Are there any good essats or books that push strong arguments and reasons as to why traditional gender roles are superior to the modern version of womens roles and womens liberation?Stay at home mom = strong children =strong community=happy and healthy peoplesMother raising kids> the state raising kidsPerhaps even some writings that breakdown the mind of people that seem to be so bothered by these ideas
>>25185343Of course not, and for the same reason there are no decent books promoting "traditional" farming with wooden plough over the tractor and industrial farming. Gender roles are not a biological constant.
>>25185412This kills the Chud.
>>25185343Its another >here are my pre-concieved notions, please provide me with books that confirm exactly thatThe problem with your notion in particular is that its rather common, inane and intellectually weak. you'll find some version of this idea muttered by conservatives all throughout history, but most thinkers worth their salt have the dignity to not turn it into a full polemic.
>>25185343Evola's Eros and the Mysteries of Love.>>25185412Read Lord Northbourne.
>>25185427Nope, you're just ignorant.Male-female polarity and the roles that correspond with them is a huge topic. I could give you enough books on the subject to fill a library.
