>Ulysses? Never heard of it, chum.
>>25262265Again?
The fire rises. Pynchon, Gaddis, Gass, and DFW fanboys on suicide watch.
>>25262265No. I don’t think so, retard. You’re still supposed to be in the naughty corner.
>OH, LOOK.
Based he’s back!!!! We fucking killed some gaddis and pynchon fanboys. Should we get the threads back up? I posted an anti-dfw thread, who do we assign for the others?
What would his favorite chapter in Ulysses be had he ever read it?
>>25262281I’ll post a pynchon one. I did a gass thread last time. Assuming op wants to just post this one and not a pynchon one.
>>25262265I thought we ran your faggot ass back off to /v/? We actually had a pretty good thread on gravity’s rainbow without your anime posting and your worst, most idiotic, illiterate takes ever.
>>25262302What the fuck are you talking about
>>25262302Oh shit its the same guy again? What tbis idiot wants to do on a literature board I’ll never understand. The fact multiple anons recognized him as the biggest idiot here is astounding.
>got them seething again:^)
Should we coordinate our threads on discord? I think it might be a bad idea if too many of us start a thread on the same author at the same time.
>>25262265fuck you, you stupid nigger, and no vn’s aren’t literature. no go suck a nigger dick and slurp down the nigger cum.
Did the #GaddisGang street thing in SF get painted yet?
>>25262304Uh oh, touched a nerve. Just because you couldn’t derail a Pynchon thread with your anime and troll posts you want to pretend like it didn’t happen?
You guys got the wrong guy. OP isn’t the anime guy who trolls pynchkn threads. It’s actually the drunk dfw anon. I figured it out by their writing styles which are very similar.
What in the ever living fuck is this thread?
>>25262335Pure schizophrenia.
You see one fish in the bowl and you think you've seen the sea.
>>25262335OP used to try and troll Pynchon threads by posting anime and generally acting like an idiot because he hated Pynchon. Then he got his ass kicked in a debate over Gaddis and Joyce so then he had the idea to bump a Gaddis thread (another author he hated) for 3 months while samefagging that he was going to take down other authors. Then he started posting anti-pynchon/gaddis/gass threads. and possibly others.What's funny is I only found out all of this because other anons were calling him out in his threads, so I picked up the backstory.
What a shit fucking thread.>>25262265You’re a fucking dumbass.
>>25262354Meds. NOW
>>25262354Imagine getting your ass kicked in a debate so hard you bump a thread for three months by yourself. How fucking pathetic can you be?No doubt OP sucks nigger dicks.
>>25262265kys you fucking tranny
All these people hating on OP when all he did was creat some threads bashing Gaddis and Pynchon and DFW. And I agree with OP, they’re all shitty writers. So bravo, OP. Looking forward to more ofnyour hate threads.
>>25262330No, it’s not because he’s the one who kicked niggerlover OP’s ass on Gaddis and Joyce, see: >>25262354
May be the worst thread I’ve ever read on this site and that’s really saying something. OP you are one dumb motherfucker for starting this. I really hope you kys or someone in your family does. Preferably both.
>>25262404Don't blame oh-pee, blame the schizos.
>>25262418kys, you started this shit. but seriously, kys. its inexpensive.
>>25262404He started this because anytime he tries to talk about gaddis or pynchon or something like that its painfully obvious he’s a beginner at literature. Most likely self-taught, definitely never studied it in an academic setting because he always gives freshman level analysis.
This thread is hilarious. Completely and utterly deranged. I'm not sure if it's one schizophrenic samefagging or multiple schizos duking it out, but this is some good shit.
>>25262430Thanks Todd.
>>25262437it’s literally op samefagging. he did it in his last thread.
>>25262430I liked it when he said his entire key to understanding Pynchon is that Pynchon doesn’t actually write novels.
>>25262457>The next story I wrote was "The Crying of Lot 49," which was marketed as a "novel," and in which I seem to have forgotten most of what I thought I'd learned up till then.>marketed
>>25262516
>>25262265This thread is going to be up for two months, isn't it
>>25262535Not if we ignore it… which I’m not very good at doing.It’s evident he’s doing the samefagging thing again. You can tell it’s him with his awkward writing. This post >>25262330 stands out.
>>25262516>I had published
>>25262457damn, OP got Pynched! no wonder he hates pynchon, the man himself shat all over his theory
>>25262558>>25262569kys. seriously. yesterday not tomorrow.
>>25262457>I had published a novelWhat did Pynchon mean by this?
Please, girls, this is the Gaddis thread. Take your Pynchonese elsewhere.
>>25262457brutal own
>>25262457i dont think there’s any coming back from this OP
>>25262457I mean, if Pynchon really said that then, yeah, that would be absolutely embarassing, but how do we know Pynchon really said this? Isn't he renowned for being reclusive and secretive? Could be made up, no?
>>25262516>>25262530So do you consider V. a novel or do you think Pynchon is wrong and you know more than he does about his books?
>>25262272frayed sew
>>25262671It’s from the Intro to Slow Learner buffoon.
>>25262318not yet homie, 2 more weeks
>>25262457oof
>>25262457>PynchonMeme-tier author, but what else can you expect on /lit/.
How about you Pynchon deez nuts.
>>25262457Pynchon is a hack and stemcel so I’m on OP’s side. He doesn’t write novels, just shit for pseudo-intellectual performative readers and I’m glad OP is shitting on all you pynchuds.
>>25262887Why don’t you and OP go suck some niggers off then both of you kys.
>>25262879I’m sure you do that for a lot of niggers. We all know how much you love nigger dicks.
>>25262457How is this even a question? Of course Pynchon writes novels. Why does he need to state it directly?
>>25262899Because OP doesn’t have an actual literature education so he has to fumble through shit and come up with his own erroneous theories. Since he says Pynchon doesnt write novels I’ll go out on a limb and say he skimmed/struggled through Frye and didn’t realize how Frye used the term “novel” isn’t how it’s used in contemporary literary criticism. And I’ll take a wild guess and say he would probably say Pynchon writes Menippean satires. Which could be argued for and has in Pynchon criticism (not that he’s read any).
>>25262899Do you think Moby-Dick is a novel?
Does anyone know why OP got scared and ran away from the question posed here >>25262855 Is he really that unlearned in literary criticism that a half-baked read through Frye is all he has?
>>25262990>i-it’s a r-r-romance!!How’s it feel when a giant, veiny nigger dick starts pushing through your little faggot asshole?
>>25263033>How’s it feel when a giant, veiny nigger dick starts pushing through your little faggot asshole?Oh! my dear fellow beings, why should we longer cherish any social acerbities, or know the slightest ill-humor or envy! Come; let us squeeze hands all round; nay, let us all squeeze ourselves into each other; let us squeeze ourselves universally into the very milk and sperm of kindness.
>>25262855Kharpertian, T. D., (1985) “Of Models, Muddles, and Middles: Menippean Satire and Pynchon's V.”, Pynchon Notes 17, 3-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.16995/pn.362
>>25263054funny, when the topic is pynchon you shut up, but when it turned to nigger dicks you came right back. love slurping on them nigger dicks, don't you? answer this you nigger dick sucking faggot: how many nigger dicks you suck? how much nigger cum you slurp up everyday when you suck off those musky nigger dicks and have them put those giant nigger balls all over your face?
>>25263058Why won’t you answer the question? Is Pynchon wrong when he called V. a novel? Does Pynchon not know what the word “novel” means? Does Pynchon not known V. well enough to classify it correctly?Is the author of that paper more of an authority on Pynchon than Pynchon?
>60 posts of OP arguing shit and talking about nigger dicksGreat thread you absolute idiot. At least at the end of the day you can look in the mirror and say to yourself “Did I enlighten myself through literature? No, I discussed nigger dicks with anonymous strangers on the internet.” Seriously get a fucking life.
>>25263063Is Melville wrong when he called Moby-Dick a romance? Does Melville not know what the word “romance” means? Does Melville not known Moby-Dick well enough to classify it correctly?Are modern critics more of an authority on Melville than Melville?
>i'm so smart because I am not op!Bleak.
>>25263065It won’t work, mate. It’s useless. It’s clear from the way he talks he’s on the spectrum. Not in a 4chan insult kind of way but legitimately autistic. They don’t really understand what art and music and literature is about. For him this is what he reads literature for: to have these exact threads and talk about these exact topics. It’s better to just hide it and move on. Let him go in circles with that other anon discussing black male anatomy. The beauty of poetry is lost on them.
>>25263070No he’s not wrong because the modern usage of the word novel can encompass a romance written in the style of MD. Just like it can the gothic and detective novels and others Frye classified as romances and not novels.Now, why do you refuse to answer the question: is Pynchon wrong and you right about his usage of the word novel? Just answer. Why are you so afraid of answering?
>He's Gaddissing again
OP, get a fucking job.
>>25262457why’d this post cause op to seethe so much?
>>25262457How do you come up with a fucking theory just to get obliterated by an author who never gives interviews?
>>25262265Have you even read anything by Gaddis or Joyce?
>>25262457I always feel awkward seeing people get so publicly humiliated like this.
>>25262354The infamous thread in question, I presume.
>>25265123>3 part structure means copyingPeople can't be this stupid on /lit, can they?
>>25265146His other reason (if it was him) was that the prose “felt like” Ulysses’
>>25263078Did he ever answer this?
troll or no, pynchon is trash
>>25265123>>25265151He's obviously too dumb to read (let alone comprehend Ulysses) so I have no idea why he would think any of this. Oh, right he's stupid. I hope someone introduces him to literary criticism so he can start on his path towards actual comprehension. And when I say literary criticism I don't mean someone like Kenner who is far too advanced for him, he probably needs to start with sparksnotes and wiki summaries.
