogynists is because they are the ones who are more visible. Falling for a classic selection bias.
>>
>>25050590
I've never met a genuinely intelligent man with depth who was anti-feminism. With that said, there are more artistically and intellectually inclined and interesting men than there are women because women are rewarded by men for acting retarded and punished by women and men if they actually have those drives and nourish them. This is patriarchy 101, they're not born that way.
>>
>>25050683
It's crazy people can still think the "patriarchy" is real with how biased society is towards women.
Your view is completely distorted.
Yes women are in some ways rewarded for acting stupid. But it's because they are allowed by society to act that way in the first place. They do it because it's easier and they can get away with it not because they're being forced. Women look at the world and see "hey I don't have to work that hard but I can still live comfortably" so that's exactly what they do. It's not much more complicated than that.
Men are the reverse. Men become more interesting and capable because they really are under pressure to do so. If a man acts dumb and doesn't provide value to society he's usually just ostracized and alienated. What's tolerated in women is simply not tolerated equally in men. If men were granted the leniency to act as foolishly as women don't think they wouldn't.

This all goes back to this fundamental leftist myth of hard power structures that are always magically controlling everything directly in a binary good or evil way. Something is always either oppressing you or saving you. The patriarchy is doing this or that. There's no way people are just selfishly getting away with whatever they can within the confines of a nebulous world. Something must be containing them into a little box and forcing all of their actions at all times.
>>
>>25050739
It would pay for you to think of society through a series of changes and social reactions but sure, treat everything like it's all in a timeless vacuum and abides purely by your projected internal rules and not, you know, labor and power and difference. Women and men are social categories built upon sexual difference and labor division, and the rest comes after, and has been subjected to countless changes all throughout history. No, I'm not saying sex is fake.
>>
>>25050754
Hey I'm a really nice guy. I've been playing csgo for quite a while and I'm feeling like boosting some girl gamers (preferably ones that look kinda good, I'd appreciate if you could send a picture before beginning.) and this because often when I talk to girls otherwise they don't take my csgo-skill in to consideration. Many girls through the years did friendzone me and I'm really tired of all douchebags taking the girls who deserve better, maybe you could be my gf?
>>
File: G0FylkIXQAAOith.jpg (27 KB, 436x480)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
>>25050191
Schopenhauer's mother drove his father to commit suicide and threw a party the next day, then abandoned him while he was grieving to go be a groupie slut in Weimar.
>>
>>25050760
Okay, but she was right about him in her letters to him and he spent the rest of his life seething as a result. Imagine being so annoying and insufferable your own mom hates you.
>>
>>25050590
Nta but in that case I'd think you're being at least a little dishonest. A lot of men are extremely stupid/retarded.
>>
>>25050764
what's the point of replying in her honor? even if you had a time machine and a million dollars, at best she'd give you a teethy blowjob with her herpes-infested mouth.
>>
>>25050754
Like it or not things mostly are in a timeless vacuum at least in the context of the relatively short span of human history. Humans have really not changed much in the time they've been around. Humans today are not so magically different from 100 years ago or 1000 years ago or 10,000 years ago or probably even 100,000 years ago. You can say the pressures have changed but who created the pressures? The human world is the human world and it's the same humans. It's just the same things playing out in a different flavor you're mistaking for a real change. Another common leftist fantasy: the revolution. The idea that all of these stupid struggles people keep having MUST be changing something right?
And it seems to me like patriarchy believers believe this when it suits them and throw it away when it doesn't. Oh sure the patriarchy has always been around and is as strong as ever! Men have always been oppressing women. Same old patriarchy oppressin' me like always. Ah but this past century everything is totally unique and different because "insert random marxist stuff here". The Patriarchy yeah that's timeless but not other stuff I couldn't possibly be biased towards because they're the events and ideas closest in relation to my own life.
>>
>>25050782
>everything revolves around manipulating women into sucking me off
>therefore this must be the case for everyone else
I regret coming back here, at least in 2015 the average posting age was above 20.

>>25050785
First sentence is dead wrong. History is not a series of moments happening in pure isolation unrelated to each other. If you cannot grasp this basic universal fact about history and social relations it is not only over for you but no one will ever take you seriously and you will not be capable of understanding the world either in its current state or its past states. Didn’t read the rest.
>>
>>25050790
hi sweetheart you sound really beautiful and smart that's exactly what I am looking for in a woman. I will be loyal and honest and devout and not like those assholes before me I promise. Are you free this weekend? We could see a movie and eat some gelato together and talk about books? haha lol
>>
>>25050790
>History is not a series of moments happening in pure isolation unrelated to each other
Well that's not exactly what I'm saying.
But what I am saying is that functionally there isn't much difference anyway.
You can say everything is related and connected but that doesn't change the fact it's the same meaningless repeating stuff.
Things being connected and related doesn't make them significant in and of itself.
Think of something like a checkerboard pattern. Sure the square are all connected. But take it as a whole and it's just a simple pattern for the eye to gloss over. A backdrop. A piece of filler suitable for a floor or wall. You can examine every little line that makes up those squares to your hearts content. Doesn't mean you can show me one of those lines and expect me to think it's significant and even beyond that has revolutionized the entire pattern.
>>
>>25050801
Post height and income.
>>
90% of women would say any philosophical inquiry is dumb (they don't understand it)
>>
>>25050191
You are forgetting that women genuinely suck and are annoying, and have destroyed civilization
>>
>>25050135
Forgive them, they were ignorant primitives.
>>
>>25050825
6'0
Currently am a PhD candidate in EE at a well-known uni, earning a 45k/year grad student stipend
Total 7 figure net worth tied up in crypto and precious metals
>>
>>25050590
Idk if I'd say women are all stupid and retarded but I would call them shallow and cringe. They rarely have the in depth understanding and knowledge of things that men do and a lot of their behavior is infantile. Just look at those wordchewing tiktoks for example. Those are mostly women.
>>
>>25050825
I'm a retard.
8000 p/a
>>
You faggots just need some pussy. No reason to be mad at women if you get some. You simply won’t care anymore and you certainly won’t embarrass your bloodline by arguing about them with anonymous incels on 4chan.
>>
>>25050590
>but you just think a lot of them seem to be stupid and retarded?
Even my sister seems like that to me. I think that tik tok, instagram and a lot of that bullshit fried her brain
>>
>>25050191
As if they could get a girl.
>>
>>25050191
Judging by the (you)'s on this post, you're right. A hit dog hollers.
>>
>>25051003
Get plenty of pussy. Still find women irritating and am convinced that theyve destroyed civilization.
But I see this is the state of discourse, even here now
>lol get laid incel
Its actually a pretty good exemplar of the issue. Submit to your pussy god anon
>>
>>25050191
>Beaten by mother
>Sister chosen over me, and I was punished for her misdeeds
>Girl stalked me on a bike and spit on my face
>Girls forced me to bury a dead rat
>Girls called older girls to verbally abuse: shout, etc.
>Girl clawed my face
>Girls threatened to call their gopnik posse on me if I say a bad word to them
>The only girl I thought nice played and used me to cheat in school while kissing someone who was richer and known for abusing downies
>Woman teacher in uni made fun of me for my language
>Some girl in uni lead me on then I caught her buddying with a tall buff man
>Woman at work tried to extort money through me by manipulation
>Woman lied about me to the manager because I called her the wrong word while speaking to someone else and that someone else reported to her what I said about her and I was forced to apologize for what amounted to gossip

Unlike you, I earned the right to hate women. And I wished to be a homosexual so not to deal with the crap they provoked in me but, as I discovered, it's something that is hardcoded and can't be entered into willingly.
I really wish there existed a world without women because it's obvious that women are pure demons that arouse nothing but violence in men against each other for the infinitesimal chance to stick dick in their hole.
>>25050683
All the genuinely intelligent men of the 20th century were homosexual. Like in all the ages before.
It's the first step towards intellectual greatness to realize rationally that women are dumb animals driven by emotion that are so dumb they can't separate muscular tension resulting from fear and muscular tension resulting from arousal. Hence, the romantasy and dark romance tropes and the irrational feminine drive towards broken men: that buff tattooed man who's tearing apart an animal carass with his bare hands and who is rumoured to fuck children is making my belly twist; that means I'm aroused. This is the whole simple biological retarded dumb truth why this romance pornography is popular and why women always choose the guy that will beat them within an inch of their life. Poor pattern recognition. Low IQ.
As for the second part of your post.
We live in a time when women are given unprecedented privilege, when even a woman farting or shitting is celebrated. Why haven't women still produced something on the level of Dante, Virgil, Shakespeare, Milton, Joyce? Why haven't they produced something as impactful philosophically as Hegel, Heidegger, Bergson, Derrida, Foucault? Why is all their literary and artistic and academic contribution about tits and cunt and sex (feminism, body, women in history, all which centers around their cunt), to say it generally? 50 years of sexual freedom and gender equality, and all women have produced are gossip stories (Christie), stories about children (Harry Potter), and tasteless pornography (sorry, romance).



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.