[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: EliteReaders.jpg (711 KB, 1125x1940)
711 KB
711 KB JPG
Never forget
>>
File: lmao.png (171 KB, 701x375)
171 KB
171 KB PNG
all you have to do to be considered élite nowadays is not to waste your time reading ya slop
>>
I am a leftist
The problem is the feminised education system, not the left
>>
the answer is it's cus i showed up.
>>
>>25197440
Maybe pre-hack /lit/ had some readers but the catalog right now has almost no threads about literature. This place went form "start with the Greeks" to "book-tok is cringe."
>>
>>25200552
Tourists who overstayed their welcome. (Not that they ever were)
>>
>>25200552
ya the weird attempt to get old /lit/ classics like gr or bm categorized as "reddit" is def a toxic psyop cuz if gr is reddit now, i guess that means game of thrones fantasy slop is /lit/? hell mfing no, gtfo
>>
>>25200595
fr fr no cap
>>
>Internet columnist
>Female
Who ever reads this shit let alone pays for it to be written?
>>
>elite reader
I can't believe how high off your own farts you need to be to conjure up that phrase
>>
>>25197541
>implying the one didn't spring from the other
>>
>>25200595
>/lit/ attracts the illiterate
A tale as old as time.
>>
for me it's goodreads whenever I want an interpretation that transcends time
>>
feels like /lit/ has already gone downhill even since this article came out
>>
>>25197440
I'm assuming by "left", they mean "liberal". If that's the case, there are probably more leftists here, then in their company.
>>
>>25202098
>there are probably more leftists here, then
>then
indeed ideological puppet retard
>>
>>25202098
>I'm assuming by "left", they mean "liberal"
They don't. The New Statesman is a British publication. They actually know what words mean.
>>
>>25202105
Fuck
>>
>>25200595
I agree that’s it’s stupid; we live in a world in which young people are so irony poisoned that they liken a postmodern book from 50 years ago to the mannerisms of a website’s community as an insult and that means they’re not allowed to like it, to speak nothing of its quality. The same goes for blood meridian and its increased popularity among younger people who may or may not have read it because it’s also popular on reddit and someone popular on YouTube made a long video on it. Pretty shallow stuff.
Why do you have to type like that though? It’s fucking gay.
>>
>>25202129
then they should bloody well know that /lit/ is anything but "elite"
>>
>>25197440
>esoteric kantianism

Do not cite the Deep Magic to me, Witch. I was there when it was written
>>
>>25197529
>hey meta, can i get a nude tayne? nEWd. tAYne.
>>
>>25202132
It has its share of retards, but also some advanced readers. All human life is here.
It's also snobbish as fuck, which is a prominent characteristic of the elite.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.