>read Montaigne's Essays>it's a "muh Noble Savage" chapter>"Actually, we are more barbaric">"Actually, what we did in the Spanish Inquisition is more barbaric">"Actually, eating the flesh of a dead man is more barbaric than cannibalizing and torturing a man while he is still alive">"Actually, what they do isn't barbaric because the people they torture and eat want it to happen to them out of pride and loyalty to their tribe">"This is what makes them noble"
>>25178958Read up on what people were up to during the European wars of Religion. He was 100% correct in his assessment. In the Netherlands we cannibalized a regent because he was blamed for a war not going well even though it was not really his fault. this lynching was done with significantly less dignity than the tribes Montaigne is talking about. Similar deeply inhuman phenomena were not uncommon during that period with entire pogroms of protestants against Catholics and vice versa.
>>25178958>man witnesses horrors perpetrated by his countrymen and neighbors, calls them barbaric>is he right? no, he must be wrong about the thing he personally lived throughyou people are so interesting to me
>>25179483>man hears about horrors another nation commits across a vast sea?>are those people horrible?>no, they are nobleAre you a liberal? Because you're pretending you don't know what I'm talking about in an attempt to make discourse as difficult as possible.
>>25178958>it's a "muh Noble Savage" chapterYouTube / reddit analysis must perish.Labeling something and already having a conclusion before even trying to understand what the author wants to say is the opposite of what reading is about. Try using reason and arguments for opposing the author's view.
>>251796574chan "analysis" must perish. Saying you're wrong and leaving it at that is low IQ. Demonstrate your understanding by giving a detailed counter argument with citations of the source text to back up your argument.
>>25179644>rather than thinking about what I'm reading, or thinking about what you said, here's me regurgitating a shitter screenshot that I thought sounded insightfulyeah, this is about what I expected. in a week you'll finish the rest of his essays and start screeching about how the translators made him pozzed n woke n cringe n sheit or something equally retarded
>>25179758The screenshot correctly described you and how you act though. Not his fault you're that brainless.
>>25179767>still not thinking for yourselfso desperate for someone to tell you what to do
>>25179772>Intentionally misunderstand point in response to OP.>Get corrected by him and called an intentionally dense faggot referencing a correct observation about you made by someone else.>Heh, that observation that everyone felt intuitively about me already was summed up at some point by another. That means it's bad or something.Retarded faggot lmao. Liberals defend themselves in the dumbest fucking ways, just complete nonsense every time.
>>25179657You read?
>>25179846I TTS AI summaries
>>25179483He can say whatever the fuck he wants about his countrymen, the slip up comes with proclaiming savages on another continent he knows fuckall about are actually good people despite what you've heard.We're still dealing with the noble savage crap today with people beatifying low iq stone age people who butchered each other routinely. You can't fucking talk about slavery outside the context of colonialism bad and white people bad, even though it predated huwitey even stepping foot on the continent, and kept going after the west tried to eradicate its existence.
>>25179803now we're samefagging because we're feeling called out and upset lol
>>25179858>There can't be more than one right-winger on 4chan!!! No way someone else found me retarded and annoying!!!More nonsense. I accept your concession to all my points and invite you to neck yourself, as you are clearly a troon.
>>25178958Jew author>>25179189Jew religion
>>25179868>oh yeah? oh yeah? well... well... uh... YOU'RE A TRANNY!!!lmao obsessed
