This book is an utter TRVTH BOMB. Why did it cause so much seethe?
>>25232217A trve trvke can elicit no other reaction.
>moves to the netherlands>becomes insane
>>25232217The curse of Hegel takes many forms. All are to be embraced to overcome them
Lol
>>25232306Maybe fatty could have done with some more exercise ie. FUCKIN'
>>25232217Because it was written by a schizo who was wrong about everything?
>>25232306I miss the days when feminism was just a big cat-fight.Modern feminists are collectivised drones who never criticise one another. Which is why feminism has become a shapeless mass of contradictory opinions.
>>25232306It's actually worse than this if you read it. Dworkin was genuinely insane, not in a "wow how transgressive" way but a "sleeping beauty was an orchestrated plot to promote rape"[totally unironic iirc] way. Anyone woman who has ever taken Dworkin seriously is basically worthless and, if she seems normal, is likely lying to you about her actual beliefs. t. Dated a couple of radfems (their obsession with pedophilia is projective btw)
>>25232619Like?
How exactly is Dworkin wrong? Just look at the way men online react to e.g. Alysa Liu. It's obvious that finding people attractive is rooted in misogyny.
>>25233218>objective analysis of female behavior is misogynyHope she sees this, bro
>>25232619Isn't it basically completely true though?I can only get off to sluts that I have zero respect for. The thought of having sex with my female friends who I respect disgusts me. That's one reason I'm still a virgin.You have to admit there is something inherently degrading about the act of penetration.
>>25232648Okay but in the earliest recorded version of sleeping beauty from the 16th century the prince did genuinely rape sleeping beauty and she woke up after giving birth to his child so...
>>25233419My feelings are the opposite. I'm gay so this might be different, but I cannot be aroused by guys I don't respect, who seem base or unintelligent. And I am a top/dominant too. I can only be attracted to people who are sensitive, cute, bookish, dignified
>>25233419Your mistake is in thinking that there is something inherently bad in hierarchization, some people are naturally more dominant and some people are naturally more submissive, this has its roots in nature, because the forces of darwinian evolution have shaped humans, and indeed the entire animal kingdom, towards specialization, which in short means that things in general work better when there's an animal A specialized in task A and animal B specialized in task B instead of both of them being able to perform both tasks but at 50% capacity. The most of common form of this is an hierarchy, and in humans it becomes degrading only when not freely chosen. For example, when you go to university you implicitly accept the authority the professor has over you, and you don't resent that unless you think the professor is incompetent. Sex is the same way. Some (most) women want to be submissive, but to a worthy man and not just anybody, and likewise men want to protect a woman, but they want to protect their special one and not just any used up slut.
>>25233284Nobody wants to fuck you, poltardo
>>25233419>You have to admit there is something inherently degrading about the act of penetrationYou really don't
>>25232648the odyssey was a fefail/simp plot to promote fefails seeking their true love outside of marriage and fefail custody of children by accusing men of being absentee/abusive like odysseus. however in a comedic twist penelope is too much of a slut to choose one of the suitors so she leads them all on indefinitely
>>25233284Who's saying anything about behavior? This is about sexuality at its core. Male sexuality is about objectifying women. Female sexuality is basically just masochism (if a woman is into you it means she likes the idea of being objectified by you).
>>25233787>Male sexuality is about objectifying women. Female sexuality is basically just masochismso yeah, the Biblical concept that the man loves the woman as Christ loves His church and is ready to die for her, and the woman loves the man as the church loves Christ and honors and obeys him, thats incompatible with the concept of sexuality
>>25233419I don't feel that way but I was also raised as a fundie
>>25233667You think I actually care about consent. Lmao, even.Now I'm in the process of writing an entire rebuttal to Dworkin.
>>25232629Terfs?
>>25233713Our entire society, mores, language, etc. agree that being penetrated is humiliating. Why do you think calling men gay is an insult?
>>25234036That doesn't necessarily say anything about the act itself. The theory of humors was widely agreed upon for thousands of years, for example.
Male sexuality be like>I want rapefleshFemale sexuality be like>I want a tall Dark Triad chad psycho
>>25234131Then what *does* say something about the act?
>>25234144>experts say
>>25233419If anything, I have the opposite problem. I'm only attracted to people I like as people, which means I'm attracted to hardly any women, because they're boring and stupid.
>>25233421That does not actually support her thesis. Hansel and Gretel was not part of a plot by a coven of witches to normalize cannibalizing children. >>25233218You have downs syndrome if you aren't trolling.>>25233284Lol>>25233729Now THIS is scholarship
>>25233419No lol what the fuck is wrong with you. By fucking my woman I make her a part of myself, and I hers. Yes it's subjugation but that isn't inherently degrading. Women are elevated by joining with and serving men.
>>25234144why would that make them unemployable?
>>25232619When did fuck did my wife start writing books?!
>>25234632Being attracted to Alysa Liu means you claim mental ownership of her. Either because of racialization (her hapa-ness), eugenics (test tube baby status), or plain old objectification (liking her face/smile, legs, youth). The "shocking" tweets posted above is just what every man thinks (except maybe the cringe politicsplay with the MAGA stuff) but society makes us not say it out loud because it would be too creepy
>>25234674Women do all the hiring now.
>>25233218I can't imagine being so retarded that you politicize your sexual intercourse. Left, right, it doesn't matter anymore. It's fucking over for humans >Why women have better sex under communism
>>25235513Accidentally hit post too soon. Shit like this and books like "Why women have better sex under socialism" are so fucking stupid
>>25234674Foids will strart suing companies because the work environment is le hostile.
>>25234674because you have zero clue how to interact in a situation other than being told "mmm youre so big daddy"
>>25234036Even though Dwarkin is a fat radfem, I think she is right about this - being penetrated is inherently subjugating and degrading. Women will let you penetrate them because they enjoy being dominated/ subjugated by men they are attracted to.
