The issue with philosphers is that they are so far up in their own asses that they fail to see what is right and front of them. Philosophers like Plato or Kant spend countless hours arguing over what the meaning of live is, meanwhile regular people have been actually living that meaning in the real world. Human nature shows us way more objective truths than any brainiac ever could. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8aWBcPVPMo
>>25169002If that's a cute boy with a small, caged dick on the right, then that is indeed the meaning of life
>>25169002If eden ivy was in front if me I would really go far up her ass
>>25169002philosophy isn't about the nature of steaks
>board claims to read "literature">hasn't read the complete study on Finnish Whale Milk from Ohta, et al.>in fact, hasn't read a single scientific paper at all in full/sci/GODS could easily take over and improve this board, but the return would still be well below our time of day. Watch yourselves, /lit/faggots. Watch yourselves.
>>25169050>in fact, hasn't read a single scientific paper at all in fullSez whohttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.00483
>>25169050improve it? in what sense? in a sense that increases the number of nuclear weapons and whale milk studies? that's not what i would call an improvement
>>25169010Your father wants to kill himself because of your existence
>>25169002>meaning of liveGet the fuck out ESL retard
>>25169060>Sez whoIs that a Pynchon reference? Nice, anon. He's my favorite writer.>>25169010>If that's a cute boy with a small, caged dick on the right, then that is indeed the meaning of lifeBruh, I'm 100% straight, but I would suck her dick and swallow her cum if she looked like that and had a dick. I've been wanting to hire a femboy escort but I'm too cowardly.
>>25169060I yield, anon. You have become... /litsci/...
>>25169002The universe doesn't think. So the answer is the one that doesn't require thought.
>>25169002Kant wouldn't have wondered what the meaning of life is which is an existential question. Plato didn't really either, after all wondering what the "meaning of life" is assumes that the answer isn't given transcendently and subject to scientific investigation, but is rather an opinion question about how best to live your life under metaphysical uncertainty.If the question is about Kant, both the questioner and Tardman don't get it. Kant is interested in how experience is packaged prior to cognition - that experience seems to have space and time woven into it before it appears in the mind ( the steak and the light are both equally real or illusory.) This epistemological demotion of space and time has a profound influence over physics - see Einstein.
>>25169002You're mistake is conflating different orders.For many people, sex and worldly delights will be tantamount to the "meaning of life".For those more in sympathy with their higher nature, that doesn't suffice.If you feel you don't need philosophical or religious explanations for things then so be it. There isn't a "one size fits all" approach for all types of people. The ideology of human sameness is false.
>>25169002We need a biologist that wanted something more in life and turned into philosopher
>>25169010Alot of chasers on this board.Interesting.
>>25169141The true combo is /fitlitsci/ anon. Maybe add /ck/ for good measure. But no fast food
>>25169002define "meaning"
>>25169981Im so tired of americans.
>>25169985Why?
>>25169002god, what a charlatan. even in the realm of philosophy he has to ape his betters (wittgenstein). life is not a thing that means
>>25169002It's clear that you read neither.
>>25169002>Philosophers like Plato or Kant spend countless hours arguing over what the meaning of live isLmao. Has this board always been so fucking shit? Does anyone on here even read?
>>25169981>another girl i know is a perfect blonde doll trump supporter who had multiple older black bfs in high school & would go out and party with him and his friends. she's told me shes been gangbangedproven correct yet again
>>25169981What are you doing on this board?
>>25169050I remember getting into a similar discussion about the nutritional value of seal milk in a /vp/ thread....Well, I say "getting into" a discussion, but I was more just posting "boobs seal" and about how much I wanted to have sex with it while the discussion happened around me.
>>25169981Is that you nick fuentes?
>>25169002Man, I hate people like OP who genuinely believe they are smart when they convey the most retarded shit imaginable that outs them to anyone who has actually read the men he criticizes as a bumbling moron. In a truly just and well-ordered society, men like him would be forced to crawl for the rest of their meaningless lives.
>>25169002>abstract vs actual
>>25169050no /sci/fag has ever read an academic paper
>>25170051Trumpists are fascists?
spice won't make the pasta less stale
>>25169981demoralization
>>25170280No, check the early life of the author
>>25169985We're tired of you, so the feeling is mutual. Thats why we bomb your countries in search of oil. Where you see your homeland, we see dollar signs and Super Walmarts. Your existence is a threat to the almighty dollar. Gotta make that bread!
>>25169002>The issue with philosphers is that they are so far up in their own asses that they fail to see what is right and front of them.No, that's the problem of non-philosophers.>Philosophers like Plato or Kant spend countless hours arguing over what the meaning of live is, meanwhile regular people have been actually living that meaning in the real world.They didn't really. They mostly argued about the nature of life, rather than its meaning.>Human nature shows us way more objective truths than any brainiac ever could. If I may, the psychology was in the realm of philosophy for longer than it was in the realm of science.Also, the guy's answer to the question was kinda dumb. If you're wearing VR goggles and see steak, that doesn't mean it's actually there. Likewise, if you eat a steak, do you taste the steak or just the sensation of one? It's just a le hecken "We're in the Metrix" puzzle but the guy doesn't get it.
>>25170293what the heck is that?
>>25169981Yeah but asian women prefer white women though XD
Test
>>25170347where can I see them having sex with one another?
>>25170295It's extra strange since Reich was also what many today would call a fascist. A homophobe and strict monogamist.
>>25169981You're really just going to say that you have all these videos without showing us any? Because I call bullshit otherwise.Anyway, I wonder what goes through the minds of cuck fetishists whenever they see a man of their own race with a gf. It must be pretty painful.
