I want to buy a physical copy of the original KJV text and outlook (gothic writing, drawings, etc.).What edition does offer this? So far I have looked into The KJV Store and they seem to have quality editions, albeit a bit expensive.If you have any suggestions from where to order such an edition as I described in the first paragraph (The KJV Store or some other website), please let me know.
>>25154193https://www.eastonpress.com/deluxe-editions/the-king-james-bible-the-1611-edition-3962.html
>>25154209You know, that's actually kind of cool, but way too expensive
That's called a facsimile print
>>25154396Now that I've learned something new, I demand a miracle. I want a custom printing place that doesn't charge a kidney and will print on scritta with a faux leather cover so I can have bible style versions of my favourites.
>>25154193Is there anything wrong with this one?https://www.thekjvstore.com/1611-king-james-bible-original-facsimile-black-softcover/
>>25154193>hebrew in the skyit was cooked from the beginning. If you dont start from koine greek translations you are crypto kikes no matter how much you call yourself christians.
>>25154193Honestly I get the impression you are fucking around from this thread, so I would not bother with a printed version and just stick with the pdf from internet archive til you get tired of it. Rather save yourself some money and donate to get some Appalachian peasants a Proper Bible in hand.
>>25154193>drawingsThe Barnes & Noble edition has the illustrations/engravings by Gustave Dore.https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/holy-bible-gustave-dore/1119356295
>>25157377True. If you have to go with English prints, though, the best method would be to simultaneously read:>the Douay-Rheims version>the Geneva version>the King James version (limit yourself here to the New Testament) ONLY with footnotes pertaining to the Codex Vaticanus, Codex Sinaiticus, and Codex AlexandrianusMake sure each you pick out the earliest version recorded in publication for each of these Bibles, and that the copies you get are annotated well. Cross reference as much as possible
yhe binble
Pre-Challoner Dhouy Rheims.
>>25158135The KJV is so vastly superior to the Douay-Rheims as a literary work, in terms of both quality and influence, that recommending people to avoid its entire Old Testament is really unpardonable advice. If you have a quibble with the translation, make it known for someone to be aware of while reading the OT, but don't direct them away from it entirely.
>>25154193Don't bother, just read the NASB translation
>>25159096Good point, my post applies a narrow viewpoint to the KJV. The reason I restricted it to the NT was my inability to find any translation of KJV's OT with notes sourced from the codices. I'll need to research better on this
>>25157377imagine thinking greek of all languages has more value than Hebrewgo read the Book of Maccabees you degenerate pagan
