[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: big brain kantkant.jpg (46 KB, 900x600)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
No I haven't read Kant, I will, but I'm reading other stuff and this dichotomy keeps popping up
>>
one is cuz

the other is duz
>>
i think schopenhauer says its all the same shit desu but lk idk
>>
>>25161043
Have you tried asking grok?
>>
Reason's out in the wild. These 'AI' LLMs 'have reason'. Understanding is what directs and synthesizes it (is part of/necessary to Subjectivity/Sentience).
>>
Vernunft = rationality
Verstand = intellect
>>
>>25161221
yea I did, but it never "clicks". I like to ask question to people to see variations of perspectives, to see what examples they come up with, it's best if conflict arise as well with people realizing they didn't really understand the concept in all its depths
>>
>>25161043
Reason:
Thing->thing->thing->thing->thing
Understanding:
Actually fucking knowing what something means
>>
>>25161043
omg this is actually not easy enough to post it here just google it for god sakes...

understanding synthesizes experience while reason goes beyond it



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.