[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1768382993840322.png (794 KB, 625x1000)
794 KB
794 KB PNG
Were their books and other contemporaries at the time, just chick-lit with 19th century prose?
>>
>>25210203
If you'd read one you'd know the answer to this anon.
>>
>>25210215
>read
???
>>
>>25210203
Pride and Prejudice is the quintessential chick-lit. Every chick romance ever is Pride and Prejudice in another coat.
Wuthering Heights was okay.
>>
>>25210203
yes. everyone knows women can't write.
>>
>>25210274
If anything, Pride and Prejudice is also the proto-anime romcom. The plot is about two tsunderes falling for eachother, afterall.
>>
>>25210203
Austen? Sure, except for Lady Susan, Northanger Abbey and arguably S&S
Charlotte? Yep
Anne and Emily? Nah
>>
>>25210203
Austen? Sure, except for Lady Susan, Northanger Abbey and arguably S&S
Charlotte? Yep
Anne and Emily? Nah
>>
>>25210203
>chick-lit
Wuthering Heights is more of a cope-and-seethe-lit. Just shitty people being miserable and not getting what they want.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.