[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_9847.jpg (2.38 MB, 4032x3024)
2.38 MB JPG
im in a celtic mood this spring
>>
I don't understand, have never understood, you shelf/stack fags.
Not only is it consumerist vanity, it makes absolutely no sense as a marker of anything.
When retards on /mu/, /tv/, or wherever else do chart threads, etc., the assumption is that their vapid pretense of a personality through a selection of media was at least listened to/watched beforehand.
But with stack threads here, it's like: let me show my taste of things I haven't even read yet.
What?
>Rate my stack
So you want people to give you opinions on whether the books you already own, already plan on reading, are worth reading, or somehow make you cool?
Seriously what the fuck is the point?
>>
Doesn't it get tiring reading back to back books on the same topic?
>>
>spring
it's technically celtic summer
>>
>>25253292
I don't like a book discussion forum is for you
>>
File: IMG_9589.jpg (1.18 MB, 975x1155)
1.18 MB JPG
>>25253292
….sorry…
>>
>>25253355
Nta but how do you intend to discuss books you haven't read yet?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.