[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


which one should i read between Spengler's The Decline Of The West and Evola's Revolt Against The Modern World?
if both, which one should I read first?
>>
>>25268787
No read Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, Locke, Machiavelli, Burke, Hobbes. Try to form your own thoughts and read critically and logically.
>>
>>25268787
>And if neither, what should I read instead?
Everything.
>>
>>25269459
+ De Maistre, Strauss, Voeglin, etc etc
>>
>>25269459
i took philosophy classes in high school, i didnt "read" the authors you mentioned but i know about their ideas.
i'm not really interested in pure philosophy, i mean i'm not going to read a 400 page essay by john locke to get a deeper vision of his logic when i already have a general outline of his views; that is enough for what i'm looking for.

what i want is something that draws from history, philosophy and religion and condense them into a unified theory about where humanity is headed to.
that doesnt mean i want to be spoonfed by someone else, i just want to hear different point of views from the brilliant minds of the past and spengler and evola seem to be what i need, at least after a first look into their works
>>
>>25269539
>strauss
Shalom
>>
>>25269650
You sound like a retard



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.