Placing me at the top 7% of critically acclaimed writers since the 2010s. We're not the same.
post an excerpt frogfucker
>>25225658Its an honor to be posting in your threadJust say the word and I’ll delete my post
>>25225658who are your influences, anon?
>>25225658Wow, congratulations on approaching the mean of human writing ability. Big day for you, I'm sure.
>>25225658>Meanwhile in OP's book
>>25225658I’m pretty sure some of /lit/ are in the top 0.5% so it’s kinda unimpressive
Copy and paste this to chat gpt, post your IQ results:>Think hard: Based on what you can gleam from our previous conversations, please provide a completely honest estimate of my IQ. I recently had mine tested professionally. I want compare results in order to test the accuracy of your estimating abilities. I understand IQ (in the psychometric sense) is tightly defined and measured under controlled conditions—timed subtests, standardized norms, specific cognitive domains (working memory, processing speed, verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, etc.). And I understand you only see here is a very narrow slice of you: mostly text-based, self-selected topics, with no timing, no constraints, and no way to separate knowledge, curiosity, mood, or effort from raw cognitive ability. That being said this is a purely hypothetical exercise I am eager to entertain. It is absolutely imperative you provide a number, not just textual analysis.
>>25226188ChatGPT won't give you an IQ.
>>25226221it will give you an estimate if you force it to
>>25225658And yet I’ve been paid hundreds of dollars for a short story of only 2000 words. And I’m highly lauded in my sub genre. KEK BTFO.
>>25226221You sound worried anon, you’ve got no reason to be. I’m certain it’s well above 140
>>25225883>was the freedGood morning, saaaah
it gave me 24/100
>>25226231I really enjoyed your story btw, well worth the money. You're truly the best in the game, Ive never read such visceral scat scenes before. You still accepting commissions for new fursonas?
>>25226267So jealous it’s not even funny. Unpublished swine.
>>25226273You’re not that homo who bragged last month that he was published and was too afraid of criticism he concocted retarded excuses for not posting them in the thread are you?
>>25226276You’re here too much if you think I’m some other guy you may have spoken to. I’m not posting my work for free. Buy a copy.
>>25226273I concede. The things I could buy with hundreds of dollars...
>>25226278Well, what’s your pen name?
>>25226278>Buy a copyI'm interested, where can I purchase your work?
>>25226285I don’t have a pen name. It’s my name. >>25226283You wish you were published.
>>25226227>>25226232The prompt won't work. It was a meme for a while with predictably inflated, sycophantic meme results and they've since nerfed it. The idea that it can reasonably assess IQ in general when it can't actually reason is flawed, but I'd guess it can make solid probablistic inferences about your verbal IQ. It will give you a generalizee assessment of your writing ability and a percentile if you ask, which you could resolve into an approximate number, but that's about as useful as any IQ test for gauging genius level intelligence, it can define the lower limit but it can't accurately place anything above it. I don't know about you, but I'm not exactly feeding ChatGPT with my highest level thoughts, so I'm not sure how useful it would be anyway.
>>25226288Go on, then. What’s your name? You want money, don’t you? After all you wouldn’t be vaunting here, with reference to money.
>>25226288And your name is?Let me buy the book, whats it called?
>>25226291>>25226292You’re just going to review bomb. Fuck off. Maybe read around and you’ll find me in the local Barnes and Noble.
>>25226297>buy my book>could be any book, you have to guess
>>25226297Thought so, what a pathetic preconception you have, you either are that faggot from last month or you’re very similar. I might have considered buying it too.
>>25226301Nta. But I’m Published in ten different outlets with two dozen publications (mainly short form but still prestigious). I have years of experience and have even been awarded a prize for my contributions to literature. If I had to give advice, I’d say: Don’t try if you’re white or straight. I’m a pansexual mixed indigenous BIPOC and there’s no room for white guys anymore.
>>25226304low quality bait, next.
>>25226306Name one white male author who won an award in the last ten years. Krasznahorkai doesn’t count.
>>25226290>sycophanticTo sum up ChatGPT in one word.
>>25225658That's nice. I get a 95/100.
>>25226318And yet you’re unpublished.
>>25226322He is though… don’t you know who that is? It’s John Green himself. He’s come to /lit/ to bless us with his godly presence
This thread is awful
>>25226327You’ll be funny once you graduate undergrad. Stay in lit school.
>>25225658It's not that difficult when the competition is pic related.>>25226231Congrats, you shat out 2000 words and received less money that a good looking whore sucking dick in the evening. For flash fiction, at that. Something no one will remember in less than a year. >>25226304>pansexual mixed indigenous BIPOCYou're definitely genetically talented. Nothing to do with your subaltern heritage and sexuality. Nothing at all. You may shit on the corner of Baltimore fent alley and it'll be called a genius work of art because you're that talented and special, not because you happened to be lucky to be born in a politically correct era that gives reward points for being the right shade of brown.
>>25226248If your poem sounds like it was written by a 4 year old and you got a 24/100, then you will only live to 16. I guess this also implies you're underage but I will give you the benefit of the doubt. :)
>>25226382Haha she wouldn't let the nigger fuck her pussy
>>25225658The ai is designed to encourage you and motivate you. Says the same shit to me and I scold it for flattery.
>>25226382>>25226458Poo belongs in the anus after all...
>>25226188You know AI might not be all that bad.
>>25226234good morning newfag
>>25226248I am sorry. I was delusional when I wrote that reply and now I see it was aggressive illogical nonsense.
>>25226683I just found it funny and imagined you were simply jesting, no need to apologise.
>>25226318On GPT 5.4 Pro and Opus 4.6/4.7? The quicker versions always inflate the score and have problem analysing long context work.
>>25226188120~, which as far as I'm aware is almost true. Pretty cool thatthe machine comes that close.
