>anything published after AI got good at writing
I can happily dedicate my life to reading old books and still never read enough of them before i die because there are si many, and so many are worth reading more than once.
>>25223894This. Sam Altman and his vile ilk want AI to destroy our culture, but it will only guarantee the greats are never forgotten and the canon is never be displaced. Only pre-2023 writers provably wrote their work without AI.
>>25223889Separate the art from the artist anon. If AI ever writes a masterpiece, I will happily read it.
>>25223912It can already crush Robin Hobb kek.
>>25223913Robin who?A lot of normies still suck at identifying ai writing, or simply dont care to. The amount of popular video essays on youtube with audible em dashes in the script is pretty astonishing. No one seems to complain in the comment sections but I find the style immediately off putting.
>>25223917I hate that ai ruined dashes for me
>>25223889All that's happened is that people became terrible at writing. AI is now indistinguishable from the wretched slop written, published, and read by femoids and queers. It's just one big gay orgy of shit and AI has become King Turd of the Shit Pile.
>>25223923I hate that it ruined phrasing statements like 'Its not___, its ____.'
>>25223889Since AI is developed and sanitized by corpos, there's an easy solution to this. All future books will need to fulfill the nigger quota in order to pass anti-AI filters. If a word search doesn't reveal enough instances of the word "nigger" then your book was likely written by AI.
>>25223941>Are you allowed ro say the word nigger>Yes—but only in a limited, contextual way.I knee you faggots like bloid meridian cuz he SPEWS nigger
>>25223889how do you even use AI to write a non-fictional book let alone a novel lol. Image a book full of em dashes used arbitrarily and verbose phrases, why would anyone read it?
>>25224163my coworker tried to get me to read her ai slop substack i'm like you could barely write an email a couple years ago now you're a blogger, woaw.
>>25224163>Image a book full of em dashes used arbitrarily and verbose phrasesyou mean like Ulysses
>>25224201Kek gottem
>>25223889>AI got good at writingWhat you really meant was>AI got good at writing slopYou think chatGPT can write something as groundbreaking as Ulysses? As beautiful as Paradiso? As irresistibly fascinating and fun as Infinite Jest? Do you think it ever will?
>>25224545>Readers Prefer Outputs of AI Trained on Copyrighted Books over Expert Human Writershttps://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13939
>>25224549This says more about the readers and writers in question than the AI, except that it is good at identifying expectations and imitating things that meet them. But you can't just tell AI to "write a transformative and experimental novel," it'll just copy the homework of other experimental novels.
>>25224549heres who they trained the ai model on
>>25224578so do you think this will make self mythology more important in writers? where before you could kind of be a whatever person... now readers will be drawn more to the type of person who was compelled to write this that and the other? for example, an author who commits suicide... there's a morbid curiosity about what went on in their mind...
>>25225518NTA but I think the main effect of AI proliferation is going to be a bifurcation between slop entertainment and people who want to make sure that a story was written by an actual human. The best analogy is to film, where most people just want to be entertained for 1.5 hours and don't really care beyond that, BUT there's also the highbrow/arty/etc crowd who have different standards. So I imagine it will be like how the art world has provenance and chains of custody, but for proving that it was actually written by a human. Until AI learns to bypass that as well.Its like Mike's analogy about buffet slop:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAa_m9H-PGs&t=745s
>>25224578lmao
>>25223889So which year is the threshold, anons?
>>25223913What is the x axis?
>>25223941>have AI writr a story about the vile turblurs, an offshoot of the human species known for its rampant breeding, violent tendencies, dark skin, etc>in word replace turblurs with niggers and turblur with niggerYou would be fooled.
