>Almost cultish in its development of a vehemently misogynistic ideology, this hydra-like incel subculture has spawned a detailed, often delusional and violently anti-feminist worldview>New recruits find the incel community in a variety of ways... Some are sucked in through more sinister means, groomed by messages in private gaming chat rooms... your first initiation is taking the "red pill".
Men do basically everything to maintain civilization. A society run by women would have Africa-tier standards of living.
If all the women reject me for no good reason despite taking care of my sick parents and getting a MsC and reading the classics then is it really my fault?
Is it worth reading the post-Larsson books? I read the trilogy twice
>The Extremism Nobody is Talking Aboutlol
>>25196478>live in matriarchal society>unperson any man that isnt a double alpha>demonize anyone who adresses this as incel>import infinity muslims at the same time because aubconsciously you crave subjugationThe nigger of genders
>>25196489>for no good reasonthat's the issue. if all women reject you, there IS a reason. you just refuse to self reflect.
>>25196478In my experience, its not incels that hate women the most, but guys that had lots of women around. Unchecked female nature is repulsive to anyone with decent morals, this includes good women too, as long they were raised properly. Deception and manipulation is how women evolved, and now they are mad that some people know it and write retarded bullshit books like that. I for one stopped to listen to women altogether unless they talk about baby-sitting or arts and crafts or drawing. Women can be fun to be around, there is just no point in listening to anything they have to say regarding any serious topic. And thats okay.
>>25196483> citing a book written by a nobody with zero qualificationsgo back to /pol/, retard
>>25196529>but guys that had lots of women aroundI didn’t mind women either until my first girlfriend, each subsequent partner bringing for a slowly growing hatred. Another cope that they and their defenders use is the “incel” one. Incels barely know what women are like since they still have these idealised views of them. Whereas living with one gives you the experience to know they’re just retards; flesh and bone just like men but more disgusting and naturally smelly than men, psychologically like children but lacking the innocence thereof, given how bitter and fickle they are.
>>25196478Unwin’s dataset (86 societies and historical civilizations) shows, without exception up to 1934, that **minimal sexual opportunity** (the only proven driver of sustained high cultural energy) was achieved **only** by restricting women’s individual legal and social status. He states this directly:> “It is historically true to say that, in the past, social energy has been purchased at the price of individual freedom, for it has never been displayed unless the female of the species has sacrificed her rights as an individual and unless children have been treated as mere appendages to the estate of the male parent…”In every case where high energy appeared, it began under conditions where women had subordinated rights (patriarchal or semi-patriarchal structures enforcing chastity and absolute monogamy). Emancipation (full legal equality) then arose as a natural byproduct of that very success, but it **always** brought expanded sexual opportunity, triggering the three-generation decline. He found **no instance** of the reverse: equality granted while keeping opportunity at the absolute minimum.No other method (stronger taboos, religion, law, etc., independent of rights restriction) succeeded in the historical data. The only reliable lever that kept the “energy gate” closed was limiting women’s autonomy so the emancipatory pressure never fully opened it. Induction from consistent past behavior is the best predictor we have for future behavior in real life (exactly as every empirical science relies on). Therefore, if the overriding priority is **preventing the documented decline sequence**, the pragmatic, low-risk strategy is to maintain the system that historically worked: restrict the rights/emancipation that has always preceded the loosening. That system is what we call patriarchy (or at minimum, withholding full modern-style equality).Unwin himself noted the tension: absolute monogamy (the peak-energy condition) actually *required* legal equality between spouses, and he personally supported women having equal rights. He even said it would be “rash to conclude” that minimal opportunity *cannot* ever be achieved without restricting rights. But he offered that only as a theoretical hope—his data contained zero examples of it succeeding. For pure induction from evidence (not speculation), this conclusion holds: patriarchy, while never reaching the absolute highest peak energy, at least stabilized societies at a medium level without the collapse that followed every attempt at equality + monogamy.
>>25196483You can see this happen in reality survival shows if they're divided by gender.Universally, the women form cliques and devolve into infighting and nothing gets done.The men immediately assign tasks to everyone and anyone not carrying his weight is ostracized. Both genders create ingroups and outgroups, but men form them based on the perceived capability of the members while women's criteria are far too nebulous for me to understand.
>>25196535dilate
>>25196478I prefer the original cover
>>25196626Cope
>>25196509>guy who takes care of his grandma needs to self-reflectI shiggy diggy
>>25196478finally, a book about me
>>25196535>UMMMM DO YOU HAVE A DEGREE IN THAT FIELD????kill yourself you retarded fucking faggot
>>25196666El mucho checko
>>25196540Same. I was a male feminist when I was a virgin. A few gf's later, I realized that everything my dad tried to tell me about women was 100% right. They're basically giant retarded children and shouldn't be allowed to vote.
>>25196495They want to be the underdog so bad.
>>25196664>man does one good thing>is therefore absolved of all negative behavioursholy shit. is this what you tell yourself?
>>25196695>he must have bad behaviors if he's an incelshe must have been doing something to deserve it if she got raped
>>25196702everyone has bad behaviours, you fucking idiot
>>25196483/threadMen pay roughly 75% of all income tax, but only take about 40% of government handouts. Men also account for 99% of all infrastructure and critical resource jobs, so civilization would collapse without them. Over 90% of all patents are held by men (approaching 100% in some industries), so there would basically be zero innovation in a woman-only society.I don't think women are useless, but it's clear which gender are the producers and which are the beneficiaries.
>>25196716Every rape victim did something to deserve it.
>>25196478It’s funny that man hating feminism is something we just have to live with and even implying “kill all men” is inappropriate for schools and workplaces paints a target on you, not them. Meanwhile even stating you’re sick of nagging women or you won’t read a woman author is cause for terrorism interventions. This just proves a central incel thesis of a feminized society right.
>>25196478Laura Bates hates men who hate women. I hate women who hate men too -- though there aren't any truthfully -- only love-hate. That means there aren't men who hate women either -- only-love hate.
>>25196478>Laura Batesill give her something to 'bate if you understand the words i am implying
>>25196754>incel thesiswhy do you faggots bring incels into everything. do you check under your bed for incels before going to sleep too?
>>25196666Quadbike!
>>25196478Women wanted autonomy. They got it. Good job. The problem that plagues academia from economics to humanities is the assumption that the norm for humans are to be rational agents capable of adapting on the fly and pursuing truth over everything else. That is incorrect.
>>25196478A funny thing about all the moral panic about "misogyny" and the manosphere is that all of these were solved problemsChivalry used to be a thing, men used to protect and care for womenBut then women rioted against it and upset the order, now they don't have anything to replace it with
>>25196478HEIL HYRDA
>>25196808I chuckled
>>25196891cut off one head, two grow in its place brother inshallah
>>25196883Its time for rape culture to actually exist for real this time
>>25196808They think that if you’ve had an intimate relationship with a woman you’re meant to suddenly love them, becoming a simp and hating anyone that dare say something bad about them, deeming them as incels. When it’s more likely that actually being in a relationship will lead to your resentment of them, which in my experience has proven to be correct.They need incels to be the only people who hate women because to them it justifies their own hatred and gives them reason to act superior.
>>25197031>women: I'M MORE THAN A SERIES OF HOLES>also women: *uses access to their holes as the sole standard by which to measure a person*this song goes very hard
>>25196540Well I actually was always like that even before I lost my v card. Growing up with a younger sister who resents you for being an undersocialized autist does that to you.
>>25196483Aaron Clarey is based
Plagiarized title.
>>25197053Wasn't that the original title of the The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo book?
>>25196550Well said Equality is the greatest lie that kills societies
>>25196478>Men Who Hate WomenWhoa, how did you get a hold of my diary desu
>>25196535He has qualifications retard and he literally sites the government bureau of labor statistics
Sure do love a /lit/ thread where no one discusses the book and instead sucks off themselves and each other for literally judging a book by its cover, it's great, isn't it awesome?
>>25196478Another paranoid, neurotic feminist cunt. Nothing to see here.She also wrote "Everyday Sexism," which I always move to the Fantasy section whenever I'm in a bookshop.
>>25196550I'd like to know which examples of civilizations he used
>>25196478i need to find a pamphlet or a speech against this law that predicts our current world where every man is either terrified that his skank will kidnap his kids and turn them into faggots and whores and troons to spite him, or is paying all his take home pay in child support so his skank and turn his baby into a faggot or whore or troon
>>25196550>Unwin himself noted the tension: absolute monogamy (the peak-energy condition) actually *required* legal equality between spouses, and he personally supported women having equal rightsmen and women have equal rights under justinians code. if they cant live together, adultery is still a serious crime, and they can go live at monasteries. however, due to the nature of females of every species on the planet, it is not possible to ever give the birthing skank custody of the child. the child must either go with the father, the fathers family, a male of the mothers family, or an orphanage, but can never be left in the care of the mother
>>25196798>there aren't men who hate women20For they speak against thee wickedly, and thine enemies take thy name in vain.21Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee?22I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.23Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thoughts:24And see if there be any wicked way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting.otoh, God says He isnt even going to punish these whores in Hos 4
>>25196633jej>>25196478does it go into how a large portion of incels came out of the big feminist push of the early 2010's? I feel like thats when it tranformed from an ultra niche society to a moderate and decently known one.
>>25197193Thanks for the idea
>>25196478Wasn't this the original title of Girl with the Dragon Tattoo?
>>25196656Rope
>>25196478>ask classmates what they're researching>male classmates are all researching fascinating, unique, or at least ambitious things>woman: "Misogyny in Rome">woman: "Misogyny and Hamlet">woman: "The intersection of misogyny and periods in Hamlet">woman: "Women">woman: "Opinions about women having sex in Weimar newspapers">woman: "Women in the work of Robert Musil">woman: "Vagina">woman: "I have a vagina">woman: "I'm a woman btw. Vagina here">woman: "Sex and periods in gender">woman: "Woman perceptions of woman, ,vagina, cooters breasts woman period I'm on my period clitorises in the work of the band Oingo Boingo and Hamlet's Perception of Clitoris Vagina Gender Studies">woman: "Queering Gender in Medieval Manuscripts: Your period or MY period?">woman: "Misogyny, Periods, and You: Ernst Cassirer on Substance, Function, and My Gay Love Affair with Gender Studies">woman: "Women in 'Woman's Work': Gendering Gender in the Social Sciences">woman: "Prostitution and Gender in Antebellum Calcutta">woman: "Gender">woman: "Sex and gender studies">woman: "Tampons, pads, and ironclads: Stonewall Jackson and Freebleeding">woman: "Einstein contra Bergson: Who rapes me more by having existed?"
>>25196719
>>25197361It’s disgusting how little cognisance they possess.
>>25197361it do be like that
>>25196540I have never needed to manage or oversee my guy friends. I have had to manage and oversee every single woman that has ever been in my life and the consequences for failing to do so were severe. Women are a constant sparring match.
>>25197361>"Tampons, pads, and ironclads: Stonewall Jackson and Freebleeding"This one got me
>>25196808Try reading the OP and comment chain next time immigrant.
I honestly don't even believe there is an incel subculture.Wherever men are allowed to gather and talk freely, they will just kind of come to the conclusion that women are lacking in certain regards, and that society is screwing them over, because those things are true.If you want to fight the resentment, either improve women or segregate them from certain roles, and make society more genuinely fair for men. This shouldn't be a crazy hard thing to figure out.
>>25197296nahshe briefly mentioned how it started with a woman calling herself and her small community invcel (involuntary celibate) in the 90sthen quickly made the connection of young lonely men being indocrinated with incel ideology through the manosphere, you know the drilli dropped it after chapter 1 so maybe she mentioned that later, but from the tone of her writing, very unlikely
>>25198590>young lonely men being indocrinated with incel ideology through the manosphereThis part here: this doesn't happen.All these people can ever do is put the cart before the horse. It's maddening.
It's really telling that right now with the current state of things women's biggest concern is not the economy, war or the rising crime but being able to murder their own babiesGiving these creatures political power is a civilizational suicide
>>25198733Being able to murder their own babies *and* making sure autistic men on the internet receive the correct level of state-sanctioned bullying and buck-breaking.
>>25198740ancientpilled and frankly based.i always thought women were more in touch with the primal. my theory is because they’ve got to deal with literally bleeding for a week every month (also the bodily horror of childbirth), which is a disgusting and animal thing that doesn’t fit into a civilised world at all, and as a result they see clearer in a lot of ways.
>>25198755>which is a disgusting and animal thing that doesn’t fit into a civilised world at allretard take. you need people to be born to have a civilzation. foid hands typed this.
>>25198596i think it happensbut its a small number of people that tend to have low iqother low iq people see this and think every incel is like that too
>>25197361This is on purpose.
>>25198786these didnt happen
>>25198766are you up syndrome? i’m not anti-children being born. i’m saying the physical act of pushing a baby out of your body stands in stark contrast to jarring contrast to the sanitised, abstracted world modern civilisation tries to construct around itself.
>>25197361Indeed. Women should not be educated beyond the age of 7. They are fit only to be housewives. Studies prove this. We need an end to degeneracy.
>>25198797What does this ability to see more clearly allow them to do? Make a "refugees welcome" sign during their lunch break at their HR job?
>>25198803i suppose making an enemy with someone like you would be one thing.
>>25198805>Effeminate, passive-aggressive responseHole detected.
>>25198797>i’m saying the physical act of pushing a baby out of your body stands in stark contrast to jarring contrast to the sanitised, abstracted world modern civilisation tries to construct around itself.it's literally the foundation of civilzation foid. no birthing process = no one being born.
>>25198811yep i’m a big 6’1 trans women and tb h it’s cool that you’re an ally.
>>25198817Are trannies also "more in touch with the primal"? Cutting your genitals off and ripping open a wound between your legs that you have to keep dilated so that it won't heal also seems like "a disgusting and animal thing that doesn’t fit into a civilised world at all".
>>25197361goes without saying i didn’t bother reading the whole thing but line 2 reminded me of a good kingsley amis poem ‘a bookshop idyll’Between the Gardening and the CookeryComes the brief Poetry shelf;By the Nonesuch Donne, a thin anthologyOffers itself.Like all strangers, they divide by sex:Landscape Near ParmaInterests a man, so does The Double Vortex,So does Rilke and Buddha.“I travel, you see”, “I think” and “I can read"These titles seem to say;But I Remember You, Love is my Creed,Poem for J.,The ladies’ choice, discountenance my patterFor several seconds;From somewhere in this (as in any) matterA moral beckons.Should poets bicycle-pump the human heartOr squash it flat?Man’s love is of man’s life a thing apart;Girls aren’t like that.We men have got love well weighed up; our stuffCan get by without it.Women don’t seem to think that’s good enough;They write about it.And the awful way their poems lay them openJust doesn’t strike them.Women are really much nicer than men:No wonder we like them.
>>25198820don’t know if animals have sex change surgeries, you tell me.
>>25198829So if it's just a disgusting thing then it's not enough to give them mystical insight? If they threw shit at each other instead could they gain this power?
>>25198830is surgery even considered disgusting it’s a modern man infection after all
>>25198834invention
>>25198834People have been slicing up each others' genitals for thousands of years, haven't they?
>>25198841thousands of years is just yesterday as far as humanity is concerned
>>25198842So genital mutilation from 4,000 years ago counts as a "modern" invention, got it.
>>25198846considering i’m talking about primitivism, yes .. the birth of civilisation was almost 6000 years ago.
just ordered a 10k pack of colored sticky-notes, accompanying labels, and a 40 pack of highlighters. we are getting intellectual tonight ladies.
>>25196478Only misogynists are able to truly love women. It's the women who made themselves unlovable. It's that simple.
>>25196478Laura bates is mentally ill. What do you hope to gain by arguing with her?
>>25198814>no birthing process = no one being bornFor now. That's about to change. Birthing will be outsourced to plastic bags.
>>25198841>>25198846
>>25198917this surely won't lead to man made horrors beyond comprehension
>>25198922
>>25198929
>>25198929W T F
>>25197113i remember reading this ages ago, it's garbage from someone who built an entire career of grifting schools with "muh patriarchy" talks. there's nothing here beyond saying that boys might have been raped but they call women cunts which is worse
>>25196483>Men do basically anythingLabor wise? Sure. But you could make the same argument for livestock.
>>25197111>has qualifications>Bachelor's of Science in Financeconsider suicide.
>>25197111Surely the author does not make the assumption that if all men dissapeared over night women wouldn't take up those male dominated jobs...?
>>25199000just looked to guy up, here he is in his captain america t shirt
>>25196483I also recommend Zero World Problems and The Menu from him
>>25199000NTA, but that is still technically a qualification. It might not be wholly relevant to to the book he wrote (I don't know how finance heavy the perspective of the book is) nor is it a particularly sophisticated field of study. However, during completion of any undergraduate degree, students are required to write essays in which they must form arguments and cite sources. An undergraduate degree is just proof that you can take in information, read, write academically, follow instructions and criteria, formulate arguments, and engage with scholarship on a given subject. I have a Dual BA in Ancient History and Philosophy am currently working on a masters, and I'm sure there are thousands of autodidacts who have never set foot in a University who have written well researched, well argued, and high quality work at a level greater than myself and my peers. On the inverse, there are literally hundreds of thousands of articles, dissertations, theses, and books by PHDs that are of absolutely abysmal scholarship. Sure, as a rule a qualification is useful, and it can be a good indication of ability to present a logical thesis, but constant appeals to authority and disregarding work solely on that basis is retarded, especially when you haven't read the book, and when your reason for disregarding it is because you concluded on the face of it that it opposes your personal worldview or politics.
>>25199039>Gen X'er wears cheap Supermarket Dad t-shirts to the gymWow, how revealing. I'm sure he's an absolute idiot and completely unserious because he wore that t-shirt and took a picture while wearing it
>>25196478the elephant in the room is that your average moderate Muslim has opinions that would take an incel about 10 years to make.
>>25199095another pic
>>25196624this>>25197050>jew>based[x] Doubt
>>25197361Marry the Ersnt Cassirer reader, she has good taste.
>>25199131Okay maybe this looks twattish, but! We've all taken silly pictures, maybe he's doing it ironically rather than:>I look like a heckin badass Mafia Boss with my cigar, fuck you!
>>25199157it’s kind of his MO, check his ig (yes)
>>25196535>>25199000>>25199039I like how you are making personal attacks without addressing any of his points
>>25199179Oh dear. Well, I'm sure his work could still be interesting and well-written. I'm not going to read it, but I feel a desire to defend him for some reason.
>>25199197i have no dog in this race i’m an innocent bystander who was staggered by how lame and cringe your man is.
>>25199204not sure what to say to that
>>25199209It just gets cornier and cornier. Unfortunate, he is the epitome of the Gen-X "redpilled" type, the poster child for the long forgotten 'MGTOW' movement. The societal critiques of these types were not unfounded, and their complaints were reasonable, but the resignation of it all was pathetic. The aesthetics of such men are also incredibly tasteless and unsophisticated, very lower middle class Dad esque. The kind of men who's ultimate aspirations are wearing a suit and an expensive watch, driving a Porsche with a brainless bimbo in a Red dress in the passenger seat; entering restaurant for the Maître d to wordlessly usher them to a designated table on sight alone.
>>25199087so you're saying one should trust a book on economics just because it was authored by someone with a degree (any degree)? that's stupid, economy is a field of science (social science, if you're so inclined), it can only be taken from someone proven to be competent in the field, will you for example take a book on medicine seriously if it was written by a highschool dropout? I agree that academic education is not absolutely necessary to formulate a good thesis, but it's the best heuristic we have, most of our knowledge is built on the basis of epistemological trust, that is, we cannot possibly verify it all by ourselves (expect if you're proposing that the average person should be an expert in all fields of science and have infinite amount of time), and an argument written by some uneducated person is guilty until proven, by a person qualified to give a proper critique, innocent. it's therefore only axiomatic for the lay person to, at best, take this book with a massive grain of salt, if not ignore it altogether.
>>25196478>Book from 2020Probably woefully outdated by now, being an internet sub-culture and all.I wonder how deep she goes, though. Like is she going to mewntion that incels in China basically worship a guy who kidnapped a woman and kept her naked inside a barn for ten years or she going to do surface level outsider coverage and not even entertain their worldview or mention that most incels are actually brown?
>>25199222whatever a man says, no matter how objective he’s being, can never be fully separated from the kind of person he is. it’d pay to remember that.
>>25196478>New recruits find the incel community in a variety of ways...Not really. The main way is through women's behavior. >Almost cultish in its development of a vehemently misogynistic ideology, this hydra-like incel subculture has spawned a detailed, often delusional and violently anti-feminist worldviewMost *people* hate feminists, and feminism is by definition a cult
>>25199225>so you're saying one should trust a book on economics just because it was authored by someone with a degree (any degree)?No. That's not what I am saying. If you read on you will see that I propose that both the highly educated and the autodidact alike are both capable of both good and bad work respectively. That an appeal to qualifications is ultimately (in regards to the quality of a given book) a meaningless metric, only reading the work and assessing it will you be able to conclude whether it is logically coherent, well researched, well written etc. However, I am positing that a degree in any subject (within reason) can indicate at the bare minimum an ability to engage with scholarship and write academically to at least some degree to successfully pass the degree and graduate. The anon to which I replied was implying that it was not "a qualification" or that it indicated nothing relevant whatsoever, and did not meet the criteria for the type of qualification authority to which he was appealing.
>>25196483is this the author doing self-promo? every time this image has been posted it was the same person (filename) https://warosu.org/lit/image/6rM4BFcEetuINH4FIT35AQ
>>25199243That Maxim is genderless though.
>>25199276naturally
>>25199248>I am positing that a degree in any subject (within reason) can indicate at the bare minimum an ability to engage with scholarship and write academically to at least some degree to successfully pass the degree and graduate.Buddy so what's the deal, you've just ignored the state of the academy for about 30 years or are you posting funny jokes here?
>>25199248did you even read my post?>only reading the work and assessing it will you be able to conclude whether it is logically coherent, well researched, well written etc.again, you'd be extremely foolish to take this particular book, given the qualifications of its author, with more than a modicum of consideration. simply because you are (assuming no education in economics) in no position to have an educated opinion on it.>a degree indicates an ability to write academicallyyet>the highly educated is capable of bad workso you're both saying a degree is an indication of scholar capability and also is not?>did not meet the criteria for the type of qualification authority to which he was appealing.yes, it didn't. Unless you are capable of assessing his argument. it's simply common sense for the layman to distrust the said argument made by someone with no education in the field in which he is claiming knowledge.
>>25199129What is that supposed to mean?
>>25199222What is the alternative? There is no reason to contribute to the system anymore so just enjoy the decline
>>25199312
>>25196478This bitch is retarded.Incels love women. Their entire identity is based on the lie that having a woman around would fix any of their issues and not just create more issues. Every incel is one fat chick blowjob away from being a simp.In order to properly hate women you must experience them.
>>25199179Utah is so pretty
>>25199268Kek
>>25196478If you don't bow before the gynocentric Matriarchal society we are forcing on you then that means you are misogynist.
>>25199298>it's simply common sense for the layman to distrust the said argument made by someone with no education in the field in which he is claiming knowledge.Nta but thats the fault of the layman and why he is typically a retard.
it's fucked but there's nothing (You) could do to fix it, it must run its courseu can take advantage of the situation and enjoy the positive aspects of the decline or opt out, either is fine desu
>>25199343do you expect the layman to be omniscient?
>>25196478I thought this was a novel or something. Are there 2 books with this title? I've seen this on the nightstands of a lot of my friends that happen to be left wingers. (or the other one with the same title) Some of them have girlfriends so it might be their girlfriend reading it.>>25196489Lololol you want women to care that you read classic novels? Anon they only care if you are a teacher or an intellectual aka a in a respected societal position. Maybe next time when I hit the bars with my bros I will make sure to say extra loud so everyone can hear that I saw half the movies on the British Film Institute list of greatest films of all time. This way I will signal to all the women attending that I have a very high IQ and I am very cultured. >>25196529This has always been the most obvious thing in the world to me. It baffles me this doesn't get mentioned more often lol >>25196633Hehe xD
>>25197361>woman: "Tampons, pads, and ironclads: Stonewall Jackson and Freebleeding"Pure comedy gold anon.
>>25196807Laura Bates is just crying out for corrective rape. And as long as its by a six foot plus, six inch plus, six figure plus chad? It won't be "rape", it will be a wild night of fun. God's fucking truth.
>>25197030>Its time for rape culture to actually exist for real this timekeep importing shitskins, you'll see it.
>>25196529not sure that holds. seems more likely that when people are kept at a distance they stop appearing as people at all and turn into something half-invented. robert graves said if you separate boys from girls what you get is homosexuality (and not liking girls enough probably has a hand in a lot of homosexuality). any kind of prejudice comes from distance. one poet - i forget who - said hatred comes from a kind of inner decay.>>25199378>BFI top 250are you aware what currently holds the number 1 spot?
post the post revolution gt
>>25198814I had a female RAT that birthed out 14 healthy babies. Its not that big an accomplishment.
>>25199289If I didn't do those things at University I wouldn't have graduated, or at the very least wouldn't have got good marks. Yes Academics are in major decline, and yes there are many ridiculous degrees on offer, and yes the institutions are Marxist circlejerks, but at in my experience (top 5 Russell Group uni) you still are required to do do all which I listed.
>>25199222>for the long forgotten 'MGTOW' movementforgotten? No. It just got incorporated into all rational men's philosophy and went underground/understood.
>>25199309>What is that supposed to mean?it means that the (supposed) "cancer' that a so called incel thinks? Is one tenth as bad as what your average muslim thinks. and women vote for open borders every time. Women vote to get themselves out of the frying pan and into the fire.
>>25196478>>New recruits find the incel community in a variety of wayssuch as being exposed to real life in a western society.
>>25199499incels - known for touching grass
>>25199129do you think about muslim men often enough as to summon them in a post they have absolutely nothing to do with? massive faggotry indicator desu.
>>25196478A girl I used to mess around with told me too much feminine energy is bad.
>>25199516Does your mom's pubes count?
>>25199480I was part of that.>>25199490What compels them to do this? The female mind is an enigma.
>>25199432At this point I don't even. They have made their beds.
>>25199576would hope not *attaches scrunched-face.gif*
>>25199338Thats because they have probably the third or fourth least amount of blacks per capita behind North Dakota, South Dakota and Montana.
>>25199232>mention that most incels are actually brownI noticed this. A lot. Now I'm guilty as charged with being on their forums denoting the fact a woman hasn't touched me for ten years and I seem to attract whores. But I'm probably the only guy there with a majority WASP background.
>>25199577>What compels them to do this?Suicidal empathy
>>25199601Thats really fucking gay. I guess emotional intelligence is a myth.
>>25199435That's the general poll where all the critics get to vote i.e left wing academics, television programmers and feminists lol The only list people care about is the directors one. And FYI in 2012 the N1 film on both polls iirc was Tokyo Story then Citizen kane and I believe 8 1/2 is also a top 5 or at least top 10 movie. My biggest qualm with the last 2 once a decade lists was Vertigo being voted so high. Who the fuck thinks it is ok to put a Alfred Hitchcock Hollywood Film at the top spot rofl and lmao Anyways, I meant I watched a lot of classic movies and some of them happen to be in the what used to be the most acclaimed movie poll of all time until 2022 when they went full retard with the women's movies x)
>>25199629>emotional intelligence is a mythIt is, it was just made up like other kinds of intelligence to make stupid people feel special
>>25199595That's mostly because white incels tend to keep it to themselves either because they fear social ostracization (usually alt-right) or because they internalised the ''bluepilled'' way of thinking (usually classical conservatives, moderate rw and tradcaths). They will only dare to speak up in their own private groups where they are not drowned by waves of brown people or judged by others
>>25199637fellini’s earlier work is much much better. white sheik is top draw fellini. >The only list people care about is the directors onewhere the same feminist film takes the #3 spot.
>>25199745Nothing about your comment is genuine. Anyways, as to why Jeanne Dielman makes the 3rd spot in the director's poll. If you use your brain you would easily come to the conclusion that people obviously try to bump specific movies to the top spot. If everyone voted for their actual favorite Ozu film Tokyo Story wouldn't have made the top spot, obviously. This is also why there is only 1 other Chantal Akerman film in the entire list. You can go ahead and look up EXACTLY who voted for which movie I guarantee you the people who voted for In the Mood for Love are all talentless hacks who got an invitation to vote and made a coordinated effort to get it in a top 10 spot.And I highly doubt you have seen a single Fellini movie which is your loss I suppose.
>>25196478>Nobody is talking about>Every TV show, blog and bookstore is full of it.
no way that's a feminist's name
>>25199790it was just a funny aside i wasn’t expecting the bait to be swallowed whole. & not sure why you feel the need to doubt my film cred considering i knew the list and had the wherewithal to call it ‘BFI’ and not ‘british film institute’ which i’ve never seen anyone (not even yanks) do. as another aside if you’ve been into cinema longer than 2022 you should be over that list by now. i think welles said white sheik was his fav fellini too.
Cinema is so fucking gay and trite.
>>25199957did you post this in the wrong thread?
>>25199963Nope
>>25199957It's actually the peak mode of storytelling.
>>25199977threads about feminist literature
>>25199867Sure bro you hide behind trolling and baiting whatever you say Mr. know nothing about the cinema. And as a matter of fact Federico Fellini happens to be my favorite director and I do love The White Sheik but saying: "Federico Fellini's earlier works are much much better" yeah ok what Youtube video essay or Reddit comment did you get that from? I bet you don't even know what a Dino Risi film is. Anyways, that is all, you can go watch Stalker now with your boyfriend or something.
Maybe the women should ask why they are hated.
>>25199996quite telling your first instinct was reddit or yt essay videos. i vitelloni & white sheik are F’s best.>I bet you don't even know what a Dino Risi filmthat’s a really embarrassing thing to come out with.>Mr. know nothing about the cinemaare you down syndrome?one italian director who’s received something less than his due: castellani.i don’t rate tarkovsky.
>>25200010I might watch Countersex and Ghosts, Italian style. Anyways, I can tell you are either very young or not right in the head. I will be off to watch C'eravamo Tanto Amati, easily one of the best Italian movies ever made.
>>25199988You been following it?
>>25200069>Anyways
>>25200004Good point but good luck on that.
>>25199730I must be a solitary exception then because i let people know very quickly. Though I think my age plays a factor, I'm turning 44 in June and by then you become too old to care anymore. Its like when your grandfather soils his Depends at the dinner table during Thanksgiving.
>>25197361The worst part is that every class has topics specifically for women
>>25196483This. If men are hating women, it’s for good reason and ultimately good. Women are retards and absolutely being elevated at the cost of men and killing, imprisoning and impoverishing large swathes of men. Not to mention the psychological torture in schools/society and trying to convince men to neuter themselves. Women aren’t hated enough.
>>25198755Didn't know Robert Graves was pro-rape. Absolutely based.
>>25199070And Enjoy the Decline. It's about how to abuse the welfare system.
>>25200294https://www.bitchute.com/video/kAfn6c2DxNSA/
>>25200726Whatever happened to him? I remember him being somewhat of a progressive libertarian back in the YouTube MGTOW era. He debated that one Distributist guy who ended up becoming a Moldbug advocate.
>>25196478Woah… she’s talking about me!!!
>>25196478>A lot of men are being exposed to misogynistic propagandaHahahahahahahaha. Men dont hate women because of "propaganda." Men hate women because we deal with them every single day. Women are our mothers, our teachers, our fellow students, our coworkers, our managers and HR reps, our entertainers, our policy makers, and no matter what their role in our life is women have positioned themselves as our enemy. From the cradle to the grave women belittle and villify us until our basic sexual urges are culturally considered evil, and just looking at a woman can ruin our lives forever. Men hate women because we've been dealing with you crazy, lazy, stupid fuckwits for decades, watching you screw up not only our jobs and our lives, but the very fabric of civilization.
>>25200299well humans generally mated in nature (like all animals)
>>25200726It’s insane this video is 7 years old. I’m just learning what this guy has been saying for nearly a decade since the last year, by being exposed to the science and data that just keeps coming out supporting these facts. Women simply cannot vote or hold power. If you have to go before a female judge, may god bless your soul.
>>25200726Based TFM poster>>25200775He still streams on alternative platforms like Rumble and Bitchute since he got kicked off YouTube, he is a shill for Russia and China now and he got redpilled on the JQ since the October attacks, one of his co-hosts is a jew who is a huge Zionist shill. He doesn't do debates anymore but I remember he did one with Destiny which was a complete shitshow. He recently got unbanned from Twitter so you can follow him there. He's also a friend with Aaron Clarey and reviewed and promoted multiple of his books.>>25200999I remember when people with that opinion were just a fringe minority but now more and more men are realizing that women should not have political power.
>>25201049Link for Destiny debatehttps://www.youtube.com/live/64ueMHqE4NU?is=NLRosBwGRzw498Gs
>>25200999Trips, but ive known about him for nearly fifteen years. I was around when Bernard Chapin was still making content and that was like 2008. The whole anti-feminist thing hadn't really taken off yet and I always felt back then i found few people I could relate to over it. It was strange new territory back then. Now its everywhere.
>>25201049>shill for ChinaThat's horrific. Never understood what pushes people in that direction. Russians i can understand but the Chinese aren't even white.
>>25201049I can never get anyone to promote my shit and sales have dried up. Everyone complains that so-called "incels" don't write but when one actually does its nothing but crickets. I don't get it.
>>25201056He thinks BRICS is fighting against globohomo, his knowledge of geopolitics is pretty limited
>>25201087Ridiculous assumption considering Brazil is part of it. As someone who was a content creator awhile back I usually backed my men's rights stuff with legitimate political philosophy. Many in his line of work tend to be one note singers. But I don't really do videos as much anymore. Too busy writing substack articles.
>>25201087>>25201107BRICS is completely made up it's really just China
>>25201122China doesn't have military and natural resources so it's more like Russia and China
>>25201107Most other people in the manosphere fall into nihilism or hedonism so he at least tries to have some philosophy even though it's just bastardized version of daoism.
>>25196489>and reading the classicslol, just lol
