What do we rate the tastes of Labour MPs in 1906?
>>25186084Performative nonsense, other than the 22 real ones who stood up and bravely promoted The Bible and John Bunyan.
>>25186084Pretty weird to think that there was ever a time when Carlyle and Mill were seen as brothers in arms so to speak rather than archetypical opposites as the ur-chud and the ur-shitlib.
>>25186091sadly if such a poll were taken today, the bible would be absent and number one would be a tight race between the koran and the vedas
>>25186084The lack of Jane Austen is really pissing me off.
>>25186092It is weird to think, because it's something you just concocted in your confused mind. They are unambiguously elitist-coded and liberalist-coded respectively, unlikely to be appreciated by the same people much less considered compatible.
>>25186084>Adam SmithImagine a modern Labour MP admitting to that.
>>25186084We need more Carlyle Labourists.
>>25186164Adam Smith was a necessary forefather to Karl Marx. He was also a proto-Georgist.
>>25186091Answering "The Bible" in response to the question "Who is your favorite author?" doesn't even make sense