>read The Sorrows Of Young Werther>it's proto-simp literature of its time>read Elective Affinities>it keeps getting more and more ridiculous in its moral whitewashing of its characters with every chapter>keep waiting for some sort of divine punishment or moral>end up with a sequence where within 5 or so pages a baby has died, the culprit is forgiven, the parents feel glad it's gone and they're all just horny to fuck each other now that the baby is out of the way>main heroine again an heroes >there's no moral>apparently wanting to divorce your wife to fuck her nubile niece and wanting to divorce your husband to fuck his friend is based and properWtf? I am now very hesitant to move onto Faust. It seems to me Goethe was literally just a simp who placed some cringy love above everything. I expected more but these are literally just romanceschlock for moids instead of foids. The more old and revered literature I read, the more I keep getting >my friend>my love>oh dear gracious God>loving sure is good and the bestest best, surely you agree my friend>yes my friend whom I loveJesus Christ, where are the actually interesting characters and plots?
>>25187262You seem brainrotted
>>25187262goethe is a dummy
>>25187262Muh moralsHylic
>>25187262>>loving sure is good and the bestest best, surely you agree my friend>>yes my friend whom I loveThis but unironically.A philosopher who hasn't known heartache (like Kant, Schoop, Nietzsche) have never known true reality.Why Schelling supersedes them all.
>>25189495>nietzscheSalome?
>when will this book finally get to longhousing me into accepting a moral lesson
>>25189495They were more austere and cerebral. I prefer that.
>>25187262Says the homosexual of soul like the OP
>>25189495Of course Schopenhauer and Nietzsche knew heartache.
>>25187262>when will yahweh strike down these wicked sinners for having desireSuffice to say Faust will also be lost on you.
