Currently sitting in a busy mall reading Evola
>>25102067How's the weather in Sao Paolo today?
>young 20s>slowly transitioning from porn and anime into lit>just out of school>white>le society imprisons muh natural impulses>STEMmieanything else?
>>25102067You're going to get so much pussy bro
>>25102067you are posting frogs on 4chan
>>25102143Currently waiting outside the mall waiting for you to come out so I can rape you
>>25102156You missed better luck next time bitch
>>25102156I just saw him leave Claire's with a new earring, he looks adorable
>>25102067Alright Evola anon, I asked you but you didn't ask me? I'll give you an answer, but I can't provide much in explanation, priors and all. So, if one conspirator makes it to subsistence then it becomes a race for the others to get it. This is one of those you don't want to be the last guy scenarios but there isn't really an advantage for first. China hit it, so you can stop looking there, unfortunately authoritarianism is one of the things that does require legitimacy for certain claims, otherwise you go back to magic. The US claimed one but didn't have one, so either the narrative is accepted or it isn't. These are unlikely cases, rise of authoritarians sure, rise of fascism far less likely. If you want to look for a place where it is likelier then look to origination, you should be looking at Europe. Until it happens I don't know, same as you. I'm not going to entertain your lack of a parabola. You want the correspondence though and I can offer that. Marx thought subsistence predated capitalist methods of production. If they are re-occuring then commodification cred is being lost in favor of "freedom" cred. This is a paradox for him. This is the "alpha" for your particular question.