What the fuck was Marx doing
Just being descended from people who don't much care for European stock, no siree.
Do communists have any real justification for the fact that the founder of their entire ideology was a jobless layabout who mooched off his rich friend?
>>25126542>be marxs daughter>kys>not once but twiceKeeeeek
>>25126542>>25126552>NOOOOO WHY WASN'T MARX A HOPLESS WAGIE LIKE ME
>>25126552leonardo da vinci was the same way, patricians dont have to work when wealthy people can fund them.
>>25126552He wasn't a prole, but he was a serious man of letters. No one can say that a guy who wrote tens of thousands of pages was lazy
>>25126642Neets on chan write more. Also his own publisher thought he's lazy
>>25126645>his own publisher thought he was lazyyeah no shit the person who wanted to use him to make money thought he didnt work hard enough thought that. your boss thinks the same about you wagie
>>25126654It's not like he didn't try at honest job. His jew banker uncle used nepotism to let him work in the bank, it was too much for this literal nigger. Yeah fuck capitalism sent from IPhone
>>25126645>Neets on chan write moreNot even close to being true. The Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe runs 114 volumes and tens of thousands of pages. Anon types "Seethe", "Cope", and "Based" 100 times a day, filling a quarter page at most if you lump them all together
>>25126674>gazzilion tones of retards exchanging emailsLet me guess, you read it all
>>25126674seethe and cope.
>>25126552Well, Engels admitted that his gains from exploiting the labor force at his factory were ill-gotten in the first place.Are you capable of following this logic or do you need more assistance?
>>25126552That's most successful artists from before WWII. The aristocracy subsidized the artistic class before capitalism subsumed art and became its sole patron. The only difference between Marx and most philosophers is that a patron was subsidizing his work instead of a university.
>>25126552Do anticommunist have any real justification for the fact that they will dismiss any communist figure because of their economic status, often contradicting themselves?If you're a communist and you're poor you will be dismissed because you're assumed to be lazy, entitled, jealous of other's people success and if you're a communist and you're not poor then you will be dismissed because you're assumed to be a poser, a sheltered person, an hypocrite and someone that secretly hates the working class. Can some anti-communist explain why they employ such thought terminating cliches, typical of television educated boomers and other such easily propagandized people? I'm not even a communist and I'm tired of this stupidity
>>25126722i reject it because it is fucking retarded
>>25126542He was busy being a jewish wordcel while letting his family starve.
>>25126552Communists are not capable of having the cognitive processes which enable them to even think “hmm, I should read primary sources about what this guy and his life was really like”.And even if they do they’ll still externalize blame onto something else.
>>25126679Even just Marx's works published in his lifetime would be a couple thousand pages. Meanwhile anon is still drafting chapter one of his novel after 10 years of development
>>25126552>writer spends his time writingIsn't that obvious? Marx isn't a Joe Hill kind of guy, no one remembers him as a famous worker
>heh heh Marx was a neet just like mestupid revisionism, bro wrote for the New York Tribune ffs.
>>25126629Leonardo da Vinci didn't wordcel extensively about how those patricians and wealthy people need to all die for the sake of international judaism though
>>25126722>Can some anti-communist explain why they employ such thought terminating cliches, typical of television educated boomers and other such easily propagandized people?because it keep its simple and, much to your possible, or not, dismay, it holds truth
>>25126893pretty sure you need to read anon's whole post again, buddy.
>>25126781this, he was a serious journalist to the side of all his political economy works, none of which retards here have read. 98% of anti-communism is literally programming implanted into peoples heads by their retarded grade school womyn teachers growing up. the biggest tell on anti-communism is how often it was aligned with the mafia throughout the cold war.
>>25126916i read it all buddy, and it doesnt need any more of my attention. communism fails not only as a system, but also morally, for the same reasons that anon listed. communism as an ethical set of rules to how a state should go crumbles because nobody, absolutely nobody, can fulfill what communism asks them to do, not for long at the very least.much like religion, it asks you, and everybody else, to be perfect and if that doesnt happen, well
>>25126732did it ever occur to you that actually well read people dont often post here, and that you are a retard?
