We're gonna take literature back from the chicks and asians, it's gonna be ours again.
>>25237429What about the Jews?
>>25237432Fuck 'em. Fuck those motherfuckers.
>>25237436And the LGBTLMNOPs?
cheers, lad. it has already begun.
>>25237442Gays never wronged me, some of them have been friends. We'll spare em.
>>25237446A few have, but some haven't. They're a mixed bag to me.
>>25237446How are we taking back writing if their so called works are prioritized instead of them being stigmatized or remaining closeted as they should be?
Preach brother! Let us start right this moment, by writing the best literature book ever, I'll start:The
>>25237485We're taking back the whole motherfucking literary industry, right out of the hands of those slanted eyed fucks and hysterical harpies. Under our leadership, we'll make the queers return to their stature of Mishima and Capote, respectable homos who created great works.
>>25237429What major billionaire's backing do we have? Does Musk or Thiel even care about the state of literature? They only care about our wordcel talent if we channel it to political garbage. They care more about litmus testing us than making us useful. Our society is ruined by the ultra rich now more than in a very long time. Wealthy white men have abandoned the defense of literature
>>25237429we should make it illegal for women to learn to read or drive cars
>>25237429Can't wait to read all the books you fine gentlemen write.
>>25237501nobody needs billionaire backing to write something great and publish it.>>25237502those are some pretty sweet kicks, bro.
I'm going to cry.
rich people dont sponsor artists anymore
>>25237495>starting our masterpiece with Thethis is why we lost our literature to the asian chicks
>>25237521White men are only allowed to be skilled at slop, like Project Hail Mary or Brian Sanderson. White men don't write expecting to be able to make a good chunk of money off an artistic debut novel. Women of all kind get book deals for artistic debut novels quite readily by comparison, though that doesn't mean it's the easiest thing to do either
Let’s get rid of the Nobel Prizes too while we’re at it. A husk of what it once was.
>>25237572Women aren't capable of art.
>>25237429Step 1: Total school takeover. Bring back gender segregation. Boys should not be forced to read shit written by or for women. Feed these lads nothing but the manliest of /lit/.
>>25237684The type of shit you find when you pull out a random book from your single aunts bookshelf.
>>25237445Shalom, Rabbi
>>25237442don't you understand that the arc of history boils down to a great war between the gays and the jews? how retarded can you be to not see it?they have been seething ever since Hadrian crushed them.
>>25237779I think thats pushing it a bit far
>>25237429We sure will. That's why anon's short story's been sitting at 1 reply for over a day. But we'll definitely do it with more frogs and Tolstoevski threads.
>>25237924That story was trash
>>25237779It's notable that many famous gay writers have been anti-Semites. Christopher Marlowe, Christopher Isherwood, Truman Capote, Evelyn Waugh, the list goes on
>>25237951Gore Vidal...
>>25237951anti-semitism was common back then. it's not some "gay" trait.
>>25237981Cope. We all know about the eternal war being the Jew and the Homo
>>25237429Already is lol im banning them rn
>>25237502What's the punishment if they are caught being literate?
>>25237700They're still funded to try it by other women. Rich men don't support literature anymore for other men.
>>25238011cite source.
>>25238027spiffytickler
viva la revolucion ;)
>>25237429Let's be more specific.Is this one any good?
>>25238064Buy an ad, you dysgenic jew
>>25238099cry for me more, bitch.can't reply unless you're A20 or above and aryan btw.
>>25238019Okay. I didn't argue otherwise, just that women aren't capable of art. They're not producing artistic debut novels or artistic novels at all. They are the primary source of slop, and not simply as a function of their predominance in being published, but because they are objects of beauty and not admirers of it, because the heights of intelligence that produce art are outside of their grasp, and because they have never and can never know the kind of suffering that produces it.
>>25238115>women aren't capable of artSappho, Yourcenar, Dickinson are pretty good>objects of beautyHardly..
>>25238121Not art.
>>25238112>cry for me more, bitch.>can't reply unless you're A20 or above and aryan btwSure, rabbi
>>25238124why do you keep posting selfies bro? maybe get a haircut and face transplant first.
>>25237700>>25238123This thread is about men.Post art written by men.Published in the last 10 years, if you can.
>>25238131Category error. It's about taking literature back from females, Asians, and also Jews and outed homosexuals.
>>25238115You're conflating different kinds of slops from what I originally meant. Women are still being funded to try to create art, even if it's artslop. Men only get funded if they try to push slop from the start, whether it's Stephen King or Sanderson. Some woman that divorced a wealthy man (or gets a sufficient allowance from him) will fund women artslop out of her own vanity as a hobby and to keep herself occupied. Wealthy men aren't doing the equivalent of trying to fund male authors. Men are being gatekept because there aren't any male financial backers letting men in through the gates. The rich socialite women don't care as much about financial returns, they just like being able to tell their friends they funded the latest Asian-America diaspora experience novel, or some non-binary memoir. They like the cultural currency that gives them. Rich men don't. Elon Musk doesn't care to brag about funding a young white man's reflective novel.
>>25238154why do you care so much about "funding?" writing requires an idea and a word processor. Amazon KDP does everything else basically for free. you want UBI for being a writer? just put your shit into the marketplace and if it's great, it will succeed.
>>25238162>just put your shit into the marketplace and if it's great, it will succeed.
>>25238150Yeah, that.Post it.
>>25238174plenty of books at big publishing houses with expensive marketing pushes sell almost nothing. money doesn't make your story better.
>>25238182and they still choose to sell almost nothing from some authors than othersfeels like you're being intentionally obtuse
>>25238269my point is - who gives a fuck what they choose?you really want to seek the approval of irrelevant idiot women and take your 12% residuals from a publishing house?write your thing exactly how you want, publish it on KDP and collect 70% residuals.fuck the gatekeepers, they literally do not matter anymore.
>>25238287>>25190464
>>25238287>you really want to seek the approval of irrelevant idiot womenthis proves you aren't reading things closely and are just posting emotionally for whatever reason
>>25238299This guy is saying that exposure is paramount, you can't just hope the goodness carries it, at least not all the way through, like this guy thinks the other guy thinks. It is unclear still specifically why he thinks funding is important; could be hes talking about how money is important to support you and yours, because he knows what it is like to scrap; or maybe he's talking about how annoying is to see all the pure slop that gets pushed down peoples throats, or a lamentation of having a culture with no culture, etc etc it could be any number of things. So stop being so vague, next time you say something check if is transmitting what you FEEL about the subject, with just the words. If it could be taken a number of ways, you've said nothing>>25238287This guy is saying don't worry about "losing" that story if you make the mistake of saving money in advertisement; just throw shit out there. If you have gold in you, it'll come out in every piece, stop worrying it's a one time hard yellow shit.So they're both right
>>25238603>stop worrying it's a one time hard yellow shitwhat did he mean by this?
