[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: philosoraptor.0.0.jpg (77 KB, 1200x800)
77 KB
77 KB JPG
Has there ever been an author whose prose writings can crudely be boiled down to waxing on about ''muh feelings'' who you felt was justified in doing so, /lit/? Do you connect with those kinds of writers or do you altogether dismiss them as juvenile? I get the sense that everybody here mainly gravitates around concepts or plot threads as opposed to books that capture a particular maelstrom of feelings
>>
Yes and yes to the former.
>>
>>25086955
The author of my diary desu
>>
Isn't that essentially what it means to be poetic? Proustian shit or whatever
>>
that's like all of modernism, u slop consumer
>>
>>25086955
Yes, it's called The Book of Disquiet and it is a masterpiece.
>>
>>25087712
And that's precisely why Modernism sucks so bad. Except for all the funny novels, those get a big pop out of me
>>
>>25087712
based
>>25088354
berserk manga and elden ring lore will be more your speed



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.