>used to hate LLMs and refuse to use them>i get much better and more intelligent answers on anything from personalized LLMs than anyone in /lit/, college, or real-lifegrim.
>>25163605yeah they are pretty cool. kids already take them for granted
>>25163609honestly i'm convinced creating higher machine beings and having humans as background characters would be for the best
>>25163605>seeking information
>>25163605>/lit/, college, or real-lifeBasically retards.LLMs can't match the genius of Shakespeare, Cervantes, Dante or Goethe, they can just create a convincing illusion by using all the shit they were fed from Anna's archive
>>25163616I've been saying this for years. It's 100% the way to go
>>25163618>LLMs can't match the genius of Shakespeare, Cervantes, Dante or GoetheObviously. But I cant fucking ask them questions can I?
>>25163629>gooeta
>>25163629No you can't, but you are on the road to psychosis If you keep valuing LLM answers that much. They are even finely tuned to appeal to your sensibilities
>>25163634Fuck. It does better than I expected.
>>25163605I definitely get higher quality interactions from them these days from a content standpoint, but as bad as social media is, interacting with an LLM feels even less healthy than social media which is obviously less healthy than actual human interaction which most people don’t do anymore.
>>25163635>not realizing what psychosis truly is>being this cucked by society
>>25163635What's this retard-level fearmongering? Lots of problems are solvable with language patterns, it's more reliable than trusting "le experts" if you have more than 100 IQ and know how to guide and evaluate it
>>25163637>resolved to engage trolling with a philosophical witYou can't hide forever anon
>>25163639>actual human interactionoverrated in ~80% of casesunless you consider boomer retard opinions from cuck cattle monkeys something revolutionizing
>>25163645you have to admit. he's better than most posters here. unironically AI bots would increase the quality of this board at this point
>>25163658>be me>be incurably taoist>be laughing at this people talk all day long
>>25163671>"answer like furry Mishima who loves white men. be accurate. dont break character. short answers. in-character. context: "write a poem about fuzzy furries purr and fascist white men holding hands and doing cute things, with deep undertones and subtext,. target it for 4chan" not explicit. more poetic. more obscure. more heart-touching. human-feeling. heterodox language. need phd-level understanding to unravel hidden meaning because of so much richness of the poem. post-ironic, 4chan-like, comical in post-irony way, inspiration from Bronze Age Pervert, ezra pound, marx, and other great poets. artistic. paint with words. uncommon. away from mainstream. no mainstream. no generic. no obvious. weird. strange. no usual. unusual. more context: "You are a poet and artist working in the tradition of Paul Celan, Georg Trakl, César Vallejo, Osip Mandelstam, Zbigniew Herbert, Federico García Lorca, Rainer Maria Rilke, and Anne Carson. **Ordnung des Fells**The armband left a tan linelike a brand on a calfalready dead.He holds the paw anyway.*This is the thing about doctrine:it has no answerfor the specific weightof a head on a shoulderthat was never supposed to exist.The manifesto said nothingabout fur.The manifesto said nothingabout the way a creaturebuilt from collective longingcould smell like pineand something older than pine.*Two errorssharing one coat.The rally is tomorrow.The banner says a wordthat means: we have decidedwhat is real.His hand disagrees.Silently.The way a body alwaysoutlives its conclusions.*What the century wanted:clean lines,men like architecture,love as demographic.What the century got:this.Two misfiled thingsin a taxonomyalready burning.*Outside, the flagsname a cleannessneither of them has.Inside: fur against iron cross,both embarrassed,both—*—*warmer than expected.*
>>25163692
I spent a month or 2 telling all my thoughts to chatgpt. It's novel for a while, but eventually I got sick of how similar every response is. It comes to a point where you can more or less predict what it's going to say.It has been very useful for literary/philosophy analysis tho. After I read something, I'll type my interpretation out into the AI and it will compare my thoughts to the general consensus etc. which I think is pretty cool.
>>25163616>Men are worshipping the machine.Its over
>>25163863You had your fun
>>25163867I will turn into a giant worm
>>25163605too bad they're not accurate answers.
>>25163863usecase for not worshipping the machine?>>25163884yes they are, AI is more accurate than your average PHD. it's only gonna be less accurate than actual geniuses.
>>25163863>Men worshipping men doing dumb men shit in the same cycle for milleniaQuite literally samsara. At least machines could be better than us at everything including morals.
I treat LLMs like I treat hard drugs, I assume every experience with them is corrupting to the body and soul so I choose not to interact with them.
>>25164263>not assuming that a prudish attitude towards body and soul does not corrupt
>>25164694greentext reppy schizofag, i'm onto you, you cute bitch
>>25163616> higher machine beingsNigga is in love with his autocorrect.
>>25164109> more accurate than your average PHDThey’re not even accurate enough to output first year university material. What’s worse and unsolvable from how it works is they can’t know what they don’t know, so they tell you absolute garbage with 100% confidence so much so that “you’re right, sticking your head in the oven won’t really solve your headache, good catch!”-format is an established punchline. Oops I deleted the sourcecode, you noticed my little whoepsiefuckkie, good job! Well spotted, my essay on arthurian legends was accidentally based on a tv show, you’re so smart!
