>be future me>lit autist>decades grinding the classics, whole pretentious sadboi canon>open laptop to "work on some of my own stuff", use AI “just to test something”>"Write a maximalist novel in the style of Infinite Jest meets Blood Meridian meets Gravity's Rainbow about a collapsing MFA program during a permanent economic depression.">mogged in 41 seconds>ok fine, fluke>"Write a 300-page hardboiled noir in perfect Chandler style set in rainy cyberpunk Chicago. Jaded PI protagonist, femme fatale with secrets, corrupt aldermen, and a plot twist that actually surprises.">done in 28 seconds, prose tighter than my ex's pussy>i still miss her, by the way.>"do 350-pages like Knausgård meets Houellebecq but funnier and meaner, about a depressed 4chan anon failing to write while AI writes better books than him.">finished in 31 seconds.>sit back>stare at my half-finished doc titled “Untitled #147 - Chapter 1 (maybe)”>realize I’ve spent 3 months writing 900 words and deleting 850 of them>post on /lit/>anons seething>"AI slop can't replace real literature">"soul is irreplaceable bro">"I'll keep reading the classics and support real authors">oh so you're telling me that when AI is good enough it can one shot a brand new novel in any genre or style you want, including the classics>you're just going to keep reading those classics anyway>and try to write something new yourself>all on your own huh>oh and you're just going to keep reading stuff other people wrote>to find new good writers>writing's not dead huh>yeah>sure sure sure>okay>whatever you say bud>idontbelieveyou.jpg
>>25209892I asked AI to write a gayer green test and it couldn't.
>>25209908>I asked AI to write a gayer green test and it couldn't.>anons seething
>be me>have sex with OP's mom>not that good, but I'm going through a dry spell>ejaculate my cum deep inside her loose orifice>leave>tfw this was twelve years ago>tfw my son is retarded
>>25209912>anons seething
>>25209892Yeah pretty much. But I guess as a writer, I have this itch that needs to be scratched that only writing scratches for me. I don't care that I can't live off of it. That was never on the cards for me. I don't even think people will read my work. It's not why I write. It sounds like you think writing will make you be someone. You are already someone anon. If you want to write, write.
>>25209912Made me kek
>>25209912>>be me>>have sexidontbelieveyou.jpg
>>25209892I don't really think it's a problem if you use AI to edit/rearrange a text. You're the one selecting which one sounds best and presenting it to the public. It's literally the same thing as being a professional photographer before digital photography: you can never be sure of the result, you give an imput to a machine, and select which outcome is best.What's wrong with doing this? It still feels very much like a book written by a human to me. On the other hand, I think it's very unlikely that AI starting from minimum prompts will generate entire novels worthy of being read. Most people who believe this don't seem to understand the basics of how AI works, what context and tokenization are, etc. - in general, it seems very difficult for AI to maintain context if you feed it large chunks of stuff or ask her to produce them from scratch. You can test this by feeding her anything from 5000+ words all together instead of in single chunks/paragraph: it is unable to simulate very basic reading comprehension tasks, structure long text, let alone producing them.I can't help but think most people who believe AI will replace creative activity entirely have never done anything creative and let billionares ejaculate tech propaganda into their brains. It was the same thing with VR bullshit and about 90% of technology they sold us in the last 30 years. It was always groundbreaking, but very few things stayed (internet, smartphones, social media) and almost never in the form and modalities in which they were first presented.I guess the same will be true to AI. Is being sold as a substitute of human work but there's no sign it will ever do stuff without constant human supervision. The jobs it really threatens to substitute were already robotic to begin with. It works quite well for beaurocratic stuff, coding, and as a super google, but as for the creative aspect of most jobs it seems to not hold up to the expectations/publicity
>>25209892Why weren't you able to get these AI novels published??? I'm confused. I thought they were masterpieces...
>>25209892if all it took was some LLM slop for you to get demoralized, you were never going to be a writer anyway.
