why is publishing 100% leftist
>>25189388because the right got taken over by "it's the economy, stupid" NPCs
>>25189392/thread
>>25189388You're the average of your 5 closest friends. Show me an offline right wing circle where more than 1 person doesn't think the arts are a waste of time or questions the sexual orientation of someone wanting to be an author.All the right wing artsy people died in Vietnam and there was never any new stock.When you don't have a network you don't have power. Simple as.
>>25189388thats just a stupid statementlots of righties publish and get books bought by PACs to get on best sellers listsyou dumb fucking fuck
>>25189405You're not far from wrong. Out of all my pals, I know 2 others who are right-wing and artsy. And as you can imagine, we don't get invited to a lot of artistic events involving mutual friends/acquaintances, despite on a whole being objectively more talented than most of them; who write freeverse slop poetry akin to Rupi Kaur and makes music about class conscious issues in the most boring way possible.It's 100% about networking, and as left-wing values makes it easier to establish more artsy friends (most left-wing people value creativity despite never seriously engaging with creative ideas, they just enjoy the aesthetic of being creative), it is easier for them to form networks.
>>25189388Leftoids treat their politics as religion and ban dissidents accordingly
because the right wants to suppress art
>>25189388buckley - God and man at yalepaul elmer more - aristocracy and justicerevilo oliver - americas decline>>25189405>arts are a waste of time as they go to church and sing the hymns with the congregation>questions the sexual orientation of someone wanting to be an authoraquinas didnt have to take that vow of chastity to dedicate his life to writing the summa, he was the junior son on an aristocrat anyway, and the xp section about marriage might of been better if he hadn't've stayed unmarried
Fabian capture of the institutions.
>>25189388>>25189515Identical tactics as Christians in fourth century. Went from a minority of no more than 20% to over 60% by the 5th century, in the 6th they became 90% thanks to Justinian Plague. Though there were still pagans in remote place in the middle ages.
>>25189388Right wingers are too busy banning books.
>>25189388Its why I self publish. I don't necessarily care about sales, most philosophers and historians make their mark posthumously and I just feel good about being creative.
>>25189515Few point this out
>>25189405There are effete right wing intellectuals who read the neoplatonists and debate each other over catholic dogma, and then there's the reactionary base which is an Amazon Prime cargo cult which is content with ai slop songs about Charlie Kirk and Kincade paintings.These two groups are culturally irreconcilable. The base think the intellectuals are faggots and the intellectuals pretend to have a noble savage view of the base but ultimately must sublimate their contempt by directing it at libtards, queers, "dinergoths" etc.
>>25189564>Amazon Prime cargo cult which is content with ai slop songs about Charlie Kirk and Kincade paintings.Huh?
>>25189388because liberals read and conservatives watch TV. you've fallen for the 4chan "the right are the REAL guardians of western culture" meme. like it or not, the vast, vast, vast majority of people who care about literature, poetry, art, philosophy, etc are left-wing. the people who can confidently answer "who are Heidegger, Browning, Klee, and Montaigne?" represent maybe 2% of the population, and I'd bet $100 that if you asked them their politics you'd find that they're all liberals. good reading on this -- >https://www.richardhanania.com/p/liberals-read-conservatives-watch
>>25189508Didn't say it wasn't hypocritical.>>25189420Case in point.>>25189564Indeed. Problem is the former group still prefers to have a shelf that's 98% self improvement stuff and theology and 2% old potboiler anthologies and LOTR.The sole exception is the funky Mormon Fantasy cadre and people like Jerry Pournelle.Overall it's just not enough people to stage a takeover.
>>25189388It's nothttps://antelopehillpublishing.com/publish-me/
Right wingers cannot create art. This is not debatable. History bears it out.
They suppress right-wingers through various means. Matt Dinniman just had to apologize for being 1% unwoke. Leftists are extremely authoritarian and if your book has right-wing ideas it gets thrown out. If you are right-wing, you get thrown out. Most people don't want to brave that kind of hostile environment. That has shaped the landscape of both readers and writers. Leftists will play dumb about all of this (like everything) and go "erm the conservitoid brain can't handle the written word."
>>25189388Antelope HillImperium PressCountercurrentsPassage Press
>>25190135Any of these produce a readable novel?
>>25190172>did the chud meme publishers produce anything that wasnt slopRhetorical questions are gay.
>>25190172Passage Press for sure.
>>25190131so are you people chad hyperborean ubermenschen who drink the blood of your enemies or are you people pussies who squeal about heckin discrimination n sheit when random house rejects your turner diaries fanfic
>>25190172If you have to ask...
>>25190135>Translations, self help, history, comics and genre slop>Not a single litfic
>>25189388commie jew nepotism, unironically
>>25190172
>>25190177They seem to mostly publish classic books and some of their covers look like AI slop tbqh. American Paladin looks like it could be good.
>>25189388Because your compatriots think reading is for fags.
>>25189405This only works for women. Men are usually very distinct from each other.
Why don't you guys try writing a book instead of just crying about what you think publishing companies do? Get Peter Thiel to publish your book or something, there are thousands of tasteless right wing books being put out and pushed by truth social
>>25190131Very true in my experience. Leftists are extremely hostile. You don't even have to directly say anything that contradicts their beliefs, since you're dealing with mostly women you just have to give off the 'vibe' of being a normal person. They're constantly looking to victimize themselves
You can see why in this very thread. Lots of leftist anons who shit and piss themselves in anger at the very thought of a right winger being published.
>>25190375Peter Thiel is a homosexual zionist. Why would he publish a book that would harm him?
I support rightoids being published by large publishing houses. The more who get to read how utterly retarded and anti art they are the faster they will be shunned out of civilized countries.
>>25190400So your problem isn't that there isn't enough right wing publishers, its that there aren't any openly nazi ones
>>25190399Are you autistic? You seem to have a lot of trouble distinguishing between people being mad at you and people making fun of you
>>25190423If you think your thin veneer of sarcasm/mockery actually masks the seething anger and hatred beneath then you are sadly mistaken.
>>25190423You sound pretty mad, tbqh.
>>25190423>anon vociferated with shameful puerility
>>25190423Yeah your post right there doesn't sound like seething at all lmao
>>25190420There are plenty of libertarian, neocon and even christian "reactionary" publishers. There are no (non-religious) anti-Semitic ethnonationalist publications.
>>25190456*except those already mentioned in the thread, plus Armreg, Clemens & Blair and Black House
