How do you reconcile philosophy with evolution?
>>25089995Profane, both of them.
>>25089997Based
>>25089995Is/ought
>>25089995it's hard to imagine why, as the effect of natural selection, humans developed such irrational brain
>>25089995By a being a progressive.Since there is overwhelming evidence that mankind has undergone biological evolution then there is strong cause to believe it has and will socially and morally evolve too.
>>25089995What's the conflict exactly? How should I live? I am to be a good human, that is all https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleology
>>25089995If you are to stupid to figure this out on your own you don’t deserve an answer. Kill yourself troglodyte.
>>25089995Empiricism/physicalism
>>25090020In a good way though? Or will humans simply become, like dogs, bred to never mature emotionally?
>>25089995this has never been a problem since the days of the ancient greeks
>>25089995what's there to reconcyle? The randomess of natural selection is already implied in early Greek atomistic system, and its entirely coherent with most materialist and nominalist philosophical systems. I have read both the Origins of the Species and Voyage of the Beagle, and both are highly philosophical books - the second is also especially well written, so I'd recommend them to anyone. I do not see where do you imagine a contrast between evolution and philosophy - except for the fact that you have not read any philosophy or any text on evolution.
>>25089995You don't reconcile them as if they're rivals. They operate at different levels.
>>25089995There is no evolutionary explanation for consciousness, libtard.
>>25090117>The randomess of natural selection is already implied in early Greek atomistic systemGreek atomism is false you braindead NPC.
