Is this a synchronicity machine? If you follow your own meaning, internally generated, does it become a literary orgasm?
>is this a heckin JUNGIAN reference??no, retard.
>>25259270So you're shitting on my balls? At least I display my balls.
>>25259352(respect)
>>25259352im stabbing them with the sharp knees of your wannabe gf
>>25259114>Is this a synchronicity machine? Maybe, but not really. >If you follow your own meaning, internally generatedIt can never be your own meaning, which is kind of the point. >does it become a literary orgasm?It is a literary orgasm.
>>25259270this poster (right here!) is jung and easily freudened
>>25259693t. jungfraude
>>25259114Catholics viewing the globe from a scholastic perception would not be entirely wrong to have that perception of the wake of finnegans wake and to take the text as synchrony machine and seek literary joy or joissance or pleasure although i would not claim that the text has to mean anything or claim for the text a heuristic hermeneutic hermetic meaning of exegesis or commentary because part of what joyce is doing letting the potential declensions of language stand against each other like nodes in a field or also in a network and these nodes have first or secondness or thirdness like charles sanders pierces and the nodes or partials or accidentals and according to porphyry the motor of the scholastics and the categories to porphyry and character universalis statistical mechanics leibniz these are all accidents of Substance or something like that and the perception of these nodal fields is something like experience or an experience which for a catholic would be a problematic perception or at least partly the disentangling of the concept of sin from the concept of experience might also be important and the history of scholasticism seems to have partly engaged with this issue topic i only add this part too because the catholic criticism from maritan on the scholastics art and scholasticism and from catholic critics on joyce in the monograph that anthony burgess wrote and also the pioneering work on modernism by hugh kenner which does not a bad job at indicating that corner of criticism croce and vico probably important also though both of those writers seem far from trad catholicism and that might also be where ideas on synchrony are important because there is the idea of a scale of substance and substance categories and synchrony seems to indicate another existentialle that wasn’t presence or absence that might affect the scale of substance or something like that
