[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1000016081.png (340 KB, 1080x486)
340 KB
340 KB PNG
Do we have to become Nietzsche stans now?
>>
On Saturdays I'm Nietzscheian. On Sundays I'm Kierkegaardian. On Weekdays I'm Heideggerian.
When I go to the toilet I'm Kantian.
When I get a conscription letter, I turn full Stirnerite.
>>
>>25177297
I honestly friggin doubt it
>>
File: 1000016082.jpg (119 KB, 828x737)
119 KB
119 KB JPG
>>25177414
Explain this journal then...
>>
He's more based then. Women are useless
>>
A lot of great thinkers have an odor of homosexuality. That’s why it doesn’t bother me that my whole huge extended Catholic family think I’m a closet-case because at 45 I have never had a gf. The truth, that I find women annoying, is boring in comparison.
>>
>>25177442
This is too fucking cryptic for me. He’s referring to levels of irony and without expanding on an example. So he writes “my lover”, that means a much as anything he wrote here.
>>
>>25177710
Yeah Kierkegaard writes in spirals because he thought it was the only way to deal with smug, self-important Hegelians. He out-Hegels them basically by turning Hegel’s dialectical logic against them. If you take dialectic seriously it does not lead to these neat Hegelian conclusions, everything is dialectical and it doesn’t make sense. Hegel lets the genie out of the bottle a millimeter and then bottles him back up, Kierkegaard lets him run and turns him to the service of Christianity. It’s a submarine attack.
>>
>>25177722
He does seem to be hinting at some relish for being a double agent of sorts in the excerpt. He’s not clear about what he seeks to undermine besides people’s perception. He could be alluding to homosexuality, or some pseudo religious seduction, but whatever it may be, he only vaguely implies what.
>>
File: 1759301567552787.jpg (991 KB, 3456x2304)
991 KB
991 KB JPG
>tfw even if you become a great writer hundreds of years later people will still think you're gay because you're not good with women
>>
>>25177777
That passage itself is not hard to read. Irony means irony, he writes ironically, his books are pseudonymous and none represents himself (except the sermons). The apparent gayness is probably from being ripped out of context (the ‘lover’ of his writings or something). Even if he was gay he would have never openly admitted it.
>>
>>25177812
If you describe how repulsive and incellish you are, it will make sense.
>>
>>25177816
>Irony means irony
Got it. All clear now.
>>
>>25177442
I don't need to explain shit



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.