>>25196439? last one isn’t at bump limit >>25192472
>>25196463that one isnt ladies erotic exclusive, bitch
Unwin’s dataset (86 societies and historical civilizations) shows, without exception up to 1934, that **minimal sexual opportunity** (the only proven driver of sustained high cultural energy) was achieved **only** by restricting women’s individual legal and social status. He states this directly:> “It is historically true to say that, in the past, social energy has been purchased at the price of individual freedom, for it has never been displayed unless the female of the species has sacrificed her rights as an individual and unless children have been treated as mere appendages to the estate of the male parent…”In every case where high energy appeared, it began under conditions where women had subordinated rights (patriarchal or semi-patriarchal structures enforcing chastity and absolute monogamy). Emancipation (full legal equality) then arose as a natural byproduct of that very success, but it **always** brought expanded sexual opportunity, triggering the three-generation decline. He found **no instance** of the reverse: equality granted while keeping opportunity at the absolute minimum.No other method (stronger taboos, religion, law, etc., independent of rights restriction) succeeded in the historical data. The only reliable lever that kept the “energy gate” closed was limiting women’s autonomy so the emancipatory pressure never fully opened it. Induction from consistent past behavior is the best predictor we have for future behavior in real life (exactly as every empirical science relies on). Therefore, if the overriding priority is **preventing the documented decline sequence**, the pragmatic, low-risk strategy is to maintain the system that historically worked: restrict the rights/emancipation that has always preceded the loosening. That system is what we call patriarchy (or at minimum, withholding full modern-style equality).Unwin himself noted the tension: absolute monogamy (the peak-energy condition) actually *required* legal equality between spouses, and he personally supported women having equal rights. He even said it would be “rash to conclude” that minimal opportunity *cannot* ever be achieved without restricting rights. But he offered that only as a theoretical hope—his data contained zero examples of it succeeding. For pure induction from evidence (not speculation), this conclusion holds: patriarchy, while never reaching the absolute highest peak energy, at least stabilized societies at a medium level without the collapse that followed every attempt at equality + monogamy.
>>25196576this is the most boring eroticism ever
>>25196497I hope you get the janny to ban these threads again
>>25196585that's because it's not dummkopf
Wymin = le badShrimple as dat.Prove me wrong
>>25196617Except me mum, tis true cuz I'm subjective with her and objective with the rest.
>>25196617Reminder all the greats came to this exact conclusion.
>>25196632But can you follow where it took them?
>>25196617Gay.
I despite the female so profoundly, you’d it’s chimerical
>>25196893Is this supposed to be haha-ESL? Regardless. GAYYYY
>>25196576the no nut chumps gotta fucking go
>>25197707i'm just spittin facts. fuck your feelings respectfully.
>>25197795holy kek what facts?
once i sat upon a hillthere upon i did jillbut my name was macgillso everyone said id just nancied.
>Al-Gharbi’s materialist analysis brilliantly explains when Awokenings occur (during periods of elite overproduction), why they occur (status competition among symbolic capitalists), and who participates in them (highly educated, relatively affluent professionals). He demonstrates that the contemporary Great Awokening was driven not by moral progress or technological change, but by the material conditions of elite oversupply following the 2008 financial crisis. This is an essential foundation for any serious critique of wokeism.Its starting to make sense that wokeness was caused by the 2008 economic crash, which started out as economic revolt with occupy wall street, which failed and transformed into an obsession with identity politics which created a reaction of the alt right which trump surfed to the white house
>>25198363so allegedly he took Putnam's theory to its logical conclusion. huh.
>>25198363I wonder if incels would exist if the economy remained stable in the late 2000s
>>25198372its from a substack i just read. its pretty good at explaining the theory that 2010s wokeness wasnt the first time it happened and also that it occurs because people who work in academia and media are retards who are scared to not have a jobhttps://1dimereview.substack.com/p/the-genealogy-of-wokeism-part-1
>>25198390Oh I write essays there too. I just wrote three the past two days.
>>25198363lol you fucking daft cunt being woke is the fucking oldest metaphor for enlightenment since there have been stories and writingyou dumb fucking idiot
ok.these are NOT sexy lady thoughtsget the fuck out my thread.
I play with my cervix while mounting the great stead of my Prince
>>25198479so youre into real estate play?weird but ok
whatever it would take to manifest in man the fire and courage to alter the tyrannical america of today died with people like John Brown. life has lost the austere brutality that can forge the heroically sane into sacrificing his or her self for the man beside him.what remains is the convulsions of people conquered before they were borntell me im wrong
>>25198522you're wrongthats not a man beside you
>>25198214my entire post. can you not read?
>>25198642that pseudo science shit about if men have people to cook and clean and wipe their asses they somehow find the time to do shit? id believe some fake science about pokemon before that lame energy shit>factsfuck you
>>25198691don't cry little retard. one day you too may learn to read.
>>25196439Since the history thread disappeared, is Oil, Power & War better than The Prize? Might pick up another book on the history of crude oil and its relation to power politics and compare both.
>>25198714dm me when you can science, no nut bro
THESE ARE NOT SEXY LADY POSTS
>>25198731learn to read first brainlet
should have said expository lady erotics V.1 thread
>>25198780ok "energy gate" bro
>>25198783good. knowing how to read will help you be less of a retard. i'm not your bro, foidlet.
>>25198795ok no nut energy gate bro
>>25198798>
>>25198804ok and this is you
>>25198691At least read a summary of a book before writing about it.
>>25199201at least take a nice whiff of the shit before stepping in itno thanks
>>25200374>
>>25200442holy christ im fit.
>>25198721Natural resources are always going to be where power and money gets involved. And the ability to be on the coastline. There aren't a lot of stories about landlocked empires.
>>25200454TOTALLY UNFUCKING NOT EROTIC, MY GIRL
