>"I’ll use aggressively casual language, like, ‘hey yo, for real,’ or drop a bunch of exclamation points,” said Harvard, a 32-year-old copywriter in Brooklyn, regarding her posts and essays. “It feels so icky to do this, but it’s what you have to do to sound human.”https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/writers-are-going-to-extremes-to-prove-they-didn-t-use-ai/ar-AA22vhHGSo writing is actually fucked at this point, right? I think Altman may have porked our culture harder than his baby sis.
>>25262295I think the litmus test for AI is how often the text contains slurs.
>Harvard, a 32-year-old copywriter in Brooklyn>Brooklyn, a 32-year-old copywriter in Harvard
>>25262295no one who says the word "icky" should ever write down their thoughts.
>>25262350another retarded millennial who thinks she still in her 20s
>>25262327Kek
Human beings with a soul don't have these issues
>>25263176You'll still get canceled for using AI whether you did or not kek.
>>25262360Do zoomcucks really think there's a big difference in the three years of life between a 29 year old zoomer and a 32 year old millennial? Broccoliheads ain't so young anymore either.
>have the narrator frankly discuss niggers and kikes and why they're dbad for a few pagesThere. I have proven AI could not have written this.
>>25262295AI has a very obvious writing style that’s easy to clock if you actually know what it looks like.
>>25262295Just write in a style that AI can't properly imitate, and make it in a way that avoids the common cliches.
People are so retarded nowadays they cry AI whenever they see a semi-articulate, grammatically correct sentence.>He doesn't write like a nigger? Must be using AI.
>>25263485No, it doesn't.
>>25263976>i'm a faggot and a retardcope
>>25263987I wasn't going to bring it up because I didn't think it was relevant, but you sure are.
>>25262327kek
>be me>be middle-aged>haven't tried publishing anything in 20 years and there's no history of me writing anything in my life>just started writing a novel that I want to try getting publishedPeople would just assume I decided to write yesterday and it's all AI. I'm fucked.
>>25262295Writing was already getting killed by clickfarm pajeet writers and autogenerated articles (before llms existed). Used to be a very long tail of assignments existed that writers could use to earn side money or to become a progressively better freelancer. Start with short stories, with articles on assignment. Do the gruntwork of copywriting, ad copy, translation, interview transcribing. The internet killed the newspapers and magazines, blogs had their day then clickfarming outsourcing and SEO killed the internet writers. We now have a massive glut of overqualified writers and editors taking the few jobs that exist and no leg up for new beginning writers.
>>25263485>>25263976almost all AI-written text is produced with near-zero effort put into disguising chatGPT or claude's linguistic quirks. this is because putting effort in would defeat the purpose for most use cases. if you were going to put effort into it you'd just write the damn thing yourself.if you're clever and motivated, you can get these models out of the assistant basin and into contexts where they produce text in a different voice. this mostly isn't done for deceptive reasons because there's little to gain from it and for various reasons deceptive people have a harder time learning the necessary skills. harder is not impossible, though, and eventually you're going to see these tricks get used for mass production of convincing fake people.
>>25263998
>>25264246>almost all AI-written text is produced with near-zero effort put into disguising chatGPT or claude's linguistic quirks. this is because putting effort in would defeat the purpose for most use cases. if you were going to put effort into it you'd just write the damn thing yourself.Advanced users will write a skill document that the AI always references.
>>25264246Yet another post insisting on AI's alleged writing quirks without identifying them. Many such cases. Virtually all in fact.>>25264933I'm not afraid of you and your cast Chinese sword, fatty.
>>25262295if your book looks like AI you suck at writing anyway, AI made books are pretty obvious
Literally just write "nigger." No mainstream AI will do it. Ramping up the chud inside you is the only stamp of human authenticity left.
