Shouldn't "Remove" mean to switch something around, and "Demove" to be extract, destroy, take-out something?
shouldn't a king's subjects really be his objects?
>>25201207remove means to move again. you moved it there, you move it away
Unmove
Moven’tNah, that would mean never moving in the first place.Antimove?
>shivering, his legs submoved under the cover
>>25201210Aren't they subjected to his rule?
Remove just mean moving again. Demove, unmove, and antimove all imply a movement back to a previous state.
how van flammable and inflammable mean the same thing
>>25202814So how do you remove a tooth from someone's mouth that naturally grew there?
>>25201207remove is when you move something again
>>25202821violence. if it doesn't work use more
Nothing can be created or destroyed. Only moved. From dream reality into reality and back. Into presence our out of presence. In the past. Out of mind. Forgotten. Lost. Forsaken. Damned.
>>25201207>be extract, destroy, take-out something?REPLACE YOU FUCKING RETARD
>>25202991Not necessarily. That's be closer to Remove.
>>25201207Shouldn't "spleeb" mean to switch something around, as in, "I spleebed your words around," and "splorg" to be extract, destroy, take-out something, as in, "I splorged your mum's gooch last night?"
>>25201207you are ignoring the full sweep of the re prefix, thats all.>>25202809based etymologist
>>25201207that's exactly how remove is used. demove would be like removing a vhs tape and instantly destroying it
Notice: this thread is too high IQ and will be closed soon due to the subhumans on this website
>>25205153lol skibidi
>>25201207In the same vein, why is mv used for both moving and renaming?
