if u read this u have played through philosophy.theres nothing more to philosophize about. period.stirner is also better than niezsche because hes more direct and less allegorical n shit.
Interesting bait
>>25219406>Interesting baityes, thats what your reply is
>>25219400You are one of the more tedious posters on /lot/. I've never read a single post of yours that held anything of interest or value. You can't even be bothered to type like a civilized educated man. Just endless reams of smug ironic shitposting.
>>25219416>ironicim being dead serious.
>>25219418So tell me then, what did he say that led you to the conclusion that you’ve “played through philosophy”? You didn’t really say much of anything in the OP except make a really retarded claim.
>>25219420>what did he say that led you to the conclusion that you’ve “played through philosophy”?philosophy is a spook. just like every other idea. once you reach that conclusion you have reached the final station of philosophy
>I take 4chan memes extremely seriously.>Why yes, I am an intellectual
>>25219423Ohhhh right, okay. Yeah, you said absolutely nothing again.
>>25219400I have an intuition that you are retarded, I say this as someone who loves Stirner more than anyone. What are you favorite quotes or passages?I like his description of Ownness, being an owner, because this is a better practical definition of what Master Morality consists in, of what Happiness for the powerful actually consists in, it's not the freedom as permission like the libertarians preach, there's nothing that feels good about merely being 'free' from things, what feels good is having the strength to have things and keep them, might is right, so if you have the might to have things for yourself this is how you have properties and have true Ownership of things, not because you begged for a Right for Property and Right for your life and begged for those to be respected, what feels good is to have the might to guarantee your life, it feels good because only then do you feel in control, with proper self-determination, self-creation. “If you think it over rightly, you do not want the freedom to have all these fine things, for with this freedom you still do not have them; you want really to have them, to call them yours and possess them as your property. Of what use is a freedom to you, indeed, if it brings in nothing? And, if you became free from everything, you would no longer have anything; for freedom is empty of substance. Whoever knows not how to make use of it, for him it has no value, this useless permission; but how I make use of it depends on my personality [Eigenheit]. I have no objection to freedom, but I wish more than freedom for you : you should not merely be rid of what you do not want; you should not only be a ' freeman', you should be an 'owner [Eigner] , Too.” — Stirner, The Ego and Its OwnI'd suggest reading all of Stirner's various articles available in the Anarchist Library, they're all just as good.
>>25219816Anon, this is a great post and all, but I’m not sure OP even read it. Might be wrong though.
>>25219400I would never in a million years listen to the opinion of someone who talks like this.
>>25219816>What are you favorite quotes or passages?i dont gotta prove shit to you nigga.
stirner was actually quite prescient. the "i live only for my own hedonism!" of recent generation that have caused the degeneration of society are due to us reaching the final stage of stirner's stages of history.
>>25219944>i live only for my own hedonism!Not what he says, nor advocates. Read the book. If hedonism doesnt serve you, dont live it. Why do niggas always pretend that everyone is a crude animal who would party all day, snort cocaine and have unprotected sex if left to their own devices? Stirner explains why: humanists are actually afraid of humans - the reason why the idea of "humanity" is worshipped now.
>>25219938You are absolute cancer. Incapable of offering anything of substance, and writing in moron vernacular. Why are you here?
>>25219994>Why are you here?To spread the word.
>>25219944>i live only for my own hedonism!You have not read the mans work
>>25219938and I thought you'd just like to share things, as one does when he finds something he enjoys and finds someone who enjoys that same thing, that's certainly how I enjoy to live my life. Do you think you've finished all thoughts? Are you not driven to discuss and see if you're missing some wisdom? Obviously not because you are retarded
>>25219944Someone already said this a few months ago, compelled me to find a quote of Stirner's take on Hedonism, and he does have one very specific passage for the 'pleasure-seekers', here have the quote:“Who, then, is 'self-sacrificing'? In the full sense, surely, he who ventures everything else for one thing, one object, one will, one passion. Is not the lover self-sacrificing who forsakes father and mother, endures all dangers and privations, to reach his goal? Or the ambitious man, who offers up all his desires, wishes, and satisfactions to the single passion, or the avaricious man who denies himself every thing to gather treasures, or the pleasure-seeker? He is ruled by a passion to which he brings the rest as sacrifices. And are these self-sacrificing people perchance not selfish, not egoist? As they have only one ruling passion, so they provide for only one satisfaction, but for this the more strenuously; they are wholly absorbed in it. Their entire activity is egoistic, but it is a one-sided, unopened, narrow egoism; it is possessedness.” -- Stirner, The Ego and Its Own
ZEN and the art of motorcycle maintenence and little prince are the only philosophy books you need
>>25219994>>25220236Agreed. It's actually disheartening to see how bad the intellectual discourse is on /lit/. Is this place really the best the internet has to offer?
