[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Norton.jpg (826 KB, 1604x2560)
826 KB
826 KB JPG
Reading this makes me depressed knowing that formalist poetry is no longer a widely practiced art in literary circles. Could it ever make a comeback, or is it incompatible with a hedonistic culture in which even elites rarely get a good classical education?
>>
>plotfags an anthology
>>
>>25205171
Formalist poetry is the most aristocratic art next to classical music.
>>
Actually as long as it is good, formalist poetry is very welcome. People who know their poetry know that so much emphasis on disregarding structure and an over-eagerness for expressing muh (superfluous) feelings is the mark of every shitty contemporary work
>>
It could make a comeback along with powdered wigs and the codpiece but it probably won't for similar reasons



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.