She's not a good writer and her criticisms are mostly informed by her social/political views, and I say that as someone who agrees with her.
>>25081676Is that... a woman??? Ooooooo im gonnnaaaaaa coooom
>>25081676being a good writer is hard. Even after 3000 years of written language from billions of souls that inhabited the earth, only a small handful were able to elevate themselves to greatness. Off the top of my head are Dvoretzky, Tolstoy, Bronte, Twain, Chaucer, Luo, Martin, Rowllings, Sanderson.The list is very short, but still worth an attempt
>>25081676Yeah, but she looks like a young Gillian Anderson so I'm a fan.
>>25081676she's right about functional illiteracy
>>25081676blogspot.com
Okay.
>>25081676I watched her video about female smut and it was fucking retarded. Of course women know it's not real literature, it was always intended to be porn, women are just using labels of female literature to protect what they enjoy. There is no deeper meaning to that. Most probably don't even realize what they are doing and quietly internalized it when they saw all other forms of pornography aimed at men gettign sanitized and killed off.
>>25081676Hey Peter
>>25081688>Bronte, Twain, Chaucer, Luo, Martin, Rowllings, Sanderson.Fuck no.
>>25081676She's cute and has traditional beliefs, so I would die for her. What is real hair colour though? Also, she's probably got a little of the 'tism, she's got pronunciation guides on her fantasy made up names.
>>25081859>Ga
>>25081859is she a gookboo or a chinkboo?
I haven't read her writing but some of her points are so obviously correct I don't see how you could even argue them. Like in her recent video where she says writers often make strong female characters by just masculinizing them.
>>25081676>her criticisms arePseud detected.
>>25081676She's a good writer, but not a great one. Still, even that elevates her above the hordes of slop being produced today, and her book is enjoyable enough to read. Also it's really funny watching breadtube seethe at her because they can't easily dismiss her views as that of a sexless chud incel who hates women.
>>25082143>Also it's really funny watching breadtube seethe at her because they can't easily dismiss her views as that of a sexless chud incel who hates women.I thought their canned response is to say she's huwhite, therefore still an oppressor and has internalized the patriarchy or something. Basically call her a dumb bimbo but with more words.
>>25082009I mean she is correct sure, but it's also a very obvious thing to point out.
>>25081676I've agreed with most of her takes to be quite desu, except the one about fanfiction. I thought that was retarded
>>25081859This is not terrible but could be cut down.>>25081974This is what bothers me about her writing. She's clearly a fucking oriental fetishist. I'm getting secondhand embarrassment reading it.
i watched a few of her videos half paying attention and didn't really feel strongly one way or the other at first but then i put on her video about the "sissification of villains" or some similar title and her takes on morality and "postmodernism" (which she continuously used as some cringe halfbaked """insult""") left me with the intense and nauseating realization that she is fundamentally retarded
>>25081687fpbp me too bro
She’s kind of a midwit, but I don’t care
>>25082505She already made a video about femcoomer books and I'm pretty sure she is either deliberately repressed (coom is icky) or got over-excited for the same reason all women get excited over these books.
>>25081676>and her criticisms are mostly informed by her social/political viewsSo?
>>25081676Looks okay but not interested in what she (a woman) has to say or write.
>>25081676does her book have a brown japanese in it and talk about descriptive meaningless shit? because if that is the case she glows.she looks like that type of roastie who gave up on reality after the loosening of her holes where she could see the deception of the male gaze and never recovered from it and now she finds in fantasy comfort for the fact that she will die alone.I truly think fucking her asshole doggy must be interesting but I don't think she would enjoy that as much as I would.
Problem? Again, you're making the mistake of treating women like men, they only have one value, beauty (and not just physical).
>>25081688>Off the top of my head are Dvoretzky, Tolstoy, Bronte, Twain, Chaucer, Luo, Martin, Rowllings, Sanderson.Bait
She has pink nipples and a pink pussy.
>>25081676she's read enough to have a shelf but not enough to have a crisis. chesterton on the nightstand (lmao), "the female brain" in her mouth like a host she swallowed without tasting. calls erotics degeneracy because she can't distinguish a woman writing her cunt from a woman selling it--that distinction requires a theory of language she doesn't have & won't acquire because acquiring it means sitting inside a lispector paragraph long enough to feel the cockroach move through the white paste of what you thought you were. she'd close the book. every video is the same sermon: there was a before, writing was pure, then women started wanting wrong. wittig's lovers don't represent each other; they traverse each other at molecular level until the pronoun splits. layne can't arrive at that conversation because she's still sorting books into moral & immoral while the writers who matter dissolved that binary before she was born. something in the text makes her recoil & she thinks she's defending civilization when bataille proved eroticism is continuity sought by discontinuous beings; the body in the sentence isn't pornography, it's ontology. but layne needs the stable category "female reader" to make her argument function & hilst spent decades detonating exactly that, writing god & the pig in the same mouth for the church's benefit. she performs the exact operation the text was designed to trigger. the proof is her discomfort. she belongs in the trash.
>>25081676The sort of person who can accurately critique problems is not the sort of person who is highly generative of culturally relevant content. This has been true of time immemorial.The reason Lane is important is that people on the Right have for the last 50 years or so been totally marginalized in every cultural institution. One being able to loudly criticize the fucking trash that is currently being pumped into the veins of literature is a wild anomaly, and indicative of a tide-change of which direction the culture is going.The American Left--really the Anglosphere Left in general--has lost its edge. It used to be the case that left-wing art was a biting criticism of the structure of society, but this just plainly isn't the case anymore. Every leftist author speaks with cultural authority, they speak for the Jewish establishment. When you read faggot tranny trisexual alien romances, you're reading Bill Gates' ideal future directly off the page, and it fucking sucks. Nobody wants it anymore. Lane is a mid author--Okay, but at least she sees what the problem is. The only direction that literature can go from its current milieu is into the grave, or to the Right, and those who choose the grave will cease to exist and thus only the Rightward turn is possible.It will happen. There is no other thing that can happen, and this means a return to form. I think it will take the shape of pulp, personally, which is not ideal but well within the reach of the people who are to seize it. If you wanted great literature, you should've kept women out of it. Instead you will get Robert E. Howard's spectral boot stomping on a shitlib's face for 50 years and it will, at bare minimum, be entertaining.
Why do retarded tolkiendrones like her pretend books written 70 years ago are "old literature"?
>>25084030>indicative of a tide-change of which direction the culture is going.You're far too optimistic. People on the Right have been saying this for at least 50 years now.
>>25081676is that fucking Scully
>>25084056That's because "the right" has a lot of problems that aren't going to be fixed anytime soon if ever.>anti-intellectual>anti-arts>ruling faction completely beholden to foreign interests>fringe factions are creations of the same foreign interests, which is why they spend all their time infighting instead of pushing the ruling faction to make concessions to please themThe left has been winning for the last 250 years. Any appearance of conservatives punching back is only due to the older generation resisting changes that will become inevitable once they die off and the younger generation holds power. Hate them all you want, but the left at least has a vision while the right sits around and masturbates to left wing visions from a generation ago.
>>25084072yes we all want to fuck this scully. I can't believe she's married to a chinaman too
>>25084117>she's married to a chinaman tooDropped.
>>25081676Why does her chin look thirty years older than the rest of her face?
>>25084045Because Tolkiendrones and women are afraid of anything that portrays life as anything more complex than a saturday morning cartoon.
>>25082505
>>25084020>moral & immoral while the writers who matter dissolved that binaryI know you put a lot of effort into all that bait so I didn't want (you) to go away without being told you're retarded. Now will someone please post her feet pics so we can make our final judgement and move on.
>>25084122good. i hope her husband reads your comment while she's blowing him
>>25084030Conservacucks don't produce culture. She spents all her time seething at girls actually CREATING things like young adult novels or fanfic. If anything conservacucks are known to be super anti art and anti culture.
>>25084338>Chinaman>penisPick one
>>25084315>moralcucks shouldn't be insulting others' intelligence.
>>25084407>If anything conservacucks are known to be super anti art and anti culture.Only the vocal, online ones.
>>25084407I disagree. There's plenty of underground shit.
>>25084427Even the underground shit is full of dogshit slop.Sturgeon's Law applies everywhere it seems.
>>25084117>yes we all want to fuck this scullyI didn't ask, and I especially didn't ask an ESL.
>>25084407The Lord of the Rings is among the biggest media franchises of all time.
>>25084668>Tolkien>ConservativeAnon, I....
>>25084695He wasn't a nazi, but that doesn't mean he was a progressive, anon. He was a traditionalist catholic who wrote a work based on the ancient norse epics, loved England, believed absolutely in a moral worldview of objective good and evil, and hated industrialisation. The whole progressive/conservative left/right dichotomy is enormously reductive anyway, but to imply that he believed in anything that could be construed as modern progressivism (beyond environmentalism, and even that is inherently conservative) is a lie.
>>25084315warms my heart, anon. <3
>>25084437Again I would disagree.
>>25085070If you have examples, name them. All the underground conservative authors I could find just write derivitave wheddon-tier slop.
>>25084407She has a webnovel out.
>>25085215How good is it?
>>25085491Quite good. Better than most things I've read written in the past 20 years. Her prose is fine, if a little overwrought, and the moral undercurrent is unsubtle, especially during one chapter, but it's otherwise a good read. Surprisingly enough the thing she excels most at is the politics, which involve a lot of manoeuvring and subtlety, implications and so on. The beginning is a bit slow though, but it picks up when Min-La gets introduced.
>>25081676>colored hairWhy are women so afraid to show us their true selves, anons.
>>25087628Men color their hair too. Toupees, plugs etc.>Why women concerned with looks?Again and again we ask this question. Some women look like a wreck as their "true selves" so they do a little something, some just don't.
>>25081687many such cases
>>25082471That's fine though, we need normies to teach normies to have good opinions on basic things.I watch her stuff and I find her to be inoffensive, which is basically all that she should be trying to do.And I'd breed her.
>>25084407Conservatives were the establishment for decades. They've only been the counter-culture for a few years. The future generations are going to be raised thinking that the conservatives are counter-culture, and will be making the great art.
>>25081859Most of that is sensory information and then moving the plot by asking where the smell comes from. Thats fine writing to me. It seems like a bad choice to use a block about smells as representative
>>25082009Women and hollywood need to be told that it is antifem if the only way to make a strong female character is by putting men down/being a henpecker or by being a dude.
>>25082931You can look at a published romantasy book and distill it down to script-lit. Its all about hypnotic inductions and using the smut as rewards. You tease sex scenes to maximize dopamine. You use cliches to reduce friction
>>25089444I have no faith in modern writers, left or right. What makes you think future writers will be any better?
>>25089444the man who controls the court, the legislature & the executive branch wants you to believe he's punk rock. the man who controls the satellite network & the communications platform believed it so hard he bought the megaphone. & you believed both of them. gorgeous. counterculture gets produced when the winning becomes unbearable, not when you hold a position & call it rebellion. right now the unbearable isn't wokeness. wokeness is a corporate HR seminar & everybody knows it. what comes after is the weird left, the xenofeminist demand that if biology is destiny then destiny should be hacked, queer nihilism that looks at the gender binary & treats it like a user interface for a program nobody consented to run. THAT makes both sides recoil. MAGA makes one side cheer & one side grieve. electoral politics, not art.& truly where your argument eats itself: counterculture has almost never produced great art. beats made one poem & forty years of bad novels. futurists were formally exciting & morally catastrophic & their aesthetics led directly to state propaganda. punk produced three good albums & a clothing line. what actually produces great art is obsessive formal discipline meeting private vision under whatever conditions happen to be present. dickens serialized for the middle class & built the english novel's conscience out of sentiment & fog. eliot worked at lloyds & was a monarchist & wrote the central poem of modernism between anxiety attacks. kafka filed insurance claims in prague & never published most of what he made. dostoevsky was an orthodox conservative who thought the west was demonic & proved it with the greatest novel your board has ever worshipped. mccarthy lived in el paso motels & spoke to nobody & wrote blood meridian. none of these people were counterculture. every one of them is in your canon. they were ungovernable inside their own syntax, not inside a political movement.conservative "art" being made right now (& i use the word with compassion) is decoration. classical realism revival, tradcath iconography, retvrn memes as aesthetic program. nostalgia objects. nostalgia presupposes that the best form already existed & merely needs recollection. opposite of making art. inheritance cosplaying as creation.dark woke is the counterculture because it has no audience. it makes the left uncomfortable & the right furious & the center confused. that's the test. not "who's being censored" (everybody claims censorship now; it's a currency) but who's saying something that cannot be absorbed. the thing that can't be sold back to you.
