[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: lort.jpg (125 KB, 1024x700)
125 KB
125 KB JPG
The book is better, it's just hypocrisy and a refusal to make the story interesting and funny
>>
>>25123305
What a drama queen. The book is slow and plodding. Characters are underwritten. Villain is awful.
>>
>>25123305
He's right. All lotr media after the movies came out only cared about the war stuff and how cool Gandalf and Legolas are.
>>
>>25123660
I would like a cooking show from the hobbits.
>>
>>25123309
>slow
Serious
>>
>>25123309
adhd cockroach
>>
>>25123309
I needed breadtubers talking in the background to get through the first chapter. Something about Hobby Town or some such 67 nonsense.
>>
>>25123309
>he thinks books should be paced like movies
You're exactly who Tolkien Jr was talking about.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.