>there is no seduction which cannot at some point be construed as intrusion or harassment because there will always be a point when one has to expose oneself and ‘make a pass’. But, of course, seduction doesn’t involve incorrect harassment throughout. When you make a pass, you expose yourself to the Other (the potential partner), and her reaction will determine whether what you just did was harassment or a successful act of seduction.
>>25256505You actually made this thread. Shame on you.
>>25256505And yes, obviously he's right. This is well known.
>>25256505Basically this meme and yes he is right
>>25256505I hate to give him credit but sure
>>25256505He's a hit or miss as always, but this time I agree. I guess being labeled as a "politically incorrect" thinker had him spew some truths now and then, though I've been reading pic rel lately and it has some issues, to say the least.
>>25256505eurofag here,can someone explain to me how are americans expected to meet romantic partners without making a pass (aka "harassment")? It seems the current post-metoo discourse they automatically labels anyone ( be it a male confessing to a female friend, or a man just chatting a woman up because he thinks she's hot) as lewd and objectifying. Where do they expect us to meet and how?
>>25256505This is true but also sexual harassers (ugly and/or shy men) should be publically shamed, imprisoned, and potentially castrated
Wrong, there always must be plausible deniability in every pass. In fact, if you make a pass without this, even if the woman would be otherwise receptive, she may as well decide you are a man without savoir faire, which is the absence of an attractive quality which she had presupposed you had. Thus you are no longer the "real deal", and the ideology that drew her to you is instantly dissipated by the reality.
>>25256593You hustle and grind until you're important enough to get invited into an Epstein network, or you pay a jewish dating app company to allow you access to hot young women looking for casual sex (which the jewish media *strongly* encourages of them).Don't like it? Sorry, thats sexual assult and straight to a jewish owned private prison with you to work in a jewish owned factory making belt buckles for the military industrial complex (high wasp/satanist) for pennies on the dollar.
>>25256505I agree. Honestly I think sex is just rape with better PR. Approaching a woman feels oddly predatory and unnerving
>>25256604 my female friend, whenever she's in the car with me, starts making jokes about me kidnapping her. "You could kidnap me" "You could literally kindap me if you wanted right now" "Would you kidnap me?"
>>25256601Lacking this supreme finess, you can always grab them and rape them. Women are surprisingly moved by the dramtic display of attraction, and being the more compassionate gender, always willing to forgive. Just dont ever try to persue them in a straightforward and uncomplicated way. Such a thing is grossly passé and, if they don't immediately lose all respect for you, will make them feel very unsafe in your presence
>>25256616>Lacking this supreme finess, you can always grab them and rape them.I don't have an h1b
>>25256601why do neurotypicals play these games?
>>25256604how do americans coincide the belief that a man wanting to fuck a woman is 'objectifying' her, but at the same time celebrate slutwalks and maintain the position that having no-strings-attached sex is some liberatory act that freed sex from prudish morality?
>>25256505Sexbots with artificial wombs are or destiny. Let's just fast track them already.
>>25256887Because in those scenarios the woman is objectifying herself, so she has more agency
>>25256604>Chad Bataille vs Virgin DworkinChecks out.
>>25256613women are so fucking bad at flirting it's not even funny anymore
>>25256505This charlatan uses the Other for everything and halfwits who majored in English (not Philosophy) eat it up like their certified goyslop
>>25256914english and psychology
>>25256887>how do americans coincideThe word you are looking for is reconcile, esl-kun
>>25256601>Wrong, there always must be plausible deniability in every passBaby it's cold outside, basically.
>>25256854Please read The Misanthrope, Molière
>>25256505Aristotle claims that if socrates is a man and all men are mortal then that socrates is a mortal
>>25256505I wouldn't call it dating advice but yeah, whatever.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FgxacX72snA&ra=m
>>25257120Socrates is a woman tho
>>25256601How's that working out for youMost modern guys would be a lot better off being a lot more Indian about things and forgetting the "plausible deniability" and just making your intentions directly known.>>25256602This is what terminal jooferism looks like. You become so helpless because of the all powerful joos that you can't get a date.Guess what you will not go to prison. The bolder you are the less likely that is. It is the fearful and timid who get the hammer coming down on them, because they flinched.
>>25257135Cash’s mom is a fish
>>25256505The phone world were in now makes the consequence of a failed attempt so much more brutal to go through. He's correct it just will never work as intended ever again.
>>25257177I have told multiple women myself that I have been a abusive and I am a sex offender and it has not impacted me negatively at all
>>25257186Neat.
>>25257152he was joking bro
>>25257152>How's that working out for youI'm moving with girls 20 years younger than I am, or at least as close to that while still being legal. I flirt with and could pull women who were younger
>>25257197By being a pussy? Alright then>>25257191And if he wasn't? Are you prepared to say he's wrong?
>>25256613if you took her up on her offer and indulged in her rape fantasy she would still consider falsely accusing you. risk is double if she's a liberal white woman.
>>25257197no you don't and no you can't
>thing>thing but it's not donewhy bother?
this kind of shit is so fucking dumb. grow up man.
>>25257504There's almost no risk. Stop being such a fucking pussy and stop scaring others.
>>25256593
>>25256593you just ask.
>>25256505How does TikTok's algorithm expose itself to it's users?
>>25256604>Approaching a woman feels oddly predatory and unnervingwomen only want men who respect their sexual autonomy. they are fornication only, you cant pin a name on one
it's Halloween Slavoj, please return to the hostel to torture your next victim
>>25257507You are short and probably have a modest pecker.
>>25257186Was that the opener line?
>>25257871>it'sits*
>>25256505he is absolutely right, there is no PC way of seducing a woman. The sexual realm is a Jim Crow world where men are not treated equal. One mans flirty eye contact is another's lewd leering. Some men get to fuck every day, with several women, others get threat profiled and called "entitled" for wanting 1 partner in their lonely life.
>>25259624>seducing a womanthats like getting the drop on a navy seal
>>25259446Not always but I mention I have been to prison at some point early on and they get curious
>>25256593You go to tinder or whatever and the algorithm decides who to expose whom to, and you just both get objectified. It's žižekian enough, but expansion of this would be to do the "his fleshlight gets fucked by her vibrator so they can discuss philosophy" thing he overuses in his talks and books.
>>25256505yes but he put it rather stupidly
>>25256505Sniff
