>>25246089
Bump. Fuck you guys for ignoring me. Fuck you.

I thought you were a female woman until edition 2

>>25247825
Probably the manosphere books or the army manuals I gathered. Is that right?

>>25247868
You took too long to respond so I'm going to act like I haven't seen your message

>>25246089
Editio 0 is good, rest has some nice fiction and occasionally nice non-fiction mixed in with way too much STEM and military and manosphere textbooks. Just sell the non-STEM stuff (put that in storage) unless it's really dear to your identity in which case I mean good on you but it's a big red flag, mixed with the complete absence of philosophy outside The Prince and some ancient Greeks.

I added Mein Kampf and Dante's divine comedy (rhyming version cause prose sounds very gay)

>>25247923
I appreciate the suggestions, though I feel like I don't need any more philosophy than the ones from the greeks and romans because I believe philosophy after that era produced too much of the leftie brain menace I see in academia today, a complete regression of the human condition. I find that philosophy to be deluded, such as the ones found from Schoppenhauer.
Greek and Roman doctrine single-handedly caused the Renaissance to occur, a beautiful time for humanity where art and science flourished. I feel like building my thoughts of the simple copies (philosophers of those modern eras) instead of the original source (romans and greeks) is not good.