[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.25226757
No.25226757 Archived
Were the race-science books of the 1920-30s well written and argumented or just slop pseudoscience for edgelords and equivalent to today's "woke" science in merits?
>>
Anonymous
 No.25226770
No.25226770
>>25226757
They were suppressed because their findings were inconvenient to the race communist jews. If you ask why Darwin isn't suppressed in the same way you're literally genociding my ideology.
>>
Anonymous
 No.25226862
No.25226862
>>25226757
I only read american authors of this genre, namely Madison Grant and Lothrop Stoddard. They are logical in their assumptions and conclusions and time has proven them mostly right
>>
Anonymous
 No.25226869
No.25226869
Rosenberg and Chamberlain were almost schizos Hans F. K. Günther was more grounded and still holds up imo
>>
Anonymous
 No.25226945
No.25226945
myth of the 20th century isnt a race science book is it?
>>
Anonymous
 No.25227017
No.25227017
>>25226945
Nobody has read it ever bro.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.