yes

>>25258137
I own a Kessinger's reprint (Thibaut's translation of Rāmānuja's Śrībhāṣya) and its fine, the paper is not too thin and I dont see major typology issues.

NYRB

>>25259112
They dont reprint much
Not compared to the ones in op's pic

>>25259896
Majority of their revenue stream is reprinting out of print books (see “NYRB Classics”) by buying those rights. Majority of their catalogue is reprint compared to their small body commissioned work under NYRB classics . The one’s in OP are POD slop and just uploading the dogshit pdf without any formatting

File: Screenshot_20260506_21275(...).jpg (255 KB, 1080x1544)

255 KB JPG

>>25260306
>The one’s in OP are POD slop and just uploading the dogshit pdf without any formatting
Yeah but where else can you get a print copy of Beddoes for cheap?
Unfortunately only through these people.

Dover if you aren't a mathlet.

File: 1000130001.jpg (3.79 MB, 3072x4096)

3.79 MB JPG

>>25258137
The paper and print quality of my edition of the Decline of thr West by Spengler printed by Forgotten Books is good. Only problem is that they swapped the odd and even pages while printing. It will bother you only slightly if you have OCD like me.