[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: ed3.png (12 KB, 761x891)
12 KB
12 KB PNG
Genre fiction and litfic are neither good or bad. They are merely indifferent. People who grasp for them, saying "this is good, that is bad" are delusional animals.
>>
File: RQ_1967_03_L.jpg (847 KB, 1555x2500)
847 KB
847 KB JPG
>>25172067
seems to me worth preserving the idea that pushing forward the history of culture is a more interesting goal for a text than appealing to consumer desires. i say this as a huge fan of pulps.
>>
>>25172074
>pushing forward the history of culture is a more interesting goal
This shall remain quiet and meaningless until you clarify what "pushing forward the history of culture" means.
>>
>>25172067
Moreover, all "literary" works may be found to have generic qualities which tie them to a tradition of storytelling, hence making the distinction moot



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.