We're waiting...
>>25230613its over
Don't know who this faggot is. But i can tell you right now humans will be a spacefaring race in the future unless we really all do get nuked in the next decade. Oh wait that's actually possible!
>>25230613All modern politics revolves around trying to be The Last Men. We are literally fighting a regime change war in Iran right now so they can all have OnlyFans and Euphoria in the country. People just go about wanting to be The Last Men in different ways. Very, very few people actually disagree with the whole liberal order and our mass consumer civilization of mutts, and the ones who do like Elon Musk are still industrialist capitalists who work towards creating that world regardless so his word is moot. Everything just boils down to "you fucking libtards I want LESS fat black women on my Calvin Klein supermodel billboards." Fukuyama was right.
>>25230695The dull and primitive state... we're living in it....
>>25230695Cope harderLiberalism is a death cult that destroys birth rates and human spirit
>>25230991Uh birth rates need to go down. You can't just breed infinite people forever and expect the Earth to support that sweaty
>>25231003Capitalism wants eternal growth, though. That's why there's mass migration, or the economic reason for it, that is.
>>25230991Yes. And it’s winning. Everything is going according to plan. What people interpret as liberalism’s failings (demographic replacement, cultural decline, deterioration of gender relations, internet addiction, political polarization, moral decay) is actually liberalism working as intended. This is what you all fail to get.
>>25230613
>>25230695>>25231008These will be the only intelligent responses ITT>>25230991>Liberalism is a death cult that destroys birth rates and human spiritAnd?
>>25231988Billions must die in two more weeks!
>>25232095No one will die. You'll just choose to lock yourself into the AI powered goon cage
>>25230613This nigga wrote an entire follow up book that essentially refuted the libtard end of history thesis, and it's like he's forgotten about it entirely and nobody else has read it. Meanwhile NYT is running shit like this article just today to the side of daily AI and robotic advances and ghouls teaching neurons to play Doom: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/24/magazine/eternal-life-longevity-world-leaders.html?smid=url-share
>>25232140He genuinely doesn't even understand his own beliefs these days. He thinks Trump is some great opponent of liberalism when in reality it directly produced him. He even predicted it somewhat in his own book >>25231963
>taking dialectics seriously in the year of our lord 2046
>>25231008You seem to not be able to discern neoliberalism and classical liberalism and thats okay.
>>25233171Does it even matter at this point? It's like pointing out that early Christianity was quite different than Christianity today.
>>25231005Ok but they could just stay in their own country. My thesis is that its just likely that the average brown person cannot go a single day without living under a tin pot dictator and they can't adjust to the conditions of liberalism. They're just hardwired to be boot lickers.
>>25233175It matters quite a bit. Thats why there's different interpretations of church in different sects. And yet, they manage to coexist.
>>25231008>liberalism wins when it replaces liberal populations with non-liberal populations
>>25230613>We're waiting...Yeah it's not coming. Fukuyama argued that humans revolted when they weren't recognized, and that, as such, liberal democracies enabled everyone to be recognized politically, making political revolts obsolete. This is an already spurious claim. But the idea that liberal democracies are uniquely excellent at doing so is even more spurious. The entirety of the populist alt-right wave precisely occurred because people don't feel represented in politics. The migrant crisis is exactly what happens when 2 different "recognitions" are not really compatible with each other without implying some contradictory practicality. Economics are also completely absent from Fukuyama's kojèvian reading of society, given that he doesn't adress the glaring issue of capitalist relationships not "recognizing" the worker/consumer's interests. In fact, Kojève himself hinted towards marxism without directly advocating for him precisely because of this iirc.Beyond that, the biggest issue with Fukuyama is thinking that change is endogenous to society, rather than exogenous. Liberalism will collapse because of external pressure. Internally ? It'll just decline very slowly.>>25230695>Very, very few people actually disagree with the whole liberal order and our mass consumer civilization of muttsThere's a lot of them, in fact. The liberal order has only started declining in the past 10 to 15 years. Where do you think it'll be in 30 to 50 years ? The 08 crisis was the beginning of trouble and everything has gotten downhill since the 2010s. Everyone understands that thing will at most only stay the way they are, and that they'll realistically get worse.>Everything just boils down to "you fucking libtards I want LESS fat black women on my Calvin Klein supermodel billboards."That's inherently ANTI fukuyama and liberal. The whole point of liberalism is precisely to sacralize human dignity and enable anyone to dispose of their rights. Saying that, because you're a fat black trans woman, you can't be on a billboard is inherently saying "Sorry, but I care more about your appearance than your individuality". It's why stuff like the migrant crisis profoundly reshapes the political consciousness, because it's a mass phenomenon of people stripping themselves of their fake liberal-esque morals and finally admitting that all they cared about was personal interests.
>>25233319>Liberalism will collapse because of external pressure. Internally ? It'll just decline very slowly.and if order is restored, then what? history doesn't remain in one place.
