[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


>>
Man say but Doctor I am Dostoyevsky
>>
>>25272608
The only thing you need to read from him is the dream of a ridiculous man which is already quite short so whatever
>>
Let the retards stay retarded. The intelligent will find the undiluted truth in an intelligent matter anyway. It's practically natural selection.
>>
>>25272626
>natural selection.
Yet the higher iq people have less sex and reproduction, for both male and females
>>
we've been in the dystopian novel for a while, it started when they ditched greek and latin
>>
>>25272608
>content PhD
?
>His school still read real novels - Dostoyevsky good stuff.
Good morning saar!
>an an
>>
>>25272850
That's just a woman, but confusing their "intelligence" with jeets failing at English is natural.
>>
>>25272608
Can I make a plea for you to stop making these threads with X screenshots? They're low quality. If you want to make engagement bait, at least use your faculties to make something original, I mean you could at least improve your imaginative capabilities a bit, that's all I ask. This thread clearly has no thought put into it. It's bottom of the barrel. It devalues the board.
>>
>>25272863
Listen, autist. Whether you like it or not, the discourse on X and other platforms are often emblematic of events/trends/outlooks that are relevant to literature, be that in how it is taught, perceived, commodified, or engaged with.
Just because you're ossified cannot easily extrapolate what is relevant about that post to literaure as a whole, doesn't mean others cannot.
>>
>>25272608
can't wait for the ai condensation of GR

rocket go up
rocket come down
slothrop get boner
wtf
>>
>>25272637
We need a state program that extracts eggs and sperm from high IQ people, fertilizes the eggs, and implants them in women that will bear them for a small pay.
>>
How low do test scores have to get before we realize that tech in schools isn't working?
>>
>>25272876
Not sure what is the reason of your spergout but the problem here (at least for me) is not even the xitter post.
The problem is that the person on that screencap that made the post and the people that replied to it on xitter are not present here and they can't see your shitpost replies, you post the opinions of some random individual and that's it.
Which is why you could at least pretend to put any effort whatsoever and make an interesting thread to spark a conversation instead of regurgitating whatever your saw on xitter.
Also let's just say that a random bitch with barely any views is not really representative of events/trends/outlooks relevant to anything.
>Just because you're ossified cannot easily extrapolate what is relevant
Which is why people would prefer if you developed the idea further in your own words instead of having to engage with 1% of the xitter shitpost.
>>
File: 1778541142655804.png (469 KB, 931x1612)
469 KB PNG
>>25272608
> nooooooo the clankers are taking out government indoctrination jobs
this clanker said in the other thread that it wouldnt be able to assign 1984 to high school students because of the pornographic content
>>
>>25272608
I have AI evangelist teachers on my STEM course in uni and it's freaking me out for the future desu. On the one end we're complaining about idiot students not doing homework and telling Jarvis to get their degree, on the other the teachers are so lazy they tell Jarvis to make their teaching material, powerpoints and encourage students to use AI slop to explain shit.

Somehow I just know all of these idiots will be crying about AI taking their job as well.
>>
>>25272939
I will NOT be jacked off to completion on the government milking table. The frumpy civil servant will never touch me with her gloved hands.
>>
>>25273277
The AI push is coming from university leadership often with mandates to incorporate AI into your teaching by a certain date. I'm at the biggest university in America by student population, and AI is supposed to be incorportated into learning in all classes within the next five years. Even my PhD advisor is telling me to figure out a way to incorporate AI, specifically ChatGPT or Claude, into scientific research to automate simple drafting tasks or I risk being left behind.
>>
>>25273392
I don't understand the logic involved in pushing tech so aggressively in education. I went to school for engineering and almost all of our assignments were done using pencil and paper except group projects and learning coding and CAD software. Our society wildly overvalues computers imo, they basically just do stuff we could already do a lot faster. Same with AI. Do I really need help writing an email? And for math stuff I still have my TI-84 from school which still works great, does what I tell it to and doesn't spy on me.
>>
>>25273428
>and doesn't spy on me
Exactly why they want to phase it out.
>>
>>25272626
Don't worry, they'll "censor" the complete editions eventually.
>>
>>25273428
>math stuff
>TI-84
I'm sorry but what you're doing is not math if a TI-84 is sufficient for your "math" needs. You're doing glorified arithmetic.
>>
File: 1767441135432672.png (21 KB, 700x700)
21 KB PNG
>I'm sorry but what you're doing is not math if a TI-84 is sufficient for your "math" needs. You're doing glorified arithmetic.
>>
File: ti-92.png (137 KB, 580x337)
137 KB PNG
>>25273513
:^)
>>
Did it pay an Indian to write this tweet?
>>
>>25273524
Also we had Wolfram Alpha like 15 years ago which would solve complicated calculus problems and even show its work. LLMs are largely a solution looking for a problem.
>>
>>25272608
All these blatantly false, non-commonsensical or ridiculous predilections of society have only made me ignore everything else that comes from it. I don't even trust contemporary science anymore and that's saying much. I can't be the only one who started to live after his own rules, right? I mean a decade ago people would have said that will turn you into a social recluse, but modern society fails to even produce cohesive social gatherings. People debacle over wether gay sex techniques should be taught in school or not; very soon compulsory schooling itself will be questioned. Most people seem to think in a few decades the West will be super advanced and hyper-technologized, I think it will consist of a large number of groups segregated against each other next to a government that fails in enforcing even the most basic duties and a large series of electronic engines that sell basic goods for disproportionately high prices. Obviously the market will adapt accordingly and devolve for the most part to the primitive exchange of goods.
>>
>>25272608
>Trust me bro!
That's not how curriculum changes work in American schools. If someone in a specific department wants to make a department-wide change of the curriculum they have to bring it up to the head of the department, who will then bring it up in the department meeting where the teachers of the department will vote on whether to make the change or not. After that the head of the department will bring this up to whatever student-parent association body works with their district (which 9 times out of 10 is full of townies that are way too obsessed with local politics) and if it passes their review process, it can then be brought to the desk of the superintendent who will then decide if they want to go ahead with the proposal or deny it, and the denial process is just as long.
A district superintendent cannot outright demand that a department use a specific tool or a drastic change to their curriculum. That's just asking for a lawsuit from the teacher's union.
What most likely happened in the OP screenshot is that some fuckwad teacher in their department (probably the department head themselves) thought about using AI and the superintendent was pressed by townies to pass the proposal, which they did because it was probably the 5th time the proposal has been brought up and they're just tired of this shit.
But of course OP wouldn't know shit about any of this because their post is bullshit right from the get-go
>t. been working in public education for a decade
>>
>>25273392
>Even my PhD advisor is telling me to figure out a way to incorporate AI, specifically ChatGPT or Claude, into scientific research to automate simple drafting tasks or I risk being left behind.
Are these people fucking retarded? By the time you've checked the material, reworded it, fixed the errors, you might as well just have done it in the first place. The only people saving time are boomer retards who have included the:
>if you'd like I could reformat this presentation to be suitable for your lecture
sloppa into their emails and presentations. And if your input is zero, why the fuck do we need your ass in the first place? You're literally creating the argument for why you're fireable and replaceable with a retarded chatbot. And the thing is, if you don't realize that, and can't improve on sloppa, the suits are fucking RIGHT. Why do we need teachers and researchers that "do the work" of what chatbots can shit out?

Is it some kind of IQ test like "train your replacement"? Sure thing boss! First thing you want to do is pour ammonia and bleach down the toilets newbie.
>>
>>25273874
Yes. Instead of spending fifteen minutes writing a plotting and error calculation script, I can ask ChatGPT to do it in 5 seconds and spend a minute proofreading the script. That's a big time and headache saver. Same goes for asking for barebones skeleton code that I then modify to my specific needs. Instead of spending an hour getting a working example script, I get it in 5 seconds. Everyone who used AI agrees that in order to get good results you have to know how to ask and phrase the questions, which takes technical knowledge.
>>
>>25272608
Someone made a campaign contribution
https://www.savvas.com/company/learn-about-savvas/leadership
>>
It is kind of funny how these tools have uniformly cleaved society into the wise and the foolish once and for all without any hope of ever revoking this recognition.
>>
>>25274037
The most enlightening and at the same time saddest outcome.
>>
>>25273268
>if we follow 2200 and 1700 years old standards then we shouldn't recommend highschoolers a 80 years old book
>>
>>25273284
>I will NOT be jacked off to completion on the government milking table. The frumpy civil servant will never touch me with her gloved hands
Fug, I got a new fetish.
>>
>>25272963
Every marker in school has been going downwards for decades, have they ever done an honest self evaluation, or do they just game the system and dumb things down further?

>>25273617
Curious how you would respond to my post above
>>
>>25272608
the real tragedy would be kids actually reading tolstoslopsky in highschool, you're supposed to bloom out of puberty not get spiritual aids and turn into those annoying bearded death cultists
>>
>>25274454
Which post would that be?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.