Are there any theoretical works which explore pornography as an explicitly right-wing phenomenon? Generally speaking pornigraphy is one of the most prominent examples of an enforcement of natural hierarchy today, in opposition to leftist notions of equality. The values which porn promotes are beauty, youth, strenght and virility, the same values as NatSoc basically. Also it is a strikingly vitalistic art form, not unlike what right-wing artist of the past such as D'Annunzio, Marinetti, Celine and Mishima were doing. I know BAP has written some tweets on this topic but I want something more comprehensive.
Put the sentence about suppressing gay thoughts back in your bait, you coward.
No, it's catering to those lower in hierarchy and giving them pleasure. It's giga left-wing if anything
I too can't wait for fascism, anon! I've been injecting copious amounts of estrogen and all!
>>25218698It’s like eating. You wouldn’t tell someone to survive only on hard-boiled eggs just because flavor might corrupt their taste and turn them into a fast food addict. Most people have the occasional indulgence and move on without obsessing over every bite.That’s whole anti porn thing sounds similar to the mindset behind bulimia or anorexia in teenage girls where fear of excess turns into denial. Not hard to see why many of the loudest voices in this community are teenage boys.
Note that this is one butthurt leftoid that keeps making these threads
>>25218972>Not hard to see why many of the loudest voices in this community are teenage boys.Well, here's the thing, teenage girls are vicious these days. And a man isn't legally allowed to manhandle them in anyway, which creates the frustration in the first place.
>>25219003why would a man be manhandeling teenage girls?
>>25218698>Are there any theoretical works which explore pornography as an explicitly right-wing phenomenon? Yes, but you won't like the answer
>>25218698>as an explicitly right-wing phenomenonI don't know, but wouldn't you like me find a book that talks about classical mechanics as an explicitely Hollywood-Polynesian intersectional phenomenom? This is how retarded you sound. If you want a book on pornography just read one, if it's relevant to chicken wings or whatever it will tell you.postdata: fell for this bait, it's been a while since I've opened this site. worst thing is, in all likeliness it isn't even bait it's just an idiosyncratic retard belonging to this board, or someone unironically looking for resources to make some specific argument online to a specific sort of person he already knows. lame as fuck
>>25219015also Meme Fantasies
>>25218972You have to be a severe porn addict to compare being anti-porn with being a bulimic. The negative effects of porn on men and women is well documented and largely harmful.
>>25219136porno doesnt matter except that porno is used as an excuse for women to divorce their husbands. thats how porno causes violence
>>25219136And so are negative effects of eating fast food. Billions of adults watch porn on a semi regular basis, we've yet to categorize porn addiction in DSM. It doesn't exist. You're just a midwit teenager with poor understanding of statistical inference. You're also likely brown.
>>25218698Pornography exists outside of modern culture wars
>>25219182
>>25219015>As children, Reich believed that members of the (German) proletariat learned from their parents to suppress nearly all sexual desire and – instead – expend the repressed energy into authoritarian idealism.[2] Is he ignoring that fascism was created by horny Italians? D'Annunzio was a perverted weirdo whose Fiume was a hotbed of sexual libertinism while Mussolini had a bunch of mistresses and was born into a leftist prole family as opposed to an uptight bourgeois German one described by W. Reich
>>25219203Oh yes, prostituting your daughters to porn agents and crippling your sons with porn addiction is the white pride way lol Keep making excuses for lounging in your filth and frying your brain fapping to pixels. The rest of us will enjoy the real thing.
>>25219136>The negative effects of porn on men and women is well documented and largely harmful.By frauds.
>>25218698>>25218991>I was scrolling /lit/ yesterday and remembered this guy's posts from then for whatever reason. Here we are today, lol. What a coincidence. On a serious note, as someone who leans left on many issues, Mishima is great. The left is missing and has always missed a certain masculine energy that you can only find in the schizophrenic ramblings of rightoid LARPers.
>>25218698Pornography is evil and anti-life so no, not unless you consider the devil to be "right wing".There is nothing "vital" in pornography, it is a dead, sterile mockery of sex. It, and especially modern pornography, is designed to vampirize your life energies, to take your time, your attention, your money. It serves entirely to sate and whet the appetites which should rather be mastered as a man masters his slaves. When slaves are given power over their superiors, disharmony and disorder reign.BAP and his ilk are not concerned with unity with God/Brahman/Allah/Tao/Nibbana/Monad/The One/Ein Sof/Logos/whatever else you call the transcendent supreme uncreated principle. They worship the self but pouring such energies into a thing that is ultimately not-a-thing in and of itself is just depleting yourself. The christian CS Lewis has an excellent analogy for this in his writings where "sin" depletes reality from the self and the more a person "sins" the more distant they grow from "God" and thus the less real they become, a process that continues infinitesimally with the "sinner" growing ever smaller and less real until they are like an muffled echo of a whisper.
>>25218972I would rather a man live off of hard-boiled eggs and bitter herbs if he cannot consume delicious food without becoming fat and decadent. By all means, moderation is superior still but if a person cannot handle indulgence then they should avoid it entirely.
>>25219819>The christian CS Lewis has an excellent analogy for this in his writings where "sin" depletes reality from the self and the more a person "sins" the more distant they grow from "God" and thus the less real they becomeThis assumes that your mind has all the toolkit necessary to accurately describe the structure and function of reality. That you have miraculously won the Magical Lottery Ticket so as to overcome neglect and cognitive biases via merely your intuition and intellection.(Whereas the history of humankind is a series of events, where you gradually get punched in the face for such self-complacency: first Galileo disproved you are the center of the universe; then Darwin disproved you are the pinnacle of creation; and now neuroscience is actively disproving that your consciousness is real.)In other words, this "the less real they become" is nothing but an empty meaningless platitude. You never had any true access to the reality, you can just stumble and blindly grasp.>The christian CS LewisThe friend of Tolkien, yes, and Tolkien in turn seethingly hated Frank Herbert's Dune, because of its opposite message: each time some bunch of morons believe that they have access to something true(tm) and real(tm), they fuck up royally and become the source of everybody else's problems.
>>25218698>>25218972Porn isn’t bad! It’s totally right-wing and based!
>>25218972abundant access to videos of people having sex is like a 30 year old phenomenon, it's pretty natural to wonder if it's harmful for us.
>>25220305abundant access to whiny racist incels is probably much worse
>>25219182I still don‘t know if the implication is that they actually will go "talk" to him or that because the chads are satisfying them with masculinity and babies the basedjak‘s strategy falls on its face.
>>25219457>15 year old forum post saying to trust the experts who want you to debase yourself in filth because uh…No thank you.
>>25220405YWNBAW
>>25220434>"Porn is addictive guys trust the science.">The science says porn isn't addictive.>"Yeah, that's what the (((science))) wants you to think."Stolen concept fallacy. Not an argument.
