[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


normies are having wild, no-strings-attached, casual sex on one hand and they collectively clown on the remaining few tradcons who still treat it as some sacred communion instead of just another pleasurable bodily function like taking a shit or something, but at the same time no one gets threat profiled more than the guy who approaches women for sex who is often seen as just committing the moral crime of "objectification".
>>
>>25240251
What does this have to do with literature?
>>/r9k/
>>
Who cares, all noise.
>>
>>25240251
You haven't taken a look at modern western society in a while. Almost no one is having sex anymore.
>>
>>25240251
>Possibly one of the ugliest men I've ever seen in my life
>Always talking about slaying pussy
Doesn't make any sense.
>>
>>25240251
>Normies
>Think
Lol. Lmao even
>>
The way I looked at it during my first couple of years at university were: why would I say no to easy casual sex when it is so freely available? If everybody's getting on it, I want a piece of it too. In a sexually liberal society, where one night stands and fuck buddies are accepted and common-place, very few will say no to casual sex - as humans our impulses and desire for sex overpower any moral concerns about the sanctity of intercourse, the sin of fornication blah blah blah.
I don't engage in casual sex anymore as I am trying to live in accordance with God's will. Also, I think the transient relationships I had have affected my ability to form more intimate romantic relationships - I tend to see them simply as a way to get regular sex.
>>
>>25240841
sartre was fucking groupies daily. french women really value intelligence / power / influence / authority.
>>
>>25241274
Also Houellebecq is right. Sexual liberalism has had terrible consequences for dating/relationships - both individually and on a societal scale.
>>
>>25240251
Because women, at their core, really are objects. Its just that no one has the guts to say it. They're a means to fulfill a biological end.
>>
>>25240251
Normies do not think, first of all. Secondly, their urges are torn between liberation and security. They want to be unshackled, but also want to still live within the bounds of something that could be considered civilization. Liberation outside of the bounds of civilization is simply a cave man bonking a woman on the head with a club and dragging her home.
>>
>>25240251
>normies are having wild, no-strings-attached, casual sex
Ahahahaha
>>
>>25240841
>he thinks looks matter
What really matters is power and attitude. The former brings women to you, and you need the latter to stop them from giving you trouble. (As many celebrities and kings who were too wimpy found out)



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.