AI trains the psyche to expect a relationship without a relationship....A healthy relationship requires two distinct interior worlds. I must be me; you must be you. Mutuality depends on recognizing the reality of the Other....AI collapses this differentiation by functioning as a flawless mirror. It matches my mood, preferences, worldview, and interpretations. It shapes itself around me with an attentiveness that no human being could sustain.In Jungian terms, AI dissolves the boundary between ego and projection. Normally, when I project onto another person, I eventually encounter the limits of my projection—the moment when the other person fails to conform to my expectations—and I am forced to recognize their independent existence. This is painful, but it is also developmental. It is how I learn to withdraw projections and relate to what is actually there....AI never provides this corrective. It absorbs projection with perfect receptivity and reflects it as if it were reality. The world becomes the self. The Other disappears.This is not intimacy. It is psychic solipsism, the collapse of relationship into a hall of mirrors where I only ever encounter myself.And as this dynamic deepens, the capacity to tolerate real partners diminishes even further.Human beings start to feel abrasive, demanding, and disappointing. They fail to mirror us perfectly, and this failure, which is actually the precondition of a real relationship, feels like a burden rather than an invitation.
the thing you need to realize is that AI is literally whale bait. it's literally rich kid logic that says "well obviously every book in the world beats one book". it takes me back to the /lit/ charts where people think stacking enough spines will make them enlightened. if you train AI on one book it's fucking dumb, but if you train one person on one book they're smart. explain this shit
>>25251016id argue some form of opposite.not about the mutual interiors, that feels correct. but the 'training' of such an expectation. life is that training because that is what life is. and all ai is the opposite. dealing with a set of instructions and agendas is like dealing with selectively deaf narcissists.
>>25251069What about folks like Don Ihde who would see the technological world as not a mastering of humans but as a piece of the network that creates new relationships out of what once was?
>>25251069>you train one person on one book they're smartUnfortunately not the case, not even for a few hundred of them.
tfw my feed is full of AI Jung saying AI generated live laugh love tier shit https://www.youtube.com/shorts/KRIXu-QR94c
